Evaluation of an Inquiry-Based Virtual Lab for Junior High School Science Classes

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an inquiry-based virtual reality (VR) science lab used in junior high school science classes. The Scientific Investigation VR Lab (SIVRLAB) is designed for 9th-grade students to learn about electrochemical cells. It is situated in a guided problem-solving context, where learners need to review the concept of oxidation-reduction reactions and assemble a voltaic cell to save a robot. The SIVRLAB features several cognitive supports and guides for students to plan and record experiments and resolve the problem. It has both a head-mounted display (HMD) version and a desktop VR version. The study recruited 66 9th graders from three classes to evaluate the two versions of the SIVRLAB. The students were assigned to one of three conditions, namely, (1) using immersive HMD SIVRLAB individually, (2) using desktop SIVRLAB individually, and (3) observing one student use immersive HMD SIVRLAB. The students were briefly introduced to the concept of electrochemical cells in the first class and were instructed to use the SIVRLAB sessions in the next class. The results from knowledge pre- and post-tests, a user experience survey, and students’ reflections were collected and analyzed qualitatively. The findings revealed that students who used the desktop VR obtained the highest test scores among the three groups. However, in the follow-up physical laboratory test, the performance of the students in the original HMD VR experimental group was better than those in the desktop VR experimental group. The paper also discusses student feedback and teacher observations regarding the design and interaction with immersive VR. Lastly, the implications of the study and recommendations for future studies are presented.

[1]  Christian Gütl,et al.  Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Hsiu-Ping Yueh,et al.  Developing Digital Courseware for a Virtual Nano-Biotechnology Laboratory: A Design-based Research Approach , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Sara Klingenberg,et al.  Investigating the effect of teaching as a generative learning strategy when learning through desktop and immersive VR: A media and methods experiment , 2020, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Mina Johnson-Glenberg,et al.  Immersive VR and Education: Embodied Design Principles That Include Gesture and Hand Controls , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[5]  Yael Kali,et al.  Designing coherent science education : implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy , 2008 .

[6]  Guido Makransky,et al.  Virtual Learning Simulations in High School: Effects on Cognitive and Non-cognitive Outcomes and Implications on the Development of STEM Academic and Career Choice , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[7]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design , 2020, Journal of Computers in Education.

[8]  Rustin Webster,et al.  Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[9]  Rod McCall,et al.  Measuring presence in virtual environments , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[10]  Ton de Jong Instruction Based on Computer Simulations and Virtual Laboratories , 2016 .

[11]  Simon Richir,et al.  Proposition and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure the User Experience in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2016, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[12]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Standardized Test Outcomes for Students Engaged in Inquiry-Based Science Curricula in the Context of Urban Reform. , 2008 .

[13]  David Passig,et al.  Improving children's cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D Immersive Virtual Reality environments , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Roy Eli Kfir Virtual laboratories in education , 2001, AFRIGRAPH '01.

[15]  T. Jong,et al.  Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Lab , 2013 .

[16]  Michela Ott,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW ON IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY IN EDUCATION: STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES. , 2015, 11th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education.

[17]  I. Jung The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective , 2011 .

[18]  S. Owen,et al.  Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1989 .

[19]  James R. Brinson Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education , 2013, Science.

[21]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[22]  Hsiu-Ping Yueh,et al.  Developing experiential learning with a cohort-blended laboratory training in nano-bio engineering education , 2009 .

[23]  Guido Makransky,et al.  Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: A media and methods experiment , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[25]  Zahira Merchant,et al.  Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[27]  Kevin Kok Wai Wong,et al.  Learning with desktop virtual reality: Low spatial ability learners are more positively affected , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[29]  Wadee S. Alhalabi,et al.  Virtual reality systems enhance students’ achievements in engineering education , 2016, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[30]  D. Kuhn,et al.  What Needs to Develop in the Development of Inquiry Skills? , 2008 .

[31]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning , 2017, Learning and Instruction.

[32]  Xiaoqing Gu,et al.  Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head-mounted displays on learning performance: A meta-analysis , 2020, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence , 2016 .

[34]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Investigating Potential Relationships Between Adolescents’ Cognitive Development and Perceptions of Presence in 3-D, Haptic-Enabled, Virtual Reality Science Instruction , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[35]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Moving towards engaged learning in STEM domains; there is no simple answer, but clearly a road ahead , 2019, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  Anne C. Frenzel,et al.  Measuring emotions in students learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AE , 2011 .

[37]  Jim X. Chen,et al.  A Model for Understanding How Virtual Reality Aids Complex Conceptual Learning , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[38]  Flemming Konradsen,et al.  A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[39]  R. Mayer,et al.  Learning Science in Immersive Virtual Reality , 2018, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[40]  Sayra Cristancho,et al.  Observational Learning During Simulation-Based Training in Arthroscopy: Is It Useful to Novices? , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[41]  Ünal Çakıroğlu,et al.  A Design Model for Using Virtual Reality in Behavioral Skills Training , 2019, Journal of Educational Computing Research.

[42]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..