Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges.

Dosimetric properties of Virtual Wedge (VW) and physical wedge (PW) in 6 and 23 MV photon beams from a Siemens Primus linear accelerator, including wedge factors, depth doses, dose profiles, peripheral doses and surface doses, are compared. While there is a great difference in absolute values of wedge factors, VW factors (VWFs) and PW factors (PWFs) have a similar trend as a function of field size. PWFs have a stronger depth dependence than VWF due to beam hardening in PW fields. VW dose profiles in the wedge direction, in general, match very well with PW, except in the toe area of large wedge angles with large field sizes. Dose profiles in the nonwedge direction show a significant reduction in PW fields due to off-axis beam softening and oblique filtration. PW fields have significantly higher peripheral doses than open and VW fields. VW fields have similar surface doses as the open fields while PW fields have lower surface doses. Surface doses for both VW and PW increase with field size and slightly with wedge angle. For VW fields with wedge angles 45 degrees and less, the initial gap up to 3 cm is dosimetrically acceptable when compared to dose profiles of PW. VW fields in general use less monitor units than PW fields.

[1]  B. Mijnheer,et al.  Wedge factor constituents of high-energy photon beams: head and phantom scatter dose components. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  B. Bjärngard,et al.  Attenuation in high-energy x-ray beams. , 1994, Medical physics.

[3]  E. Klein,et al.  Surface and peripheral doses of dynamic and physical wedges. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  E. McCullough,et al.  Measuring dose distributions for enhanced dynamic wedges using a multichamber detector array. , 1997, Medical physics.

[5]  P. Dunscombe,et al.  The Siemens virtual wedge. , 1997, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[6]  D. Followill,et al.  A first order approximation of field-size and depth dependence of wedge transmission. , 1998, Medical physics.

[7]  D. Leavitt,et al.  Evaluation of a diode detector array for measurement of dynamic wedge dose distributions. , 1993, Medical physics.

[8]  S. Rathee,et al.  Commissioning, clinical implementation and quality assurance of Siemen's Virtual Wedge. , 1999, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[9]  A. Popescu,et al.  Wedge factor dependence with depth, field size, and nominal distance--a general computational rule. , 1999, Medical physics.

[10]  J. Palta,et al.  Field size dependence of wedge factors. , 1988, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[11]  B. McParland.  Peripheral doses of two linear accelerators employing universal wedges. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  Gunilla C. Bentel,et al.  Treatment Planning and Dose Calculation in Radiation Oncology , 1982 .

[13]  J. Gibbons,et al.  Calculation of enhanced dynamic wedge factors for symmetric and asymmetric photon fields. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  T. Waldron,et al.  Validation of a new virtual wedge model. , 1998, Medical physics.

[15]  D. Gaffney,et al.  Dosimetric parameters of enhanced dynamic wedge for treatment planning and verification. , 1997, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[16]  A. Maitz,et al.  Separation of dose-gradient effect from beam-hardening effect on wedge factors in photon fields. , 1990, Medical physics.

[17]  B. McParland.  The effect of a dynamic wedge in the medial tangential field upon the contralateral breast dose. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Jan van Santvoort,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of the Siemens Virtual Wedge , 1998 .

[19]  D A Low,et al.  Dosimetry and clinical implementation of dynamic wedge. , 1995, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[20]  B. Mijnheer,et al.  Wedge factor constituents of high energy photon beams: field size and depth dependence. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  J. Lydon,et al.  Beam profiles in the nonwedged direction for dynamic wedges , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  C Liu,et al.  Characterizing output for the Varian enhanced dynamic wedge field. , 1998, Medical physics.

[23]  B. Bjärngard,et al.  The relation between wedge factors in air and water. , 1994, Medical physics.

[24]  P K Kijewski,et al.  Wedge-shaped dose distributions by computer-controlled collimator motion. , 1978, Medical physics.

[25]  C. Chui,et al.  Beam profiles along the nonwedged direction for large wedged fields. , 1994, Medical physics.

[26]  W. Hanson,et al.  Off-axis beam quality change in linear accelerator x-ray beams. , 1980, Medical physics.

[27]  J A Purdy,et al.  Multiple machine implementation of enhanced dynamic wedge. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Wedge factors: dependence on depth and field size. , 1996, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  D D Leavitt,et al.  Dynamic wedge field techniques through computer-controlled collimator motion and dose delivery. , 1990, Medical physics.

[30]  Sha X. Chang,et al.  A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  A. Boyer,et al.  Dosimetric characteristics of wedges mounted beyond the blocking tray. , 1992, Medical physics.

[32]  F. Khan,et al.  Measurement of dose in the buildup region using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers. , 1990, Medical physics.