Methodological Triangulation in Nursing Research

Methodological triangulation is the use of more than one method to investigate a phenomenon. Nurse researchers investigate health phenomena using methods drawn from the natural and social sciences. The methodological debate concerns the possibility of confirming a single theory with different kinds of methods. The nursing debate parallels the philosophical debate about how the natural and social sciences are related. This article critiques the presuppositions of the nursing debate and suggests alternatives. The consequence is a view of triangulation that permits different methods to confirm a single theory. The article then explores the consequences for the philosophy of social science.

[1]  M. Slemmons,et al.  Factors associated with outcomes 3 months after implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion. , 1999, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[2]  D. Davidson.  Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation , 1984 .

[3]  J. Fleury,et al.  The Index of Self-Regulation: Development and Psychometric Analysis , 1998, Journal of Nursing Measurement.

[4]  F. Shih.  Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  P. Winch,et al.  The Idea of a Social Science , 1960 .

[6]  M E Duffy,et al.  Methodological triangulation: a vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. , 1987, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[7]  M. K. Kramer,et al.  Theory and Nursing: Integrated Knowledge Development , 1999 .

[8]  K. Knafl,et al.  Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Issues of Conceptual Clarity and Purpose , 1991 .

[9]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Interpretation and the sciences of man , 1973 .

[10]  E. Mitchell,et al.  Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science. , 1986, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[11]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[12]  R. Collingwood,et al.  The Idea of History. , 1947 .

[13]  Gn Gilbert,et al.  Forms of explanation , 1988 .

[14]  P. Thagard,et al.  How Scientists Explain Disease , 1999 .

[15]  S. Dootson,et al.  An in-depth study of triangulation. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  J Fleury.  Preserving qualitative meaning in instrument development. , 1993, Journal of nursing measurement.

[17]  W. Dilthey,et al.  Hermeneutics and the study of history , 1996 .

[18]  J M Morse,et al.  Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. , 1991, Nursing research.

[19]  M. Sintonen.  Explanation: in search of the rationale , 1989 .

[20]  J. Fleury.  Empowering Potential: A Theory of Wellness Motivation , 1991, Nursing research.

[21]  K. Knafl,et al.  Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches to instrument development and data collection. , 1988, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[22]  R. Foster,et al.  Addressing Epistemologic and Practical Issues in Multimethod Research: A Procedure for Conceptual Triangulation , 1997, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[23]  Ellen Sullivan Mitcbell.  Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science , 1986 .

[24]  J. Haase,et al.  Reconciling Paradigm Assumptions of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 1988, Western journal of nursing research.