Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique

To assess image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography (PGA) compared to retrospectively gated helical techniques (RGH). Forty patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and a stable heart rate below 65 bpm underwent CT coronary angiography (CTCA) using a 64-channel CT system. The patient cohort consisted of 20 consecutive patients examined using a PGA technique and 20 patients examined using a standard RGH technique. Both groups were matched demographically according to age, gender, body mass index, and heart rate. For both groups, two independent observers assessed image quality for all coronary segments on an ordinal scale from 1 (nonassessable) to 5 (excellent quality). Image quality and radiation exposure were compared between patient groups. There were no significant differences in vessel-based image quality between the two groups (P > 0.05). Mean (± SD) effective radiation exposure in the PGA group was 3.7 ± 0.8 mSv compared to 18.9 ± 3.8 mSv in the RGH group without ECG-based tube current modulation (P < 0.001). Preliminary experience shows PGA technique to be a promising approach for CTCA resulting in a substantial reduction in radiation exposure with image quality comparable to that of standard RGH technique.

[1]  J. Paul,et al.  Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT , 2007, European Radiology.

[2]  S. Abbara,et al.  Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose , 2008 .

[3]  G. Savino,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafts and MDCT imaging: what to know and what to look for , 2007, European Radiology.

[4]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography , 2008, European Radiology.

[5]  S. Mori,et al.  Effective doses in subjects undergoing computed tomography cardiac imaging with the 256-multislice CT scanner. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[6]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  C D Claussen,et al.  Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. , 2003, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[8]  Walter Huda,et al.  Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  S. Schaller,et al.  Individually weight-adapted examination protocol in retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT of the heart , 2003, European Radiology.

[10]  B. Hamm,et al.  Multislice CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Sublingual Nitroglycerine on the Diameter of Coronary Arteries , 2006, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[11]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[12]  T Nielsen,et al.  Adaptive temporal resolution optimization in helical cardiac cone beam CT reconstruction. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  W. Frishman,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography , 2006 .

[14]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience , 2006, European Radiology.

[16]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[17]  D. Oncel,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 64-slice computed tomography in detection and evaluation of anomalous coronary arteries. , 2007, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  P. Bourland,et al.  Radiation exposure during cardiology fellowship training. , 1997, Health physics.

[19]  R Haberl,et al.  A dynamic approach to identifying desired physiological phases for cardiac imaging using multislice spiral CT. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging , 2007, Circulation.

[21]  Ne Pacific.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose , 2008 .

[22]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses with Multislice Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  P. Schoenhagen.  Back to the future: coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. , 2007, European heart journal.

[24]  R. Cury,et al.  Cardiac CT in emergency department patients with acute chest pain. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[26]  G. Panayiotakis,et al.  Radiation exposure of patients and coronary arteries in the stent era: A prospective study , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[27]  J. Paul,et al.  MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  E. Picano,et al.  Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[29]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[30]  R. Günther,et al.  Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring With Multislice Computed Tomography: In Vitro Assessment of a Low Tube Voltage Protocol , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[31]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[32]  S. Miller,et al.  Radiation exposure and protection in cardiac catheterization laboratories. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  U. Mödder,et al.  Dose Reduction in Multi-slice CT of the Heart by Use of ECG-controlled Tube Current Modulation (“ECG pulsing”): Phantom Measurements , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.