Standardized decision support in next generation sequencing reports of somatic cancer variants

Of hundreds to thousands of somatic mutations that exist in each cancer genome, a large number are unique and non‐recurrent variants. Prioritizing genetic variants identified via next generation sequencing technologies remains a major challenge. Many such variants occur in tumor genes that have well‐established biological and clinical relevance and are putative targets of molecular therapy, however, most variants are still of unknown significance. With large amounts of data being generated as high throughput sequencing assays enter the clinical realm, there is a growing need to better communicate relevant findings in a timely manner while remaining cognizant of the potential consequences of misuse or overinterpretation of genomic information. Herein we describe a systematic framework for variant annotation and prioritization, and we propose a structured molecular pathology report using standardized terminology in order to best inform oncology clinical practice. We hope that our experience developing a comprehensive knowledge database of emerging predictive markers matched to targeted therapies will help other institutions implement similar programs.

[1]  W. Sellers,et al.  K-RAS Mutant Pancreatic Tumors Show Higher Sensitivity to MEK than to PI3K Inhibition In Vivo , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Vincent Ferretti,et al.  Clinical genomics information management software linking cancer genome sequence and clinical decisions. , 2013, Genomics.

[4]  A. Gonzalez-Perez,et al.  Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.

[6]  R. Bernards,et al.  Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR , 2012, Nature.

[7]  Vincent Ferretti,et al.  Feasibility of real time next generation sequencing of cancer genes linked to drug response: Results from a clinical trial , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[8]  I. Flinn,et al.  Ponatinib in refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Nikhil Wagle,et al.  Dissecting therapeutic resistance to RAF inhibition in melanoma by tumor genomic profiling. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Inhibitors of cell cycle kinases: recent advances and future prospects as cancer therapeutics. , 2012, Critical reviews in oncogenesis.

[11]  David N Louis,et al.  Rapid targeted mutational analysis of human tumours: a clinical platform to guide personalized cancer medicine , 2010, EMBO molecular medicine.

[12]  J. Shendure,et al.  Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Akira Mogi,et al.  TP53 Mutations in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer , 2011, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[15]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .

[16]  J. Neal,et al.  First-in-human evaluation of CO-1686, an irreversible, selective, and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR T790M. , 2013 .

[17]  Sarat Chandarlapaty,et al.  Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[18]  David M. Thomas,et al.  FGFR genetic alterations predict for sensitivity to NVP-BGJ398, a selective pan-FGFR inhibitor. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[19]  A. Gatherer,et al.  Sarcoma of the Larynx , 1958, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[20]  R. Reisman,et al.  I. Clinical response , 1981 .

[21]  T. Mitsudomi,et al.  Prognostic Significance of p 53 Alterations in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer : A Meta-Analysis 1 , 2000 .

[22]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Identifying driver mutations from sequencing data of heterogeneous tumors in the era of personalized genome sequencing , 2014, Briefings Bioinform..

[23]  F. Gnad,et al.  Assessment of computational methods for predicting the effects of missense mutations in human cancers , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[24]  Junfeng Xia,et al.  BRAF(L597) mutations in melanoma are associated with sensitivity to MEK inhibitors. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[25]  T. Mitsudomi,et al.  Prognostic significance of p53 alterations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[26]  William Pao,et al.  DNA-Mutation Inventory to Refine and Enhance Cancer Treatment (DIRECT): A Catalog of Clinically Relevant Cancer Mutations to Enable Genome-Directed Anticancer Therapy , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Loss-of-Function Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-2 Mutations in Melanoma , 2009, Molecular Cancer Research.

[28]  I. Wistuba,et al.  Kinase-Impaired BRAF Mutations in Lung Cancer Confer Sensitivity to Dasatinib , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[29]  Andrew L. Kung,et al.  A murine lung cancer co-clinical trial identifies genetic modifiers of therapeutic response , 2012, Nature.

[30]  C. Sander,et al.  Genome Sequencing Identifies a Basis for Everolimus Sensitivity , 2012, Science.

[31]  Pang-Kuo Lo,et al.  Deactivation of Akt by a small molecule inhibitor targeting pleckstrin homology domain and facilitating Akt ubiquitination , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals a recent origin of most human protein-coding variants , 2012, Nature.

[33]  M. Olivier,et al.  Prognostic value of TP53, KRAS and EGFR mutations in nonsmall cell lung cancer: the EUELC cohort , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[34]  E. Lander,et al.  Lessons from the Cancer Genome , 2013, Cell.

[35]  Nikhil Wagle,et al.  High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[36]  P. Bork,et al.  A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations , 2010, Nature Methods.

[37]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes , 2012, Nature.

[38]  Thomas Schlitt,et al.  Predicting the functional consequences of non-synonymous DNA sequence variants--evaluation of bioinformatics tools and development of a consensus strategy. , 2013, Genomics.

[39]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[40]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[41]  E. Lyon,et al.  Ordering molecular genetic tests and reporting results: practices in laboratory and clinical settings. , 2008, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[42]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  DGIdb - Mining the druggable genome , 2013, Nature Methods.

[43]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  MET Amplification Leads to Gefitinib Resistance in Lung Cancer by Activating ERBB3 Signaling , 2007, Science.

[44]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Biomarker-driven patient selection for early clinical trials , 2013, Current opinion in oncology.

[45]  T. Clackson,et al.  Ponatinib (AP24534), a Multitargeted Pan-FGFR Inhibitor with Activity in Multiple FGFR-Amplified or Mutated Cancer Models , 2012, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[46]  C. Sander,et al.  Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  S. Ellard,et al.  Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. , 2010, Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers.

[48]  C. Berking,et al.  MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[49]  J. Sosman,et al.  Preexisting MEK1 exon 3 mutations in V600E/KBRAF melanomas do not confer resistance to BRAF inhibitors. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[50]  X. Puente,et al.  Clinical response to a lapatinib-based therapy for a Li-Fraumeni syndrome patient with a novel HER2V659E mutation. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[51]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer Genome Landscapes , 2013, Science.

[52]  Spyro Mousses,et al.  A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer , 2007, Nature.

[53]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  A genome-scale RNA interference screen implicates NF1 loss in resistance to RAF inhibition. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[54]  E. V. Van Allen,et al.  Clinical analysis and interpretation of cancer genome data. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  Li Ding,et al.  Activating HER2 mutations in HER2 gene amplification negative breast cancer. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[56]  Hannah Carter,et al.  CHASM and SNVBox: toolkit for detecting biologically important single nucleotide mutations in cancer , 2011, Bioinform..