Objectivistic knowledge artifacts

Purpose By establishing a conceptual path through the field of artificial intelligence for objectivistic knowledge artifacts (KAs), the purpose of this paper is to propose an extension to their design principles. The author uses these principles to deploy KAs for knowledge acquired in scientific processes, to determine whether these principles steer the design of KAs that are amenable for both human and computational manipulation. Design/methodology/approach Adopting the design principles mentioned above, the author describes the deployment of KAs in collaboration with a group of scientists to represent knowledge gained in scientific processes. The author then analyzes the resulting usage data. Findings Usage data reveal that human scientists could enter scientific KAs within the proposed structure. The scientists were able to create associations among them, search and retrieve KAs, and reuse them in drafts of reports to funding agencies. These results were observed when scientists were motivated by imminent incentives. Research limitations/implications Previous work has shown that objectivistic KAs are suitable for representing knowledge in computational processes. The data analyzed in this work show that they are suitable for representing knowledge in processes conducted by humans. The need for imminent incentives to motivate humans to contribute KAs suggests a limitation, which may be attributed to the exclusively objectivistic perspective in their design. The author hence discusses the adoption of situativity principles for a more beneficial implementation of KAs. Originality/value The suitability for interaction with both human and computational processes makes objectivistic KAs candidates for use as metadata to intersect humans and computers, particularly for scientific processes. The author found no previous work implementing objectivistic KAs for scientific knowledge.

[1]  Heejun Kim,et al.  Evaluation of features to predict the usefulness of online reviews , 2017, ASIST.

[2]  Federico Cabitza,et al.  źMade with Knowledgeź , 2014 .

[3]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[4]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[5]  Carla Simone,et al.  Leveraging underspecification in knowledge artifacts to foster collaborative activities in professional communities , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Designing a Knowledge Management Approach for the CAMRA Community of Science , 2006, PAKM.

[8]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[9]  G. D. Wet,et al.  A framework for scientific knowledge generation , 2008 .

[10]  Michael M. Richter,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[11]  J. Hendler,et al.  Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence , 2014, Science.

[12]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Intelligent lessons learned systems , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Author-generated Dublin Core Metadata for Web Resources: A Baseline Study in an Organization , 2001, J. Digit. Inf..

[14]  Carla Simone "Objectivity" and "Situativity" in Knowledge It Artifacts , 2015, KMIS.

[15]  Mark Ginsburg,et al.  Annotate: a Web-based knowledge management support system for document collections , 1998, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[16]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Knowledge management in case-based reasoning , 2005, Knowl. Eng. Rev..

[17]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[18]  Mariana van der Walt Knowledge management and scientific knowledge generation , 2006 .

[19]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[20]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational memory and knowledge management , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[21]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Representing and Retrieving Knowledge Artifacts , 2008, PAKM.

[22]  David W. Aha,et al.  Intelligent delivery of military lessons learned , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[24]  John Durkin,et al.  Expert systems - design and development , 1994 .

[25]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[26]  L. Prusak,et al.  Financial Risk and the Need for Superior Knowledge Management , 1996 .

[27]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Development Recommendations for Knowledge Management/ Organizational Memory Systems , 2001 .