Life-cycle assessment applied to buildings: gaps in knowledge

ABSTRACT Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive method for environmental product evaluation. This study aims to analyse the development of the research on the use of the LCA methodology in buildings and to identify the knowledge gaps in this field. For this, articles were selected through a systematic review of the literature. The results show that LCA is only a simplification of reality. The application of the methodology in buildings is recent and requires more research to face the remaining challenges, such as standardising of methodology and inventories; optimising data acquisition and comparing studies; new methodologies aimed at reducing the limitations of traditional LCA, including other parameters such as the dynamic characteristics, so as to establish benchmarks for different buildings.

[1]  Jaime Solís-Guzmán,et al.  LCA databases focused on construction materials: A review , 2016 .

[2]  Carlos Rodríguez,et al.  Environmental impacts, life cycle assessment and potential improvement measures for cement production: a literature review , 2016 .

[3]  S. Mathé,et al.  Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Enedir Ghisi,et al.  Environmental feasibility of heritage buildings rehabilitation , 2016 .

[5]  Margaret Jollands,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings - A review , 2015 .

[6]  Iva Kovacic,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of embodied and operational energy for a passive housing block in Austria , 2018 .

[7]  Mark Hughes,et al.  Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: A case study on building assessment , 2014 .

[8]  Violeta Motuzienė,et al.  Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: a case study , 2016 .

[9]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  From the new European Standards to an environmental, energy and economic assessment of building assemblies from cradle-to-cradle (3E-C2C) , 2013 .

[10]  Getachew Assefa,et al.  To demolish or not to demolish: Life cycle consideration of repurposing buildings , 2017 .

[11]  Zhihua Zhou,et al.  Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis , 2017 .

[12]  Endong Wang,et al.  A hybrid Data Quality Indicator and statistical method for improving uncertainty analysis in LCA of complex system – application to the whole-building embodied energy analysis , 2013 .

[13]  Manish K. Dixit,et al.  Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters , 2017 .

[14]  A. R. Ometto,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of the use of Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: a case study on building materials , 2016 .

[15]  Olatz Pombo,et al.  The challenge of sustainable building renovation: assessment of current criteria and future outlook , 2015 .

[16]  Karen Allacker,et al.  Land use impact assessment in the construction sector: an analysis of LCIA models and case study application , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  Víctor Alberto Arvizu-Piña,et al.  Promoting sustainability in Mexico’s building sector via environmental product declarations , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of building stocks from urban to transnational scales: A review , 2017 .

[19]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[20]  Griet Verbeeck,et al.  Requirements for applying LCA-based environmental impact assessment tools in the early stages of building design , 2018 .

[21]  E. Sanyé-Mengual,et al.  Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings , 2017 .

[23]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review , 2014 .

[25]  Johnny Wong,et al.  Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: A review , 2015 .

[26]  Antonio García-Martínez,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review , 2017 .

[27]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  Dynamic LCA framework for environmental impact assessment of buildings , 2017 .

[28]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Compared environmental and economic impact from cradle to gate of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregates , 2017 .

[29]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[30]  Yousef Mohammadi,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of building envelope design for life cycle environmental performance , 2016 .

[31]  S. T. Ng,et al.  Critical consideration of buildings' environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[32]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Comparative life-cycle energy analysis of a new and an existing house: The significance of occupant’s habits, building systems and embodied energy , 2016 .

[33]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials , 2017 .

[34]  Theodoros Theodosiou,et al.  Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review , 2016 .

[35]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of U.S. residential and commercial buildings: An input–output hybrid life cycle assessment approach , 2014 .

[36]  Philippe Loubet,et al.  Critical review of life cycle assessment (LCA) for the built environment at the neighborhood scale , 2015 .

[37]  Darli Rodrigues Vieira,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review , 2016 .

[38]  Massimo Pizzol,et al.  Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis? , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[39]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review , 2017 .

[40]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Impact of normalisation, elicitation technique and background information on panel weighting results in life cycle assessment , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[41]  Saeed Mansour,et al.  Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[42]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  IEA EBC Annex 57 ‘Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO2eq for Building Construction’ , 2017 .

[43]  Min-Ho Jang,et al.  Assessment Model for Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions during Building Construction , 2014 .

[44]  Anne-Françoise Marique,et al.  Cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment within the built environment: Comparison between the refurbishment and the complete reconstruction of an office building in Belgium. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[45]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings , 2013 .

[46]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of three building types in a residential area in Lisbon , 2014 .

[47]  Walaa S.E. Ismaeel,et al.  Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in Green building rating systems , 2018 .

[48]  Xianbo Zhao,et al.  The importance of use and end-of-life phases to the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of concrete : a review , 2014 .

[49]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities , 2017 .

[50]  Patrick Schalbart,et al.  Integrating climate change and energy mix scenarios in LCA of buildings and districts , 2016 .

[51]  Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer,et al.  Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings , 2017 .

[52]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Comparing the midpoint and endpoint approaches based on ReCiPe—a study of commercial buildings in Hong Kong , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[53]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[54]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[55]  Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer,et al.  Simplification in life cycle assessment of single-family houses: A review of recent developments , 2016 .

[56]  A. Inés Fernández,et al.  Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: A review , 2013 .

[57]  Tim Johansson,et al.  An integrated BIM-based framework for minimizing embodied energy during building design , 2016 .

[58]  Yujie Lu,et al.  Beyond Boundaries: A Global Use of Life Cycle Inventories for Construction Materials , 2017 .

[59]  Liselotte Schebek,et al.  Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA) , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[60]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  Mathematical modelling of embodied energy, greenhouse gases, waste, time–cost parameters of building projects: A review , 2013 .

[61]  Sumiani Yusoff,et al.  A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry , 2015 .

[62]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review , 2016 .

[63]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Indoor environmental quality in a dynamic life cycle assessment framework for whole buildings: Focus on human health chemical impacts , 2013 .

[64]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[65]  Iva Kovacic,et al.  Building life cycle optimization tools for early design phases , 2015 .

[66]  J. Eyckmans,et al.  Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. , 2018, Waste management.

[67]  M.D. Bovea,et al.  Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes. , 2016, Waste management.

[68]  Antonio Messineo,et al.  How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[69]  André Stephan,et al.  Evaluating the life cycle energy benefits of energy efficiency regulations for buildings , 2016 .

[70]  Ben Amor,et al.  Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review , 2017 .

[71]  Cleomir Waiczyk,et al.  Avaliação de produção científica de pesquisadores: mapeamento das publicações científicas , 2013 .

[72]  Kristel de Myttenaere,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of the life cycle energy demand of passive houses , 2013 .

[73]  André Stephan,et al.  Life cycle energy and cost analysis of embodied, operational and user-transport energy reduction measures for residential buildings , 2016 .

[74]  S.C.L. Koh,et al.  A hybridised framework combining integrated methods for environmental Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing , 2017 .

[75]  Helena Gervásio,et al.  Benchmarking the Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Buildings , 2018 .

[76]  Magdalena Svanström,et al.  Life cycle assessment of construction materials: the influence of assumptions in end-of-life modelling , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[77]  Robert Černý,et al.  Ecotoxicology of building materials: A critical review of recent studies , 2017 .

[78]  M. Nye,et al.  Effect of Nutrient Removal and Resource Recovery on Life Cycle Cost and Environmental Impacts of a Small Scale Water Resource Recovery Facility. , 2018, Sustainability.

[79]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review , 2014 .

[80]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review , 2017 .

[81]  T. M. Leung,et al.  A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings , 2015 .

[82]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[83]  Simone Ferrari,et al.  Energy-environmental and cost assessment of a set of strategies for retrofitting a public building toward nearly zero-energy building target , 2017 .

[84]  Somayeh Asadi,et al.  Development of a new methodology to optimize building life cycle cost, environmental impacts, and occupant satisfaction , 2017 .

[85]  Martin Belusko,et al.  Minimising the life cycle energy of buildings: Review and analysis , 2014 .

[86]  Antonella Petrillo,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Kinds of Concrete Containing Waste for Sustainable Construction , 2018 .