A Semiotics Inspired Framework Supporting Branding in Automotive Integrated Product Development

In an increasingly saturated automotive market, product design may be the only distinguishing feature in a myriad of similar cars that are technically almost identical. Customers choose a particular brand because they connect with the car emotionally. The role of branding in the product’s success is vital. This chapter presents a framework aimed at supporting designers to integrate branding in automotive design. The framework is inspired by semiotics and includes the three pillars of integrated product development, namely, business, design and production. A number of real case studies are presented to substantiate how principles of the framework are applied in the automotive industry. The framework is an extension of our previous work, the version in this chapter includes a business screening frame. The framework has been evaluated qualitatively by a sample of academics and renowned designers working in the automotive field.

[1]  Mike Baxter,et al.  Product Design: A Practical Guide to Systematic Methods of New Product Development , 1995 .

[2]  Fay Sweet.  Frog: Form Follows Emotion , 1999 .

[3]  P. Herr,et al.  An Investigation of the Processes by Which Product Design and Brand Strength Interact to Determine Initial Affect and Quality Judgments , 2002 .

[4]  Marvin Berkowitz,et al.  Product shape as a design innovation strategy , 1987 .

[5]  Frédéric F. Brunel,et al.  Need Hierarchies in Consumer Judgments of Product Designs: Is It Time to Reconsider Maslow's Theory? , 1996 .

[6]  P. Aggarwal,et al.  Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products , 2007 .

[7]  P. Desmet,et al.  A Multilayered Model of Product Emotions , 2003 .

[8]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response: , 1995 .

[9]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[10]  E. Stolterman,et al.  The character of things , 1997 .

[11]  Robert Kreuzbauer,et al.  Embodied Cognition and New Product Design: Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization , 2005 .

[12]  Erik L. Olson.  The implications of platform sharing on brand value , 2008 .

[13]  Frédéric F. Brunel,et al.  Design and the Big Five: Linking Product Aesthetics to Product Personality , 2007 .

[14]  G. Day.  Is it real? Can we win? Is it worth doing? Managing risk and reward in an innovation portfolio. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[15]  Daniel Chandler,et al.  Semiotics: The Basics , 2001 .

[16]  Peter C. Verhoef,et al.  Assessing Customer Evaluation and Revenue Consequences of Component Sharing Across Brands in the Vertical Product Line , 2005 .

[17]  M. Cini,et al.  A SEMIOTIC INTEGRATED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING BRANDING IN AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCT DESIGN , 2016 .

[18]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Shaping things: intended consumer response and the other determinants of product form , 2009 .

[19]  P. Kotler,et al.  DESIGN: A POWERFUL BUT NEGLECTED STRATEGIC TOOL , 1984 .

[20]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Integrated Product Development , 1987 .

[21]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[22]  Jan Schoormans,et al.  The development and testing of a product personality scale , 2009 .

[23]  D. Norman.  Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[24]  Grant Mccracken.  Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods , 1986 .

[25]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[26]  Bryce G. Rutter,et al.  A Darwinian Theory of Good Design , 2010 .

[27]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Introducing a platform strategy in product development , 1999 .

[28]  Peter C. Verhoef,et al.  Assessing Consequences of Component Sharing across Brands in the Vertical Product Line in the Automotive Market , 2012 .

[29]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form , 1984 .

[30]  Yanxin Pan,et al.  Balancing design freedom and brand recognition in the evolution of automotive brand styling , 2016 .

[31]  Julie Khaslavsky,et al.  Understanding the seductive experience , 1999, CACM.