Mining Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups in a Corporate Governance Network

There is a new tendency for corporations to evade tax via Interest Affiliated Transactions (IAT) that are controlled by a potential “Guanxi” between the corporations’ controllers. At the same time, the taxation data is a classic kind of big data. These issues challenge the effectiveness of traditional data mining-based tax evasion detection methods. To address this problem, we first coin a definition of controller interlock, which characterizes the interlocking relationship between corporations’ controllers. Next, we present a colored and weighted network-based model for characterizing economic behaviors, controller interlock and other relationships, and IATs between corporations, and generate a heterogeneous information network-corporate governance network. Then, we further propose a novel Graph-based Suspicious Groups of Interlock based tax evasion Identification method, named GSG2I, which mainly consists of two steps: controller interlock pattern recognition and suspicious group identification. Experimental tests based on a real-world 7-year period tax data of one province in China, demonstrate that the GSG2I method can greatly improve the efficiency of tax evasion detection.

[1]  Kaisa Still,et al.  Insights from Social Network Analysis -- Case Board Interlocks in Finnish Game Industry , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[2]  Mikko Rönkkö,et al.  Board Interlocks in High Technology Ventures: The Relation to Growth, Financing, and Internationalization , 2010, ICSOB.

[3]  Alexandros Labrinidis,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities with Big Data , 2012, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[4]  Rosanna Grassi,et al.  The economic effect of interlocking directorates in Italy: new evidence using centrality measures , 2014, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[5]  Garry Robins,et al.  Small Worlds Among Interlocking Directors: Network Structure and Distance in Bipartite Graphs , 2004, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[6]  G. Weisbuch,et al.  Decision making dynamics in corporate boards , 2002, cond-mat/0209590.

[7]  Tao Liu An Empirical Study about the Effects of Interlocking Directorates Strategy on the Firm's Output in the Dynamic Environment , 2009, 2009 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[8]  M. Mizruchi What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[9]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  More Than Adopters: Competing Influences in the Interlocking Directorate , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Sana Elouaer-Mrizak,et al.  A Social Network Analysis of Interlocking Directorates in French Firms , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[11]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Interlocking Directorates and Profitability: A Social Network Analysis of Fortune 500 Companies , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.