Harnessing mutagenic homologous recombination for targeted mutagenesis in vivo by TaGTEAM

A major hurdle to evolutionary engineering approaches for multigenic phenotypes is the ability to simultaneously modify multiple genes rapidly and selectively. Here, we describe a method for in vivo-targeted mutagenesis in yeast, targeting glycosylases to embedded arrays for mutagenesis (TaGTEAM). By fusing the yeast 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase MAG1 to a tetR DNA-binding domain, we are able to elevate mutation rates >800 fold in a specific ∼20-kb region of the genome or on a plasmid that contains an array of tetO sites. A wide spectrum of transitions, transversions and single base deletions are observed. We provide evidence that TaGTEAM generated point mutations occur through error-prone homologous recombination (HR) and depend on resectioning and the error-prone polymerase Pol ζ. We show that HR is error-prone in this context because of DNA damage checkpoint activation and base pair lesions and use this knowledge to shift the primary mutagenic outcome of targeted endonuclease breaks from HR-independent rearrangements to HR-dependent point mutations. The ability to switch repair in this way opens up the possibility of using targeted endonucleases in diverse organisms for in vivo-targeted mutagenesis.

[1]  R. Rothstein,et al.  Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Leopold Parts,et al.  Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts , 2008 .

[3]  S. Sarkar,et al.  On fluctuation analysis: a new, simple and efficient method for computing the expected number of mutants , 2004, Genetica.

[4]  D. Gordenin,et al.  A single-strand specific lesion drives MMS-induced hyper-mutability at a double-strand break in yeast. , 2010, DNA repair.

[5]  F. Arnold,et al.  Directed enzyme evolution. , 2001, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[6]  A. Malkova,et al.  Defective Resection at DNA Double-Strand Breaks Leads to De Novo Telomere Formation and Enhances Gene Targeting , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[7]  Seong-Il Lee,et al.  Identification and Use of Zinc Finger Transcription Factors That Increase Production of Recombinant Proteins in Yeast and Mammalian Cells , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[8]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Combinatorial engineering of microbes for optimizing cellular phenotype. , 2008, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[9]  M. Wabl,et al.  Directed molecular evolution by somatic hypermutation. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[10]  Manel Camps,et al.  Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B. Shafer,et al.  The roles of REV3 and RAD57 in double-strand-break-repair-induced mutagenesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Genetics.

[12]  F. M. Stewart Fluctuation tests: how reliable are the estimates of mutation rates? , 1994, Genetics.

[13]  G. Lucchini,et al.  The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. , 2000, Genes & development.

[14]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production , 2006, Science.

[15]  R. Tsien,et al.  Evolution of new nonantibody proteins via iterative somatic hypermutation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Collins,et al.  Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  L. Rasmussen,et al.  Generation of a strong mutator phenotype in yeast by imbalanced base excision repair. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D. Gordenin,et al.  Hypermutability of Damaged Single-Strand DNA Formed at Double-Strand Breaks and Uncapped Telomeres in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[19]  P. Foster,et al.  Methods for determining spontaneous mutation rates. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[20]  K. Hammer,et al.  The Sequence of Spacers between the Consensus Sequences Modulates the Strength of Prokaryotic Promoters , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  A. Das,et al.  Viral Evolution as a Tool to Improve the Tetracycline-regulated Gene Expression System* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[23]  Robert P. Davey,et al.  Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts , 2008, Nature.

[24]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  J. Rine,et al.  Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Genetics.

[26]  Brian F. Pfleger,et al.  Combinatorial engineering of intergenic regions in operons tunes expression of multiple genes , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Estimating the Per-Base-Pair Mutation Rate in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[28]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Targeted chromosomal cleavage and mutagenesis in Drosophila using zinc-finger nucleases. , 2002, Genetics.

[29]  R. B. Caldwell,et al.  Protein evolution by hypermutation and selection in the B cell line DT40 , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  Susan Carpenter,et al.  Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  J. Tainer,et al.  Excision of cytosine and thymine from DNA by mutants of human uracil‐DNA glycosylase. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[32]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Novel mutagenic properties of abasic sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  J. Haber,et al.  Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[34]  S. Boiteux,et al.  Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, DNA repair.

[35]  Gilles Charvin,et al.  A Microfluidic Device for Temporally Controlled Gene Expression and Long-Term Fluorescent Imaging in Unperturbed Dividing Yeast Cells , 2008, PloS one.

[36]  T. Ellenberger,et al.  Dissecting the Broad Substrate Specificity of Human 3-Methyladenine-DNA Glycosylase* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[38]  Srinivasan Chandrasegaran,et al.  Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  Vasco M. Barreto,et al.  Activation-induced deaminase: controversies and open questions. , 2005, Trends in immunology.

[40]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Mutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[41]  Keith E. J. Tyo,et al.  Expanding the metabolic engineering toolbox: more options to engineer cells. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[42]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution , 2009, Nature.

[43]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Clustered mutations in yeast and in human cancers can arise from damaged long single-strand DNA regions. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[44]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  M. Lomax,et al.  Delayed repair of radiation induced clustered DNA damage: Friend or foe? , 2011, Mutation research.

[46]  J. Strathern,et al.  A role for REV3 in mutagenesis during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genetics.

[47]  David R. Liu,et al.  A System for the Continuous Directed Evolution of Biomolecules , 2011, Nature.

[48]  D. Schaffer,et al.  Directed evolution of adeno-associated virus yields enhanced gene delivery vectors , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  L. Symington,et al.  Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. , 2011, Annual review of genetics.

[50]  A. N. van den Pol,et al.  Viral Mutagenesis as a Means for Generating Novel Proteins , 2009, Journal of Virology.

[51]  Single-chain Tet transregulators. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[52]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.