Influence of continuous use of a vacuum‐forming machine for mouthguard thickness after thermoforming

BACKGROUND/AIMS Mouthguards can reduce the risk of sports-related injuries such as tooth fracture or avulsion, but the sheet material and thickness have a large effect on their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the continuous use of a vacuum-forming machine on mouthguard thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and olefin copolymer sheets were used for thermoforming with a vacuum-forming machine. The working model was trimmed to a height of 23 mm at the maxillary central incisor and 20 mm at maxillary first molar. During molding, the model was placed at the center of the vacuum unit. Three molding conditions were investigated (i) molding was carried out after the sag at the center of the softened sheet was 15 mm below the clamp (control); (ii) sheet heating started 5 minutes after the control, and molding in the same way as the control (AF5); and (iii) sheet heating started 10 minutes after the control, and molding in the same way as the control (AF10). Under each condition, vacuum forming was conducted for 30 seconds. Sheet thickness after fabrication was determined for the incisal edge, labial surface, cusp, and buccal surface using a special caliper accurate to 0.1 mm. The differences of the molding conditions on the thickness in each sheet material were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS For both sheet materials, significant differences between the control and AF5 were observed at all measurement points (P<.01), but not between the control and AF10. Compared with the control, AF5 was thinner and AF10 was a similar thickness. CONCLUSION The continuous use of a vacuum-forming machine led to a reduction in the thickness of the mouthguard. Intervals of 10 minutes are necessary to achieve consistent molding.

[1]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Effect of thermal shrinkage during thermoforming on the thickness of fabricated mouthguards: Part 2 pressure formation , 2017, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[2]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Thickness of mouthguard sheets after vacuum-pressure formation: influence of mouthguard sheet material. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[3]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Variation in mouthguard thickness according to heating conditions during fabrication Part 2: sheet shape and effect of thermal shrinkage. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[4]  A. Versluis,et al.  Custom-Fitted EVA Mouthguards: what is the ideal thickness? a dynamic finite element impact study. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[5]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Optimal heating condition of mouthguard sheet in vacuum-pressure formation: part 3 styrene-based thermoplastic elastomer. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[6]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[7]  T. Coward,et al.  An investigation into the relationship between thickness variations and manufacturing techniques of mouthguards. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[8]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Optimal heating condition of mouthguard sheet in vacuum-pressure formation: part 2 Olefin-based thermoplastic elastomer. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[9]  T. Takeda,et al.  Thinning factors influence on custom-made mouthguards thermoforming. , 2015, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[10]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Variation in mouthguard thickness due to different heating conditions during fabrication: part 2. , 2015, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[11]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Differences in the thickness of mouthguards fabricated from ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer sheets with differently arranged v-shaped grooves: part 2 - effect of shape on the working model. , 2014, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[12]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Optimal heating conditions for forming a mouthguard using a circle tray: effect of different conditions on the thickness and fit of formed mouthguards. , 2014, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[13]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Difference in the thickness of mouthguards fabricated from step-type polyolefin-polystyrene copolymer sheets differently arranged v-shaped grooves. , 2012, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[14]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  A method to maintain the thickness of the mouthguard after the vacuum forming process: changes of the holding conditions of the mouthguard sheet. , 2012, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[15]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Influence of color difference of mouthguard sheet on thickness after forming. , 2012, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[16]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  [Thickness of mouthguard sheet material after vacuum forming process depending on the thickness of mouthguard sheet]. , 2008, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi.

[17]  Y. Maeda,et al.  Thermoforming process for fabricating oral appliances: influence of heating and pressure application timing on formability. , 2007, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[18]  M S Cooke,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of mouthguard material. , 2001, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[19]  J. B. Park,et al.  Improving mouth guards. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  Johnsen Dc,et al.  Prevention of intraoral trauma in sports. , 1991 .

[21]  D. Ranalli Prevention of craniofacial injuries in football. , 1991, Dental clinics of North America.

[22]  D. Johnsen,et al.  Prevention of intraoral trauma in sports. , 1991, Dental clinics of North America.

[23]  T McNutt,et al.  Oral trauma in adolescent athletes: a study of mouth protectors. , 1989, Pediatric dentistry.

[24]  E H Davies,et al.  Materials for mouth protectors. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  R E Going,et al.  Mouthguard materials: their physical and mechanical properties. , 1974, Journal of the American Dental Association.