Toward Improved Calibration of SWAT Using Season-Based Multi-Objective Optimization: a Case Study in the Jinjiang Basin in Southeastern China

Calibration is an important step in most hydrological modeling processes because it helps produce reasonable results. This study aims to investigate the seasonal sensitivity of streamflow parameters and to evaluate the ability of a season-based multi-objective approach to calibrate the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The primary goal was achieved through an integrated approach. A variance-based global sensitivity technique, Sobol’ method, was used to evaluate the seasonal sensitivity of streamflow parameters. For the multi-objective approach, three objective functions were considered: the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of logarithmic transformed discharge, and relative bias. The model performances of the season-based multi-objective approach MOO(II), based on these functions and flow duration curves during wet and dry seasons, were compared to three other methods: SOO(I), a conventional single-objective approach to the entire series; SOO(II), a season-based single-objective approach; and MOO(I), a multi-objective approach for the entire series. The four methods were assessed using the SWAT model to predict daily discharge in the Jinjiang basin in southeastern China. The results showed that sensitivity of model parameters varied between the wet and dry seasons. The seasonal calibration approaches, MOO(II) and SOO(II), showed significantly better simulation performances during the dry season while the multi-objective approaches produced more accurate simulations of different aspects of the hydrograph, including peak and low flows and overall water balance, compared to the single-objective methods. MOO(II) captured the seasonal variation of hydrological processes best, compared to the other methods, and the parameter values it identified demonstrated significant seasonal variations.

[1]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Inferring model structural deficits by analyzing temporal dynamics of model performance and parameter sensitivity , 2011 .

[2]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Estimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure , 2004 .

[3]  Fred Worrall,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for hydrological modelling in SWAT-2000 , 2007 .

[4]  F. Anctil,et al.  Evaluation of streamflow simulation by SWAT model for two small watersheds under snowmelt and rainfall , 2008 .

[5]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment , 1980 .

[6]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[7]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[8]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Reducing the Complexity of Multiobjective Water Distribution System Optimization through Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2012 .

[9]  Tao Tao,et al.  Multi-objective Optimal Design of Detention Tanks in the Urban Stormwater Drainage System: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[10]  H. Kim,et al.  Potential Improvement of the Parameter Identifiability in Ungauged Catchments , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[11]  J. Blackard,et al.  Slope Angle-Interrill Soil Loss Relationships for Slopes up to 50% 1 , 1982 .

[12]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models , 2003 .

[13]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[14]  John W. Nicklow,et al.  Multi-objective automatic calibration of SWAT using NSGA-II , 2007 .

[15]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. , 2000 .

[16]  Deepak Khare,et al.  Individual and combined impacts of future climate and land use changes on the water balance , 2017 .

[17]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[18]  Hans-Georg Frede,et al.  Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis , 2002 .

[19]  H. S. Kim,et al.  Assessment of a seasonal calibration technique using multiple objectives in rainfall–runoff analysis , 2014 .

[20]  N. Fohrer,et al.  How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment – temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance , 2014 .

[21]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model , 2010 .

[22]  Jiazheng Lu,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of empirical hydrological model for streamflow prediction , 2014 .

[23]  Lei Chen,et al.  Analysis of parameter uncertainty in hydrological and sediment modeling using GLUE method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China , 2011 .

[24]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Modeling Land-Use and Land-Cover Change and Hydrological Responses under Consistent Climate Change Scenarios in the Heihe River Basin, China , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[25]  Xing-wei Chen,et al.  Improved calibration scheme of SWAT by separating wet and dry seasons , 2015 .

[26]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future , 2012 .

[27]  P. Reed,et al.  Rainfall characteristics define the value of streamflow observations for distributed watershed model identification , 2008 .

[28]  Kyungrock Paik,et al.  A conceptual rainfall‐runoff model considering seasonal variation , 2005 .

[29]  N. Fohrer,et al.  A multi‐storage groundwater concept for the SWAT model to emphasize nonlinear groundwater dynamics in lowland catchments , 2014 .

[30]  Z. Ouyang,et al.  [Dynamics of soil water under Eucommia ulmodes plantation in hilly red soil region of southern China]. , 2007, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[31]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[32]  P. Reed,et al.  Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models , 2009 .

[33]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Improving Model Performance Using Season-Based Evaluation , 2012 .

[34]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[35]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration , 2005 .