Mediators of the Relation Between Beliefs in a Just World and Emotional Responses to Negative Outcomes

Research shows that strong believers in a just world respond with less negative and more positive emotion to their own negative outcomes than do weak believers. The present study investigated mediators of this relation. We proposed that strong believers in a just world (versus weak believers) would make stronger internal and weaker external attributions for their negative outcomes, leading to reduced perceived unfairness, which, in turn, was expected to lead to less negative and more positive emotion. We assessed the just world beliefs of a sample of undergraduates as well as measuring their cognitive and emotional responses to an exam grade. Mediational analyses showed that our data were consistent with the processes proposed above. Various cognitive and motivational interpretations of the present findings are discussed

[1]  L. Montada Injustice in harm and loss , 1994 .

[2]  A Furnham,et al.  Measuring beliefs in a just world , 1998 .

[3]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. , 1989 .

[4]  M. Lerner The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1 , 1977 .

[5]  George R. Franke,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows , 1995 .

[6]  I. Lipkus,et al.  Relationships among Belief in a Just World, Willingness to Accommodate, and Marital Well-Being , 1996 .

[7]  N. Endler,et al.  State-trait anxiety and the experience of elective surgery in children , 1994 .

[8]  N. Feather An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations , 1992 .

[9]  P. Ekman Expression and the Nature of Emotion , 1984 .

[10]  R. Bies,et al.  The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. , 1987 .

[11]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Sphere-Specific Measures of Perceived Control , 1983 .

[12]  Isaac M. Lipkus,et al.  The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale , 1991 .

[13]  L. Montada,et al.  How Do Observers of Victimization Preserve Their Belief in a Just World Cognitively or Actionally , 1998 .

[14]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  P. Shaver,et al.  Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. , 1987 .

[16]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Beliefs in a just world and reactions to personal deprivation , 1989 .

[17]  W. L. Libby,et al.  Role of Intentionality in Mediating Responses to Inequity in the Dyad. , 1973 .

[18]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Beliefs in a Just World, Discontent, and Assertive Actions by Working Women , 1993 .

[20]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[21]  C. Dalbert Belief in a Just World, Well-Being, and Coping with an Unjust Fate , 1998 .

[22]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion , 1980 .

[23]  D. E. Benson,et al.  Belief in a Just World and Depression , 1990 .

[24]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[25]  C. Carver,et al.  Field-Study Evidence of an Ego-Defensive Bias in Attribution among Two Categories of Observers , 1980 .

[26]  P. Frazier Victim attributions and post-rape trauma. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Richard H. Smith,et al.  Subjective Injustice and Inferiority as Predictors of Hostile and Depressive Feelings in Envy , 1994 .

[28]  A Bandura,et al.  Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. , 1982, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Z. Rubin,et al.  Belief in a Just World and Reactions to Another's Lot: A Study of Participants in the National Draft Lottery , 1973 .

[30]  R. Lazarus Emotion and Adaptation , 1991 .

[31]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  Attributions for Exam Performance , 1980 .

[32]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[33]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .

[34]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. , 1978 .

[35]  C. Dalbert,et al.  The Importance of Distinguishing the Belief in a Just World for Self Versus for Others: Implications for Psychological Well-Being , 1996 .

[36]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Who believes in a just world , 1975 .

[37]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[38]  C. Wortman,et al.  Attributions of blame and coping in the "real world": severe accident victims react to their lot. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  J. Tomaka,et al.  Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  The Social Implications of Punishing Unethical Behavior: Observers' Cognitive and Affective Reactions , 1992 .

[41]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[42]  E. E. Ware,et al.  Locus of control as a modifier of the relationship between stressors and moods. , 1981 .

[43]  P. Bentler On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Individual Differences in the Belief in a Just World and Responses to Personal Misfortune , 1998 .