Contrast agent-free sonoporation: The use of an ultrasonic standing wave microfluidic system for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents.

Sonoporation is a useful biophysical mechanism for facilitating the transmembrane delivery of therapeutic agents from the extracellular to the intracellular milieu. Conventionally, sonoporation is carried out in the presence of ultrasound contrast agents, which are known to greatly enhance transient poration of biological cell membranes. However, in vivo contrast agents have been observed to induce capillary rupture and haemorrhage due to endothelial cell damage and to greatly increase the potential for cell lysis in vitro. Here, we demonstrate sonoporation of cardiac myoblasts in the absence of contrast agent (CA-free sonoporation) using a low-cost ultrasound-microfluidic device. Within this device an ultrasonic standing wave was generated, allowing control over the position of the cells and the strength of the acoustic radiation forces. Real-time single-cell analysis and retrospective post-sonication analysis of insonated cardiac myoblasts showed that CA-free sonoporation induced transmembrane transfer of fluorescent probes (CMFDA and FITC-dextran) and that different mechanisms potentially contribute to membrane poration in the presence of an ultrasonic wave. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, we have shown for the first time that sonoporation induces increased cell cytotoxicity as a consequence of CA-free ultrasound-facilitated uptake of pharmaceutical agents (doxorubicin, luteolin, and apigenin). The US-microfluidic device designed here provides an in vitro alternative to expensive and controversial in vivo models used for early stage drug discovery, and drug delivery programs and toxicity measurements.

[1]  A. V. D. van der Steen,et al.  Sonoporation of endothelial cells by vibrating targeted microbubbles. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[2]  Marie-Claude Potier,et al.  Analysis of gene expression at the single-cell level using microdroplet-based microfluidic technology. , 2011, Biomicrofluidics.

[3]  Lorenzo Capretto,et al.  Optimised production of multifunctional microfibres by microfluidic chip technology for tissue engineering applications. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[4]  M. Hill,et al.  Continuous-flow production of polymeric micelles in microreactors: experimental and computational analysis. , 2011, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[5]  Rosemary J. Boltryk,et al.  HeLa Cell Transfection Using a Novel Sonoporation System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  S. Shoham,et al.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  T. Kondo,et al.  The role of Ca(2+) in ultrasound-elicited bioeffects: progress, perspectives and prospects. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[8]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Non-contact acoustic cell trapping in disposable glass capillaries. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Juan Tu,et al.  The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[10]  Nobuki Kudo,et al.  Modulation control over ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: evaluating the importance of standing waves. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[11]  Ian Indans,et al.  Acute toxicity testing of chemicals—Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[12]  P Ravi Selvaganapathy,et al.  Microinjection in a microfluidic format using flexible and compliant channels and electroosmotic dosage control. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[13]  D. Spandidos,et al.  CYP1-mediated antiproliferative activity of dietary flavonoids in MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells. , 2009, Toxicology.

[14]  Jun Li,et al.  Apigenin protects endothelium-dependent relaxation of rat aorta against oxidative stress. , 2009, European journal of pharmacology.

[15]  Martyn Hill,et al.  Flexible acoustic particle manipulation device with integrated optical waveguide for enhanced microbead assays. , 2009, Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry.

[16]  A. El-Kadi,et al.  Induction of several cytochrome P450 genes by doxorubicin in H9c2 cells. , 2008, Vascular pharmacology.

[17]  R. Bekeredjian,et al.  Ultrasonic gene and drug delivery to the cardiovascular system. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[18]  Karsten König,et al.  Targeted transfection of stem cells with sub-20 femtosecond laser pulses. , 2008, Optics express.

[19]  Hui-Xiong Xu,et al.  Real‐time Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Infected Focal Liver Lesions , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[20]  A. El-Kadi,et al.  H9c2 cell line is a valuable in vitro model to study the drug metabolizing enzymes in the heart. , 2007, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[21]  Manabu Kinoshita,et al.  Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[22]  Peter Chung,et al.  Sonoporation Is an Efficient Tool for Intracellular Fluorescent Dextran Delivery and One-Step Double-Crossover Mutant Construction in Fusobacterium nucleatum , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) , 2007, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[24]  Junru Wu,et al.  Sonoporation, anti-cancer drug and antibody delivery using ultrasound. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[25]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[26]  W. Nyborg Ultrasound, contrast agents and biological cells; a simplified model for their interaction during in vitro experiments. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  Chang Lu,et al.  Electroporation of mammalian cells in a microfluidic channel with geometric variation. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  R. Knight,et al.  Clinical implications of apoptosis in ischemic myocardium. , 2006, Current problems in cardiology.

[29]  刘金明,et al.  IL-13受体α2降低血吸虫病肉芽肿的炎症反应并延长宿主存活时间[英]/Mentink-Kane MM,Cheever AW,Thompson RW,et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[30]  大房 健 基礎講座 電気泳動(Electrophoresis) , 2005 .

[31]  R. Guy,et al.  Physical methods for gene transfer: improving the kinetics of gene delivery into cells. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[32]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[33]  C. Peng,et al.  Enhanced retroviral gene delivery in ultrasonic standing wave fields , 2005, Gene Therapy.

[34]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  M. Halliwell,et al.  Optimisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[36]  Larisa A. Kuznetsova,et al.  Microparticle concentration in short path length ultrasonic resonators: Roles of radiation pressure and acoustic streaming , 2004 .

[37]  Diane Dalecki,et al.  Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[38]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[40]  R. J. Townsend,et al.  Modelling of particle paths passing through an ultrasonic standing wave. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[41]  N. Amso,et al.  Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz standing ultrasound wave. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[43]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-contrast agents. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[44]  Beat Ernst,et al.  Drug discovery today. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[45]  F. Duck,et al.  A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[46]  Junru Wu,et al.  Experimental study of the effects of Optison concentration on sonoporation in vitro. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[47]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[48]  Elazer R. Edelman,et al.  Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. , 1997 .

[49]  M. Miller,et al.  Hemolysis of albunex-supplemented, 40% hematocrit human erythrocytes in vitro by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound: acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[50]  C. Ganote,et al.  Adenosine receptor specificity in preconditioning of isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes: evidence of A3 receptor involvement. , 1994, Cardiovascular research.

[51]  B W Kimes,et al.  Properties of a clonal muscle cell line from rat heart. , 1976, Experimental cell research.

[52]  J Blitz Ultrasonics , 1967 .

[53]  S. Kharb Toxicology , 1936 .