Management of condition information from railway punctuality perspectives

Due to the increasing need for transportation and environmental concerns, there is a social and political will to transfer transportation services from roads to rail. The increasing demand for railway transportation services has a significant effect on important stakeholder requirements, such as safety, punctuality, dependability, sustainability and costs. This in turn affects railway practices concerning operation, maintenance and modification. Simultaneously, the ongoing deregulation of state-owned railways has caused new organizations to enter the railway sector. Hence, the punctuality of the railway is dependent on a combination of multiple required functions that are concurrently provided by different stakeholders, e.g. the infrastructure manager, infrastructure maintenance contractors and traffic operators. In Sweden, Banverket (the Swedish National Rail Administration) is the infrastructure manager and has the overall responsibility for railway punctuality. This means that Banverket has to coordinate and stimulate the stakeholders to provide the required functions in order to achieve the delivery of punctual transportation services. The purpose of this research is to explore and describe how information about the condition of technical systems can support stakeholders within the Swedish railway in improving punctuality by means of more effective and efficient maintenance. The focus is on delays that are caused by the absence of required infrastructure functions, even though the interaction with the rolling stock is considered through the study of critical interfaces. Condition monitoring technologies are focused on as the primary application for obtaining condition information on technical systems. Hence, the research is intended to provide knowledge about how condition information can be used in the quest to provide the quality required from the Swedish railway transportation service at an adequate cost for society. To fulfil the stated purpose, empirical data have been collected by document studies, interviews, work-shops, observations and field measurements. Examples of covered data are train delay statistics, failure statistics, No-Fault-Found events and wheel impact forces. The data have been analysed through statistical and analytical approaches (e.g. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, FMEA), as well as by applying theories related to principal agent problems, Scientific Management and international dependability standards. The thesis describes how the maintenance effort required by infrastructure maintenance contractors is affected by the maintenance effort conducted by traffic operators (and vice versa). The interaction between infrastructure and rolling stock has a significant effect on the systems' punctuality and the degradation of bound capital. Hence, effective punctuality improvements through maintenance efforts must be based on a holistic railway system perspective, i.e. a joint consideration of infrastructure and rolling stock. The thesis also presents how condition information can be used as a management tool to stimulate the fulfilment of performance requirements made on railway stakeholders. It is also shown that the same information can be used to predict and plan necessary preventive maintenance tasks, as well as to support continuous improvement of the technical systems. However, unless stakeholder needs are acknowledged and unless proper scientific investigations precede the formation of requirements and the applications of condition monitoring technologies, it is likely that the desired system performance improvements will not be realised. In summary, the thesis outlines a possible scenario in which condition information could support railway stakeholders in improving the punctuality of the railway system by means of more effective and efficient maintenance (A). Http://epubl.ltu.se/1402-1544/2008/36/.

[1]  Ulla Espling,et al.  Part I. A framework of partnering for infrastructure maintenance , 2004 .

[2]  M. D. Sudolsky The fault recording and reporting method , 1998, 1998 IEEE AUTOTESTCON Proceedings. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Test Technology for the 21st Century (Cat. No.98CH36179).

[3]  Visakan Kadirkamanathan,et al.  A novel self-learning fault detection system for gas turbine engines , 1996 .

[4]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Out-of-round railway wheels-a literature survey , 2000 .

[5]  Chunsheng Yang,et al.  Learning to predict train wheel failures , 2005, KDD '05.

[6]  A. R. Crathorne,et al.  Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. , 1933 .

[7]  Mattias Holmgren,et al.  A process view of maintenance and its stakeholders , 2007 .

[8]  Jayantha P. Liyanage,et al.  Towards a value‐based view on operations and maintenance performance management , 2003 .

[9]  Israel Beniaminy,et al.  Reducing the "No Fault Found" problem: Contributions from expert-system methods , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[10]  Andrew K. S. Jardine,et al.  Maintenance Excellence: Optimizing Equipment Life-Cycle Decisions , 2001 .

[11]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  W. Edwards Deming , 2001 .

[12]  Rikard Granström,et al.  Maintenance for improved punctuality. A study of condition monitoring technology for the Swedish railway sector , 2006 .

[13]  Ashok Jashapara,et al.  Towards positive partnering: Revealing the realities in the construction industry , 1997 .

[14]  Richard M. Hodgetts,et al.  FREDERICK TAYLOR: ALIVE AND WELL AND READY FOR THE 21st CENTURY. , 1995 .

[15]  Allen C. Bluedorn Scientific Management, Comprising Shop Management: The Principles of Scientific Management Testimony Before the Special House Committee , 2001 .

[16]  Roger Vickerman,et al.  Maintenance incentives under different infrastructure regimes , 2004 .

[17]  Dan Larsson,et al.  A study of the track degradation process related to changes in railway traffic , 2004 .

[18]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring of Railroad Wheels Using Wheel Impact Load Detectors , 2007 .

[19]  Peter Söderholm,et al.  Maintenance and continuous improvement of complex systems : linking stakeholder requirements to the use of built-in test systems , 2005 .

[20]  Rikard Granström,et al.  Verification and utilization of wheel impact detection systems , 2006 .

[21]  Rikard Granström A system and stakeholder approach for the identification of condition information: A case study for the Swedish railway , 2008 .

[22]  Alan Hobbs,et al.  Managing Maintenance Error: A Practical Guide , 2003 .

[23]  David Rennison,et al.  RailBAM - an Advanced Bearing Acoustic Monitor: Initial Operational Performance Results , 2004 .

[24]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation , 1982 .

[25]  R Lagnebaeck,et al.  Evaluation of wayside condition monitoring technologies for condition-based maintenance of railway vehicles , 2007 .

[26]  D. J. Burns,et al.  A novel power quality monitor for commercial airplanes , 2002, IMTC/2002. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37276).

[27]  Peter Söderholm A system view of the No Fault Found (NFF) phenomenon , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Stephanie C Payne,et al.  Portrayals of F.W. Taylor across textbooks , 2006 .

[29]  Ulla Espling,et al.  Part II. Partnering in a railway infrastructure maintenance contract: a case study , 2004 .

[30]  Mattias Holmgren Maintenance related losses : a study at the Swedish National Rail Administration , 2003 .

[31]  J. Moubray Reliability-Centered Maintenance , 1991 .

[32]  P. B. Petersen The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education , 1993 .

[33]  Michael Pecht,et al.  An investigation of ‘cannot duplicate’ failures , 1998 .

[34]  Douglas Hargreaves,et al.  Analysis of field data to develop rail wear prediction model , 2006 .

[35]  Andrew K. S. Jardine,et al.  Measuring maintenance performance: a holistic approach , 1999 .

[36]  Andrej Atrens,et al.  Strategic maintenance management , 2002 .

[37]  T Bladon SUPERSITE WILL ADVANCE TECHNIQUES OF WAYSIDE MONITORING , 2004 .

[38]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Establishment of Critical Success Factors for Construction Partnering , 2000 .

[39]  Jeff Jones,et al.  Investigation of the occurrence of: no-faults-found in electronic equipment , 2001, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[40]  J. Laffont,et al.  A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation , 1993 .

[41]  U. Espling Maintenance strategy for a railway infrastructure in a regulated environment , 2007 .