Measuring being lost in thought: An exploratory driving simulator study

In driver behaviour research there is considerable focus on distraction caused by specific external systems, such as navigation systems or mobile telephones. However, it is not clear whether self-paced actions such as daydreaming have the same negative effects on driving behaviour. In a driving simulator study, the effects of an internal cognitive process (internal distraction) on driving behaviour and physiological data were compared to the effects of a sound and speech task (external distraction). Three groups of participants made two drives on a motorway, with one control group, one internal distraction group and one external distraction group. Dependent measures included driving behavioural measures, physiological measures and a subjective indication of participants’ experienced involvement in the driving task. The effects of both the internal and external distraction task were reflected in speed, number of lane changes, deceleration, glances and subjective ratings. When an effect was found for both the internal and the external distraction task, the results indicated similar (negative) effects. Participants also indicated that they had the feeling they were less involved in the driving task with both secondary tasks

[1]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[2]  A. Fort,et al.  Mind wandering and driving: responsibility case-control study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Moshe Eizenman,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE DISTRACTION ON DRIVER VISUAL BEHAVIOUR AND VEHICLE CONTROL , 2002 .

[4]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Omer Tsimhoni,et al.  Address Entry While Driving: Speech Recognition Versus a Touch-Screen Keyboard , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  Explaining highway hypnosis: Experimental evidence for the role of eye movements , 1978 .

[8]  G. W. Williams,et al.  HIGHWAY HYPNOSIS: AN HYPOTHESIS. , 1963, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[9]  Pilar Tejero,et al.  Rear-view mirror use, driver alertness and road type: an empirical study using EEG measures , 2006 .

[10]  J. H. Kerstholt,et al.  Effects of prior interpretation on situation assessment in crime analysis , 2007 .

[11]  Rw Ady.  An Investigation of the Relationship between Illuminated Advertising Signs and Expressway Accidents , 1967 .

[12]  C. Owsley,et al.  The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. , 1993, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[13]  Jason S. McCarley,et al.  Mind Wandering Behind the Wheel , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[14]  L Parmer Tijerina.  DRIVER WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT OF ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEM DESTINATION ENTRY WHILE DRIVING: A TEST TRACK STUDY , 1998 .

[15]  S Stradling,et al.  Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? , 1990, Ergonomics.

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[17]  E D Sussman,et al.  Driver inattention and highway safety , 1985 .

[18]  John S Kerr.  DRIVING WITHOUT ATTENTION MODE (DWAM): A FORMALISATION OF INATTENTIVE STATES IN DRIVING. , 1991 .

[19]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  NHTSA DRIVER DISTRACTION RESEARCH: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 2001 .

[20]  Beth T. Stalvey,et al.  Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Thomas H. Rockwell,et al.  TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING HIGHWAY SIGNS BASED ON DRIVER INFORMATION ACQUISITION , 1973 .

[22]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[23]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  The role of driver inattention in crashes: new statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system , 1996 .

[24]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  M. Woodward,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[27]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  HMI and Safety-Related Driver Performance , 2004 .

[28]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Elisabeth Simone Wilschut,et al.  The impact of in-vehicle information systems on simulated driving performance : effects of age, timing and display characteristics : effects of age, timing and display characteristics , 2009 .

[30]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  HIGHWAY HYPNOSIS: A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS. , 1991 .

[32]  Dianne Parker,et al.  Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. , 1995, Ergonomics.