Pass-Through and Demand Forms∗

Under imperfect competition the curvature of demand is central to the rate of cost pass-through and thus to incidence and other questions of economic interest. We show that standard functional forms for demand severely and often unrealistically restrict the behavior of pass-through rates. We propose an Adjustable pass-through (Apt) class of demand functions that avoids these restrictions while yielding closed-form solutions to standard models. To illustrate the utility of this generalized demand form we show how to embed it in monopolistic competition. This allows us to apply it to canonical international trade models with heterogeneous firms and provide a natural case in which standard results on the competitive effects of international trade reverse. Incidence (viz. the division between consumers and firms of gains from trade and losses from taxation of that trade) plays a central role in much economic analysis. As we show in Weyl and Fabinger (2012), it is pivotal in, among other things, the behavior of supply chains, the design of optimal procurement mechanisms and the optimal taxation of international commerce. While under perfect competition the pass-through rate is entirely determined by the elasticity of supply and demand, under imperfect competition the curvature of demand also plays a central role. Unfortunately, as we show below, standard demand forms restrict this curvature in ways that have little empirical or theoretical foundation, are hard to work with analytically. In this paper we propose a novel, simple and highly tractable class of demand functions that avoid these limitations and apply it to provide closed-form, yet flexible, ∗Some results in this paper were formerly circulated as part of “Pass-through as an Economic Tool”, as well as an earlier paper “Apt Demand: A Flexible, Tractable Adjustable Pass-Through Demand Function”. Many individuals who contributed to those papers also aided us on the results developed her, but given that we have thanked them there for brevity we omit further acknowledgement here. We are grateful to Eric Guan and Yali Miao for their assistance in creating the Apt Demand Toolkit and to Daichi Ueda for more general research assistance. †Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802: fabinger@psu.edu. ‡Department of Economics, University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637: weyl@uchicago.edu.

[1]  A. Shaked,et al.  Relaxing price competition through product differentiation , 1982 .

[2]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis : A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods , 2009 .

[3]  J. Campa,et al.  Exchange Rate Pass-Through into Import Prices , 2004, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  J. Hausman Valuation of New Goods Under Perfect and Imperfect Competition , 1994 .

[5]  David Genesove,et al.  Testing static oligopoly models: conduct and cost in the sugar industry , 1998 .

[6]  James M. Poterba,et al.  RETAIL PRICE REACTIONS TO CHANGES IN STATE AND LOCAL SALES TAXES , 1996, National Tax Journal.

[7]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .

[8]  E. Glen Weyl,et al.  Pass-through as an Economic Tool , 2009 .

[9]  C. Shoup,et al.  The Sales Tax in the American States , 1934 .

[10]  Daniel Quint,et al.  Imperfect competition with complements and substitutes , 2014, J. Econ. Theory.

[11]  Using Cost Pass-Through to Calibrate Demand , 2012 .

[12]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[13]  J. Gans,et al.  Market Power Screens Willingness-to-Pay ∗ , 2011 .

[14]  Biagio Palumbo,et al.  INEQUALITIES FOR THE INCOMPLETE GAMMA FUNCTION , 2000 .

[15]  Jayant Menon,et al.  EXCHANGE RATE PASS-THROUGH , 1995 .

[16]  Y. Barzel,et al.  An Alternative Approach to the Analysis of Taxation , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  H. Rosen,et al.  Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis , 1998, National Tax Journal.

[18]  Empirical Models of Consumer Behavior , 2010 .

[19]  F. E. Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[20]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Estimating the residual demand curve facing a single firm , 1988 .

[21]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Agglomeration and Trade Revisited , 2002, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[22]  M. Bagnoli,et al.  Log-concave probability and its applications , 2004 .

[23]  Paul C. Pfleiderer,et al.  A Note on the Effect of Cost Changes on Prices , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  G. Ottaviano,et al.  Market Size, Trade, and Productivity , 2005, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[25]  Mark Shanley,et al.  Exploiting a Cost Advantage and Coping with a Cost Disadvantage , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[26]  L. Einav,et al.  Estimating Welfare in Insurance Markets Using Variation in Prices , 2008, The quarterly journal of economics.

[27]  O. O’Donnell,et al.  The Comparison Between Ad Valorem and Specific Taxation under Imperfect Competition: Evidence from the European Cigarette Industry , 1992 .

[28]  H. Hotelling The economics of exhaustible resources , 1931, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  W. Reed The Pareto law of incomes—an explanation and an extension , 2003 .