Improving the calling of non-invasive prenatal testing on 13-/18-/21-trisomy by support vector machine discrimination

With the advance of next-generation sequencing technologies, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been developed and employed in fetal aneuploidy screening on 13-/18-/21-trisomies through detecting cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood. Although Z test is widely used in NIPT nowadays, there is still necessity to improve its accuracy for removing a) false negatives and false positives, and b) the ratio of unclassified data, so as to reduce the potential harm to patients caused by these inaccuracies as well as the induced cost of retests. Employing multiple Z tests with machine-learning algorithm could provide a better prediction on NIPT data. Combining the multiple Z values with indexes of clinical signs and quality control, features were collected from the known samples and scaled for model training in support vector machine (SVM) discrimination. The trained model was applied to predict the unknown samples, which showed significant improvement. In 4752 qualified NIPT data, our method reached 100% accuracies on all three chromosomes, including 151 data that were grouped as unclassified by one-Z-value based method. Moreover, four false positives and four false negatives were corrected by using this machine-learning model. To our knowledge, this is the first study to employ support vector machine in NIPT data analysis. It is expected to replace the current one-Z-value based NIPT analysis in clinical use.

[1]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[2]  Oceania Perinatal Societies The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine , 2002 .

[3]  Yoonkyung Lee,et al.  Classification of Multiple Cancer Types by Multicategory Support Vector Machines Using Gene Expression Data , 2003, Bioinform..

[4]  Peiyong Jiang,et al.  FetalQuant: deducing fractional fetal DNA concentration from massively parallel sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma , 2012, Bioinform..

[5]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Support vector machine , 2013 .

[6]  C. Cantor,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  C. Strom,et al.  Discordant noninvasive prenatal testing and cytogenetic results: a study of 109 consecutive cases , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  Peiyong Jiang,et al.  FetalQuantSD: accurate quantification of fetal DNA fraction by shallow-depth sequencing of maternal plasma DNA , 2016, npj Genomic Medicine.

[9]  K. Ormond,et al.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors , 2013, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[10]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  IONA test for first‐trimester detection of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  Jason Li,et al.  Splice site identification using probabilistic parameters and SVM classification , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  Wei-Mou Zheng,et al.  Noninvasive Fetal Trisomy (NIFTY) test: an advanced noninvasive prenatal diagnosis methodology for fetal autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies , 2012, BMC Medical Genomics.

[13]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Asymptotic Behaviors of Support Vector Machines with Gaussian Kernel , 2003, Neural Computation.

[14]  Peiyong Jiang,et al.  Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 13 by Maternal Plasma DNA Sequencing , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Ru Li,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  K. Choy,et al.  Combined Count- and Size-Based Analysis of Maternal Plasma DNA for Noninvasive Prenatal Detection of Fetal Subchromosomal Aberrations Facilitates Elucidation of the Fetal and/or Maternal Origin of the Aberrations. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[18]  M. Halks-Miller,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal testing in the general obstetric population: clinical performance and counseling considerations in over 85 000 cases† , 2016, Prenatal diagnosis.

[19]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[20]  Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  Xiuqing Zhang,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies by maternal plasma DNA sequencing , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[22]  Amin R. Mazloom,et al.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Chromosomal Aneuploidy Testing - Clinical Experience: 100,000 Clinical Samples , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  H. C. Fan,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  John Tynan,et al.  Determination of fetal DNA fraction from the plasma of pregnant women using sequence read counts , 2015, Prenatal diagnosis.

[25]  Whitney Wooderchak-Donahue,et al.  A support vector machine for identification of single-nucleotide polymorphisms from next-generation sequencing data , 2013, Bioinform..

[26]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[27]  L. Dugoff,et al.  Prenatal Detection of Down Syndrome using Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS): a rapid response statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, 24 October 2011 , 2012, Prenatal diagnosis.