Argument Visualization and Narrative Approaches for Collaborative Spatial Decision Making and Knowledge Construction: A Case Study for an Offshore Wind Farm Project

A Geographic Information Systems GIS play a vital role in various applications associated with sustainable development and clean energy. In these applications, the GIS provides a capability to upload on-site geographical information collected by public into online maps. One of the major problems is how to make a decision for those reports. In this paper, we study two types of cognitive modes for decision making: argument and narrative reasoning. We investigate how various discussion representations, argumentation theoretical model, and reasoning modes of geo-graphics problems affect knowledge accumulation and argument quality. We conduct empirical tests on different groups of participants regarding their discussions on a particular offshore wind farm project as a case study. We have demonstrated that graph representation provides better results than threaded representation for collaborative work. We also illustrate that the argument theoretical model leads to reduce participants' performance. Moreover, we conclude that there is no significant difference between narrative representation and graph representation in the participants' performance to construct knowledge.

[1]  Mark Klein,et al.  Mediating debate through on-line large-scale argumentation: Evidence from the field , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Web-PPGIS Usability and Public Engagement: A Case Study in Canmore, Alberta, Canada , 2010 .

[4]  Claus Rinner,et al.  A geospatial Web application to map observations and opinions in environmental planning , 2011 .

[5]  Tudor Groza,et al.  A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web , 2013, Semantic Web.

[6]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[7]  RinnerClaus,et al.  A Scalable GeoWeb Tool for Argumentation Mapping , 2011 .

[8]  Claus Rinner,et al.  The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[9]  Songnian Li,et al.  Developing a web-based, collaborative PPGIS prototype to support public participation , 2012 .

[10]  David Zarefsky,et al.  Argumentation: The Study Of Effective Reasoning , 2001 .

[11]  Ali Mostashari,et al.  Collaborative Modeling and Decision-Making for Complex Energy Systems , 2011 .

[12]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[13]  David J. Coleman,et al.  GeoDF: Towards a SDI-based PPGIS application for E-Governance , 2006 .

[14]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: A tool for all reasons , 1989, JASIS.

[15]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  Narrative-based Interactive Learning Environments from Modelling Reasoning , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[16]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence , 2006, JURIX.

[17]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Designing Argumentation Tools for Collaborative Learning , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[18]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[19]  Claus Rinner Computer support for discussions in spatial planning , 2005 .

[20]  J. F. Voss Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems , 2005 .

[21]  Paola Barbara Floreddu,et al.  Public Participation in Environmental decision making: the case of PPGIS , 2011 .

[22]  Claus Rinner,et al.  Analyzing the Usability of an Argumentation Map as a Participatory Spatial Decision Support Tool , 2007 .

[23]  Ana Simão,et al.  Web-based Gis for Collaborative Planning and Public Participation: an Application to the Strategic Planning of Wind Farm Sites Keywords: Spatial Planning Collaborative Planning Wind Energy Multi-criteria Spatial Decision Support System (mc-sdss) Argumentation Map Learning Environment World Wide Web , 2022 .

[24]  D. Jonassen Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide , 2009 .

[25]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .

[26]  Jason B. Harris,et al.  INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTIONS , HEPATITIS , AND GASTROENTERITIS ( DA BOBAK , SECTION EDITOR ) Cholera : Lessons from Haiti and Beyond , 2011 .

[27]  Chris Reed,et al.  A pluralist approach to argument diagramming , 2007 .

[28]  Claus Rinner,et al.  An argumentation map prototype to support decision-making in spatial planning , 2005 .

[29]  Claus Rinner,et al.  Evaluating Community Engagement through Argumentation Maps—A Public Participation GIS Case Study , 2009 .

[30]  John M. Artz Narrative vs. logical reasoning in computer ethics , 1998, CSOC.

[31]  Alessio Malizia,et al.  eStorys: A visual storyboard system supporting back-channel communication for emergencies , 2011, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..