Improved functional overview of protein complexes using inferred epistatic relationships

BackgroundEpistatic Miniarray Profiling(E-MAP) quantifies the net effect on growth rate of disrupting pairs of genes, often producing phenotypes that may be more (negative epistasis) or less (positive epistasis) severe than the phenotype predicted based on single gene disruptions. Epistatic interactions are important for understanding cell biology because they define relationships between individual genes, and between sets of genes involved in biochemical pathways and protein complexes. Each E-MAP screen quantifies the interactions between a logically selected subset of genes (e.g. genes whose products share a common function). Interactions that occur between genes involved in different cellular processes are not as frequently measured, yet these interactions are important for providing an overview of cellular organization.ResultsWe introduce a method for combining overlapping E-MAP screens and inferring new interactions between them. We use this method to infer with high confidence 2,240 new strongly epistatic interactions and 34,469 weakly epistatic or neutral interactions. We show that accuracy of the predicted interactions approaches that of replicate experiments and that, like measured interactions, they are enriched for features such as shared biochemical pathways and knockout phenotypes. We constructed an expanded epistasis map for yeast cell protein complexes and show that our new interactions increase the evidence for previously proposed inter-complex connections, and predict many new links. We validated a number of these in the laboratory, including new interactions linking the SWR-C chromatin modifying complex and the nuclear transport apparatus.ConclusionOverall, our data support a modular model of yeast cell protein network organization and show how prediction methods can considerably extend the information that can be extracted from overlapping E-MAP screens.

[1]  M. Vidal,et al.  RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[2]  B. Barrell,et al.  Life with 6000 Genes , 1996, Science.

[3]  K. Struhl,et al.  Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. , 1998, Genes & development.

[4]  angesichts der Corona-Pandemie,et al.  UPDATE , 1973, The Lancet.

[5]  David Botstein,et al.  SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Hiroyuki Ogata,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  E. Maxwell,et al.  Box C/D snoRNA-associated proteins: two pairs of evolutionarily ancient proteins and possible links to replication and transcription. , 2000, RNA.

[8]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[9]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[11]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[14]  David Tollervey,et al.  Making ribosomes. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[15]  Huiming Ding,et al.  A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[16]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[17]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[18]  Wei-Hua Wu,et al.  ATP-Driven Exchange of Histone H2AZ Variant Catalyzed by SWR1 Chromatin Remodeling Complex , 2004, Science.

[19]  Martin Kupiec,et al.  A genome-wide screen for Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants that affect telomere length. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[21]  Eulàlia de Nadal,et al.  The MAPK Hog1 recruits Rpd3 histone deacetylase to activate osmoresponsive genes , 2004, Nature.

[22]  G. Schlenstedt,et al.  The histones H2A/H2B and H3/H4 are imported into the yeast nucleus by different mechanisms. , 2004, European journal of cell biology.

[23]  Andrew J Link,et al.  A Protein Complex Containing the Conserved Swi2/Snf2-Related ATPase Swr1p Deposits Histone Variant H2A.Z into Euchromatin , 2004, PLoS biology.

[24]  S. L. Wong,et al.  Combining biological networks to predict genetic interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  T. Hughes,et al.  Exploration of Essential Gene Functions via Titratable Promoter Alleles , 2004, Cell.

[26]  M. Polymenis,et al.  A new enrichment approach identifies genes that alter cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Current Genetics.

[27]  G. Church,et al.  Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data , 2006, Genome Biology.

[29]  T. Ideker,et al.  Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Exploration of the Function and Organization of the Yeast Early Secretory Pathway through an Epistatic Miniarray Profile , 2005, Cell.

[31]  Weiwei Zhong,et al.  Genome-Wide Prediction of C. elegans Genetic Interactions , 2006, Science.

[32]  T. Hughes,et al.  Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[33]  T. Ideker,et al.  Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Journal of biology.

[34]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[35]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[36]  Yvonne N Fondufe-Mittendorf,et al.  H2A.Z-Mediated Localization of Genes at the Nuclear Periphery Confers Epigenetic Memory of Previous Transcriptional State , 2007, PLoS biology.

[37]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  dSLAM analysis of genome-wide genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Methods.

[38]  H. Bussey,et al.  Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Integrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Andrew Emili,et al.  Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Proteomics.

[41]  C. Daub,et al.  BMC Systems Biology , 2007 .

[42]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part I. Experimental Techniques and Databases , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  Grant W. Brown,et al.  Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map , 2007, Nature.

[44]  F. Rigo,et al.  Functional Coupling of Last-Intron Splicing and 3′-End Processing to Transcription In Vitro: the Poly(A) Signal Couples to Splicing before Committing to Cleavage , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[45]  Orna Elroy-Stein,et al.  Regulation of mRNA Translation during cellular division , 2008, Cell cycle.

[46]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Functional Maps of Protein Complexes from Quantitative Genetic Interaction Data , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[48]  Ambuj K. Singh,et al.  Predicting genetic interactions with random walks on biological networks , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[49]  Robert P. St.Onge,et al.  The Chemical Genomic Portrait of Yeast: Uncovering a Phenotype for All Genes , 2008, Science.

[50]  R. Shamir,et al.  From E-MAPs to module maps: dissecting quantitative genetic interactions using physical interactions , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[51]  Shan Zhao,et al.  Mining protein networks for synthetic genetic interactions , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[52]  J. Bader,et al.  Finding friends and enemies in an enemies-only network: a graph diffusion kernel for predicting novel genetic interactions and co-complex membership from yeast genetic interactions. , 2008, Genome research.

[53]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[54]  R. Shamir,et al.  Towards accurate imputation of quantitative genetic interactions , 2009, Genome Biology.

[55]  Simon Tavaré,et al.  Genome-wide replication profiles indicate an expansive role for Rpd3L in regulating replication initiation timing or efficiency, and reveal genomic loci of Rpd3 function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Genes & development.

[56]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Functional Organization of the S. cerevisiae Phosphorylation Network , 2009, Cell.

[57]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[58]  Derek Greene,et al.  Missing value imputation for epistatic MAPs , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[59]  S. Pu,et al.  Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[60]  Gary D Bader,et al.  The Genetic Landscape of a Cell , 2010, Science.