Estimation of spatial and temporal variability of pasture growth and digestibility in grazing rotations coupling unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with crop simulation models

Systematic monitoring of pasture quantity and quality is important to match the herd forage demand (pasture removal by grazing or harvest) to the supply of forage with adequate nutritive value. The aim of this research was to monitor, assess and manage changes in pasture growth, morphology and digestibility by integrating information from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and two process-based models. The first model, Systems Approach to Land Use Sustainability (SALUS), is a process-based crop growth model used to predict pasture regrowth based on soil, climate, and management data. The second model, Morphogenetic and Digestibility of Pasture (MDP), uses paddock-scale values of herbage mass as input to predict leaf morphogenesis and forage nutritive value. Two field experiments were carried out on tall fescue- and ryegrass-based pastures under rotational grazing with lactating dairy cattle. The first experiment was conducted at plot scale and was used to calibrate the UAV and to test models. The second experiment was conducted at field scale and was used to test the UAV’s ability to predict pasture biomass under grazing rotation. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) calculated from the UAV’s multispectral reflectance (n = 72) was strongly correlated (p < 0.001) to plot measurements of pasture biomass (R2 = 0.80) within the range of ~226 and 4208 kg DM ha-1. Moreover, there was no difference (root mean square error, RMSE < 500 kg DM ha-1) between biomass estimations by the UAV (1971±350 kg ha-1) and two conventional methods used as control, the C-Dax proximal sensor (2073±636 kg ha-1) and ruler (2017±530 kg ha-1). The UAV approach was capable of mapping at high resolution (6 cm) the spatial variability of pasture (16 ha). The integrated UAV-modeling approach properly predicted spatial and temporal changes in pasture biomass (RMSE = 509 kg DM ha-1, CCC = 0.94), leaf length (RMSE = 6.2 cm, CCC = 0.62), leaf stage (RMSE = 0.7 leaves, CCC = 0.65), neutral detergent fiber (RMSE = 3%, CCC = 0.71), digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (RMSE = 8%, CCC = 0.92) and digestibility of dry matter (RMSE = 5%, CCC = 0.93) with reasonable precision and accuracy. These findings therefore suggest potential for the present UAV-modeling approach for use as decision support tool to allocate animals based on spatially and temporally explicit predictions of pasture biomass and nutritive value.

[1]  T. Carlson,et al.  On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index , 1997 .

[2]  M. Callow,et al.  Dry matter yield, forage quality and persistence of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) cultivars compared with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in a subtropical environment , 2003 .

[3]  E. Laca.  Foraging in a heterogeneous environment: intake and diet choice , 2008 .

[4]  M. Agnusdei,et al.  Morphological, environmental and management factors affecting nutritive value of tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) , 2018 .

[5]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  The effects of season and management on the growth of grass swards , 1988 .

[6]  James W. Jones,et al.  Development, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the simple SALUS crop model in DSSAT , 2013 .

[7]  John Stanley Bircham,et al.  Herbage growth and utilisation under continuous stocking management , 1981 .

[8]  López-Díaz,et al.  Measuring Herbage Mass by Non-Destructive Methods： A Review , 2011 .

[9]  G. Waghorn,et al.  Interaction between plant physiology and pasture feeding value: a review , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[10]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Estimating leaf carotenoid content in vineyards using high resolution hyperspectral imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) , 2013 .

[11]  D. Cammarano,et al.  Tradeoffs between Maize Silage Yield and Nitrate Leaching in a Mediterranean Nitrate-Vulnerable Zone under Current and Projected Climate Scenarios , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  Cameron E. F. Clark,et al.  Original paper: Use of a pasture growth model to estimate herbage mass at a paddock scale and assist management on dairy farms , 2010 .

[13]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Visible and Near‐Infrared Reflectance Assessment of Salinity Effects on Barley , 1997 .

[14]  P. V. Soest.  Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant , 1994 .

[15]  D. Chapman.  Using Ecophysiology to Improve Farm Efficiency: Application in Temperate Dairy Grazing Systems , 2016 .

[16]  M. Agnusdei,et al.  Leaf morphogenesis influences nutritive-value dynamics of tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) cultivars of different leaf softness , 2017, Crop and Pasture Science.

[17]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  REMOTE SENSING OF VEGETATION FROM UAV PLATFORMS USING LIGHTWEIGHT MULTISPECTRAL AND THERMAL IMAGING SENSORS , 2009 .

[18]  B. Basso,et al.  Modeling the Nutritive Value of Defoliated Tall Fescue Pastures Based on Leaf Morphogenesis , 2019, Agronomy Journal.

[19]  Brian Machovina,et al.  UAV remote sensing of spatial variation in banana production , 2016, Crop and Pasture Science.

[20]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Unmanned aerial platform-based multi-spectral imaging for field phenotyping of maize , 2015, Plant Methods.

[21]  J. Hodgson,et al.  The influence of sward condition on rates of herbage growth and senescence in mixed swards under continuous stocking management , 1983 .

[22]  J. Michaelsen,et al.  Estimating grassland biomass and leaf area index using ground and satellite data , 1994 .

[23]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Simulating crop growth and biogeochemical fluxes in response to land management using the SALUS model , 2015 .

[24]  B. Basso,et al.  Spatial evaluation of switchgrass productivity under historical and future climate scenarios in Michigan , 2017 .

[25]  G. Lemaire,et al.  Interactions between leaf lifespan and defoliation frequency in temperate and tropical pastures: a review , 2009 .

[26]  Dj Donaghy,et al.  Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence - key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review , 2001 .

[27]  R. Melchiori,et al.  Spatio‐Temporal Nitrogen Fertilizer Response in Maize: Field Study and Modeling Approach , 2016 .

[28]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Assessing and Modeling Pasture Growth under Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Defoliation Rates in Argentina and the United States , 2019, Agronomy Journal.

[29]  Ole Wendroth,et al.  Assessment of Pasture Biomass with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index from Active Ground-Based Sensors , 2008 .

[30]  Michael Jones,et al.  The Grass Crop. The Physiological Basis of Production. , 1988 .

[31]  K. Lowe,et al.  Performance of temperate perennial pastures in the Australian subtropics 1. Yield, persistence and pasture quality , 1999 .

[32]  Douglas L. Karlen,et al.  Crop Residue Management Challenges: A Special Issue Overview , 2019, Agronomy Journal.

[33]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring the Vernal Advancement and Retrogradation (Green Wave Effect) of Natural Vegetation. [Great Plains Corridor] , 1973 .

[34]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Remote sensing of biomass and yield of winter wheat under different nitrogen supplies , 2000 .

[35]  M. Wachendorf,et al.  Remote sensing as a tool to assess botanical composition, structure, quantity and quality of temperate grasslands , 2018 .

[36]  B. Cullen,et al.  Changes in nutritive characteristics associated with plant height, and nutrient selection by dairy cows grazing four perennial pasture grasses , 2017 .

[37]  B. Ma,et al.  Early prediction of soybean yield from canopy reflectance measurements , 2001 .

[38]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Estimating plant distance in maize using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) , 2018, PloS one.

[39]  Luis Orlindo Tedeschi,et al.  Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models , 2006 .

[40]  S. Hamilton,et al.  The Ecology of Agricultural Landscapes: Long-Term Research on the Path to Sustainability , 2015 .

[41]  C. Clark,et al.  Pasture growth model to assist management on dairy farms: Testing the concept with farmers , 2013 .

[42]  W. J. Fulkerson,et al.  Benefits of accurately allocating feed on a daily basis to dairy cows grazing pasture , 2005 .

[43]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Simulation of Tillage Systems Impact on Soil Biophysical Properties Using the SALUS Model , 2006 .

[44]  C E F Clark,et al.  Differential rumination, intake, and enteric methane production of dairy cows in a pasture-based automatic milking system. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[45]  D. Chapman,et al.  Regrowth dynamics and grazing decision rules: further analysis for dairy production systems based on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) pastures , 2012 .