Science map of Cochrane systematic reviews receiving the most altmetric attention: network visualization and machine learning perspective

Introduction: We aim to visualize and analyze the science map of Cochrane systematic reviews with the high altmetric attention scores. Methods: On 10 May 2019, altmetric data of Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews obtained from Altmetric database (Altmetric LLP, London, UK). Bibliometric data of top 5% Cochrane systematic reviews further extracted from Web of Science. keyword co-occurrence, co-authorship and co-citation network visualization were then employed using VOSviewer software. Decision tree and random forest model were used to analyze citations pattern. Results: 12016 Cochrane systematic reviews with Altmetric attention are found (total mentions=259,968). Twitter was the most popular altmetric resource among these articles. Consequently, the top 5% (607 articles, mean altmetric score= 171.2, Confidence Level (CL) 95%= 14.4, mean citations= 42.1, CL 95%= 1.3) with the highest Altmetric score are included in the study. Keyword co-occurrence network visualization showed female, adult and child as the most accurate keywords respectively. At author level, Helen V Worthington had the greatest impact on the network. At organization and country levels, University of Oxford and U.K had the greatest impact on the network in turn. Co-citation network analysis showed that Lancet and Cochrane database of systematic reviews had the most influence on the network. However, altmetric score do not correlate with citations (r=0.15) (Figure 7), it does correlate with policy document mentions (r=0.61). Results of decision tree and random forest model (a machine learning algorithm) confirmed importance of policy document mentions. Discussion: Despite popularity of Cochrane systematic reviews in Twittersphere, disappointingly, they rarely shared and discussed in newly emerging academic tools (e.g. F1000 prime, Publons and PubPeer). Overall, Wikipedia mentions were low among Cochrane systematic reviews, considering the established partnership between Wikipedia and Cochrane collaboration. Newly emerging and groundbreaking concepts, e.g. genomic medicine, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence not that admired among hot topics. Keywords: Cochrane systematic review, Altmetrics, Science map, Twitter, Facebook, Social media, Citation, Policy document, Network visualization, Decision tree, Random forest, Machine learning.

[1]  A. Masri,et al.  Correlation of Altmetric Attention Score With Article Citations in Cardiovascular Research. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Richard Duszak,et al.  Alternative Metrics ("Altmetrics") for Assessing Article Impact in Popular General Radiology Journals. , 2017, Academic radiology.

[3]  S. Barbic,et al.  An Analysis of Altmetrics in Emergency Medicine. , 2016, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  Jia You,et al.  Scientific community. Who are the science stars of Twitter? , 2014, Science.

[5]  Peiling Wang,et al.  A correlation comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and citations for six PLOS journals , 2018, PloS one.

[6]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) , 2017, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[7]  Correlation of Altmetric Attention Score and Citations for High-Impact General Medicine Journals: a Cross-sectional Study , 2019, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  S. Golder,et al.  A systematic scoping review of the evidence for consumer involvement in organisations undertaking systematic reviews: focus on Cochrane , 2016, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[9]  A. Baheti,et al.  Altmetrics: A Measure of Social Attention toward Scientific Research. , 2017, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[10]  Jeffrey B. Geske,et al.  An Academic Healthcare Twitter Account: The Mayo Clinic Experience , 2016, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  A Vissink,et al.  Measuring the social impact of dental research: An insight into the most influential articles on the Web. , 2017, Oral diseases.

[12]  J. Mccambridge,et al.  Industry Use of Evidence to Influence Alcohol Policy: A Case Study of Submissions to the 2008 Scottish Government Consultation , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[13]  Theodore D Cosco,et al.  Medical journals, impact and social media: an ecological study of the Twittersphere , 2015, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[14]  Neil Hall,et al.  The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists , 2014, Genome Biology.

[15]  Naif M. Alotaibi,et al.  The Spectrum of Altmetrics in Neurosurgery: The Top 100 "Trending" Articles in Neurosurgical Journals. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[16]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  The Evolution of Current Research Impact Metrics: From Bibliometrics to Altmetrics? , 2017, Clinical spine surgery.

[17]  S. Khazaei,et al.  Altmetric analysis of contemporary dental literature , 2018, BDJ.

[19]  Liz Allen,et al.  Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact , 2014, PLoS biology.

[20]  Graham J. Williams Data Mining with Rattle and R: The Art of Excavating Data for Knowledge Discovery , 2011 .

[21]  R. Kelishadi,et al.  Altmetric Analysis of Contemporary Iranian Medical Journals , 2019, International journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  Rahmi Oklu,et al.  Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare , 2018, Journal of clinical medicine.

[23]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Academic information on Twitter: A user survey , 2018, PloS one.

[24]  Jafar Kolahi Altmetrics: A new emerging issue for dental research scientists , 2015 .

[25]  Heather Murray More than 2 billion pairs of eyeballs: Why aren’t you sharing medical knowledge on Wikipedia? , 2018, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

[26]  S. Azer,et al.  Top-cited articles in medical professionalism: a bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores , 2019, BMJ Open.

[27]  S. Khazaei,et al.  Analysis of highly tweeted dental journals and articles: a science mapping approach , 2019, British Dental Journal.

[28]  Jian Wang,et al.  Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation , 2013, Scientometrics.

[29]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  S. Khazaei,et al.  Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 2014 , 2016, BDJ.