Three Factors to Signal Non‐Response Bias With Applications to Categorical Auxiliary Variables

Summary Non-response causes bias in survey estimates. The unknown bias can be reduced, for example as in this paper by the use of a calibration estimator built on powerful auxiliary information. Still, some bias will always remain. A bias reduction indicator is proposed and expressed as a product of three factors reflecting familiar statistical ideas. These factors provide a useful perspective on the components that constitute non-response bias in estimates. To illustrate the indicator, we focus on the important case with information defined by one or more categorical auxiliary variables, each expressed by two or more properties or traits. Together, the auxiliary variables may represent a large number of traits, more or less important for bias reduction. An examination of the three factors of the bias reduction indicator brings the insight that the ultimate auxiliary vector for calibration need not or should not contain all available traits; some are unimportant or detrimental to bias reduction. The question becomes one of selection of traits, not of complete auxiliary variables. Empirical examples are given, and a stepwise procedure for selecting important traits is proposed.

[1]  Jae Kwang Kim,et al.  Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probability , 2007 .

[2]  Evaluation and Selection of Models for Attrition Nonresponse Adjustment , 2010 .

[3]  Andreas Karlsson,et al.  Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse , 2007, Technometrics.

[4]  B. Schouten A selection strategy for weighting variables under a not-missing-at-random assumption , 2007 .

[5]  Carl-Erik Särndal,et al.  The 2010 Morris Hansen lecture dealing with survey nonresponse in data collection, in estimation , 2011 .

[6]  R. Chambers,et al.  Adaptive calibration for prediction of finite population totals , 2008 .

[7]  R. Little,et al.  Does Weighting for Nonresponse Increase the Variance of Survey Means? (Conference Paper) , 2004 .

[8]  P. Kott Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonresponse and Coverage Errors , 2006 .

[9]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  Nonresponse and Weighting , 2009 .

[10]  Sixten Lundström,et al.  Assessing Auxiliary Vectors for Control of Nonresponse Bias in the Calibration Estimator , 2008 .

[11]  Chris J. Skinner,et al.  Variable selection for regression estimation in finite populations , 1997 .

[12]  Jean D. Opsomer,et al.  Properties of the weighting cell estimator under a nonparametric response mechanism , 2004 .

[13]  P. Kott Some research on calibration estimators at the National Agricultural Statistics Service , 2008 .

[14]  Sixten Lundström,et al.  Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse: Särndal/Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse , 2005 .

[15]  J. Brick,et al.  Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias , 2008 .