Visual Categorization and Object Representation in Monkeys and Humans

We investigated the influence of a categorization task on the extraction and representation of perceptual features in humans and monkeys. The use of parameterized stimuli (schematic faces and fish) with fixed diagnostic features in combination with a similarity-rating task allowed us to demonstrate perceptual sensitization to the diagnostic dimensions of the categorization task for the monkeys. Moreover, our results reveal important similarities between human and monkey visual subordinate categorization strategies. Neither the humans nor the monkeys compared the new stimuli to class prototypes or based their decisions on conditional probabilities along stimulus dimensions. Instead, they classified each object according to its similarity to familiar members of the alternative categories, or with respect to its position to a linear boundary between the learned categories.

[1]  J. Gaddum.  Probit Analysis , 1948, Nature.

[2]  R. Shepard.  Stimulus and response generalization: tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[4]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Perceptual vs conceptual categorization , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[6]  B. Richmond,et al.  Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method , 1980, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Medin,et al.  Linear separability in classification learning. , 1981 .

[8]  A. Wright,et al.  Pictorial similarity judgments and the organization of visual memory in the rhesus monkey. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  R. Nosofsky.  Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Exemplar-based approach to relating categorization, identification, and recognition , 1992 .

[13]  P. Schyns,et al.  The Ontogeny of Part Representation in Object Concepts , 1994 .

[14]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  A. Wright,et al.  Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) learn category matching in a nonidentical same-different task. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[17]  P. Groenen,et al.  The tunneling method for global optimization in multidimensional scaling , 1996 .

[18]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .

[20]  Maddox Wt,et al.  Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: comment on McKinley and Nosofsky (1996). , 1998 .

[21]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: Reply to Maddox and Ashby (1998). , 1998 .

[22]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation of objective similarity among three-dimensional shapes in the monkey , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Functional and structural mapping of human cerebral cortex: solutions are in the surfaces. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  W T Maddox,et al.  Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: comment on McKinley and Nosofsky (1996). , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys , 1998, Neuroreport.

[27]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  R. Vogels.  Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 1: behavioural study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  R. Vogels.  Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single‐cell study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 1999 .

[31]  G Richard,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans , 2000, Vision Research.

[32]  N. Sigala,et al.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex , 2002, Nature.

[33]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Categorical perception of familiar objects , 2002, Cognition.

[34]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Visual Neurons: Categorization-Based Selectivity , 2002, Current Biology.

[35]  C. Koch,et al.  Human visual object categorization can be described by models with low memory capacity , 2003, Vision Research.

[36]  Alexander Maier,et al.  Perception of Temporally Interleaved Ambiguous Patterns , 2003, Current Biology.

[37]  S. Kéri.  The cognitive neuroscience of category learning , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[38]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE ON VISUAL DISCRIMINATION , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[39]  C. Pernet,et al.  Neural timing of visual implicit categorization. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.