Integrated Design and Control of Various Hydrogen Production Flowsheet Configurations via Membrane Based Methane Steam Reforming

This work focuses on the development and implementation of an integrated process design and control framework for a membrane-based hydrogen production system based on low temperature methane steam reforming. Several alternative flowsheet configurations consisted of either integrated membrane reactor modules or successive reactor and membrane separation modules are designed and assessed by considering economic and controller dynamic performance criteria simultaneously. The design problem is expressed as a non-linear dynamic optimization problem incorporating a nonlinear dynamic model for the process system and a linear model predictive controller aiming to maintain the process targets despite the effect of disturbances. The large dimensionality of the disturbance space is effectively addressed by focusing on disturbances along the direction that causes the maximum process variability revealed by the analysis of local sensitivity information for the process system. Design results from a multi-objective optimization study, where only the annualized equipment and operational costs are minimized, are used as reference case in order to evaluate the proposed design framework. Optimization results demonstrate the controller’s ability to track the imposed setpoint changes and alleviate the effects of multiple simultaneous disturbances. Also, significant economic improvements are observed by the implementation of the integrated design and control framework compared to the traditional design methodology, where process and controller design are performed sequentially.

[1]  Esmail M. A. Mokheimer,et al.  Thermo-economic analysis of integrated membrane-SMR ITM-oxy-combustion hydrogen and power production plant , 2017 .

[2]  J. D. Silva Dynamic Simulation of the Steam Reforming of Methane for the Production of Hydrogen in a Catalytic Fixed Bed Membrane Reactor , 2014 .

[3]  Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval,et al.  Application of Robust Control Tools to the Simultaneous Design and Control of Dynamic Systems , 2009 .

[4]  S. Voutetakis,et al.  Investigating the simultaneous process design and control of a membrane reactor for hydrogen production via methane steam reforming , 2017 .

[5]  Peter Klaver,et al.  Oxygen evolution at hematite surfaces : the impact of structure and oxygen vacancies on lowering the overpotential , 2016 .

[6]  R. A. Freeman,et al.  Quantitative overdesign of chemical processes , 1975 .

[7]  Spyros Voutetakis,et al.  Optimization of an experimental membrane reactor for low-temperature methane steam reforming , 2016, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[8]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty , 1996 .

[9]  Hannes Jónsson,et al.  Solar hydrogen production with semiconductor metal oxides: new directions in experiment and theory. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[10]  Anja Bieberle-Hütter,et al.  Modeling and Simulations in Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation: From Single Level to Multiscale Modeling. , 2016, ChemSusChem.

[11]  Fausto Gallucci,et al.  Direct route from ethanol to pure hydrogen through autothermal reforming in a membrane reactor: Experimental demonstration, reactor modelling and design , 2018 .

[12]  Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval,et al.  Simultaneous Design and Control under Uncertainty Using Model Predictive Control , 2013 .

[13]  Francesco Paolo Di Maio,et al.  Optimization of membrane area and catalyst distribution in a permeative-stage membrane reactor for methane steam reforming , 2008 .

[14]  Geoff Barton,et al.  Interaction between process design and process control: economic analysis of process dynamics , 1991 .

[15]  François Maréchal,et al.  Thermo‐Economic Modelling and Optimisation of Fuel Cell Systems , 2005 .

[16]  P. Christofides,et al.  Model Predictive Control of a Steam Methane Reforming Reactor Described by a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model , 2017 .

[17]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Selection of process control structure based on linear dynamic economics , 1993 .

[18]  Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval,et al.  An MPC-based control structure selection approach for simultaneous process and control design , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[19]  Michael Patrascu,et al.  Design concepts of a scaled-down autothermal membrane reformer for on board hydrogen production , 2015 .

[20]  Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval,et al.  Integration of Design and Control of Dynamic Systems under Uncertainty: A New Back-Off Approach , 2016 .

[21]  E. Bristol On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control , 1966 .

[22]  P. Seferlis,et al.  System poles and zeros sensitivity for dynamic process controllability , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[23]  M. Soroush,et al.  Model Predictive Control Tuning Methods: A Review , 2010 .

[24]  Rafiqul Gani,et al.  State‐of‐the‐art and progress in the optimization‐based simultaneous design and control for chemical processes , 2012 .

[25]  Ioannis K. Kookos,et al.  An Algorithm for Simultaneous Process Design and Control , 2001 .

[26]  N. Munro,et al.  PID controllers: recent tuning methods and design to specification , 2002 .

[27]  Maria Cristina Annesini,et al.  Transport-reaction-permeation regimes in catalytic membrane reactors for hydrogen production. The steam reforming of methane as a case study , 2017 .

[28]  Silvana Revollar,et al.  Integrated design and control of chemical processes - Part I: Revision and classification , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[29]  Peter L. Douglas,et al.  Simultaneous design and control of processes under uncertainty: A robust modelling approach , 2008 .

[30]  D. P. Atherton,et al.  Automatic tuning of optimum PID controllers , 1993 .

[31]  Marc M. J. van de Wal,et al.  A review of methods for input/output selection , 2001, Autom..

[32]  Maria Cristina Annesini,et al.  Designing the optimal geometry of a membrane reactor for hydrogen production from a pre-reformed gas mixture based on the extent of the reaction boundary layer , 2017 .

[33]  Mohammad Farsi,et al.  A modified membrane SMR reactor to produce large-scale syngas: modeling and multi objective optimization , 2015 .

[34]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design , 1997 .

[35]  Simira Papadopoulou,et al.  Enhancement of pure hydrogen production through the use of a membrane reactor , 2014 .

[36]  Simira Papadopoulou,et al.  Model Predictive Control for Hydrogen Production in a Membrane Methane Steam Reforming Reactor , 2016 .

[37]  Johan Grievink,et al.  Process design and control structure screening based on economic and static controllability criteria , 2001 .

[38]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Process control structure selection based on economics , 2000 .

[39]  Mahdi Sharifzadeh,et al.  Integration of process design and control: A review , 2013 .

[40]  Stanley M. Walas,et al.  Chemical Process Equipment : Selection and Design , 1988 .

[41]  Thomas A. Adams,et al.  A multi-scale dynamic two-dimensional heterogeneous model for catalytic steam methane reforming reactors , 2013 .

[42]  Johan Grievink,et al.  Chapter B6 - Process design and control structure evaluation and screening using nonlinear sensitivity analysis , 2004 .