Interpretation of SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion images: common artifacts and quality control techniques.

Nuclear medicine has long played an important role in the noninvasive evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease. The development of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) led to improved assessments of myocardial perfusion, and the use of electrocardiographic gating made accurate measurements of ventricular wall motion, ejection fractions, and ventricular volumes possible. With the use of hybrid SPECT/computed tomography (CT) scanning systems, the cardiac functional parameters can be measured in a single imaging session. These recent advances in imaging technology have not only enhanced image quality but also improved diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in the detection of clinically relevant coronary artery disease. The CT-based attenuation maps obtained with hybrid SPECT/CT systems also have been useful for improving diagnostic accuracy. However, when attenuation correction and other advanced image data postprocessing techniques are used, unexpected artifacts may arise. The artifacts most commonly encountered are related to the characteristics either of the technology or of the patient. Thus, close attention to the details of acquisition protocols, processing techniques, and image interpretation is needed to ensure high diagnostic quality in myocardial perfusion studies.

[1]  S. Underwood,et al.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2004, Heart.

[2]  Frans J. Th. Wackers,et al.  Clinical validation of SPECT attenuation correction using x-ray computed tomography—derived attenuation maps: Multicenter clinical trial with angiographic correlation , 2005, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[3]  Ernest V. Garcia,et al.  Nuclear Cardiac Imaging: Principles and Applications , 1987 .

[4]  E. Ficaro,et al.  Clinical review of attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[5]  Steven Burrell,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[6]  Gethin Williams,et al.  Left bundle-branch block artifact on single photon emission computed tomography with technetium Tc 99m (Tc-99m) agents: mechanisms and a method to decrease false-positive interpretations. , 2006, American heart journal.

[7]  J. C. Meneghetti,et al.  Exercise supplementation to dipyridamole prevents hypotension, improves electrocardiogram sensitivity, and increases heart-to-liver activity ratio on Tc-99m sestamibi imaging , 2001, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  S. Underwood,et al.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging , 2003, Nuclear medicine communications.

[9]  Guido Germano,et al.  Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  R. Kerensky,et al.  Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, causes dose-dependent increases in coronary blood flow velocity in humans , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  P. Barnes,et al.  Safety of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist for myocardial perfusion imaging, in mild asthma and moderate asthma patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[12]  S. Houle Nuclear Cardiac Imaging: Principles and Applications , 1987 .

[13]  R. Hendel,et al.  Impact of an abbreviated adenosine protocol incorporating adjunctive treadmill exercise on adverse effects and image quality in patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging , 2000, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[14]  E. Depuey Chapter 5 – Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Artifacts , 2010 .

[15]  S. Blum,et al.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  F. Bengel,et al.  Attenuation Correction in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT/CT: Effects of Misregistration and Value of Reregistration , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  G. Thomas,et al.  Treadmill exercise during adenosine infusion is safe, results in fewer adverse reactions, and improves myocardial perfusion image quality , 2000, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  R. Druz Current advances in vasodilator pharmacological stress perfusion imaging. , 2009, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[19]  M. Henzlova,et al.  The prognosis of a normal stress-only Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging study , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[20]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Myocardial perfusion and function single photon emission computed tomography , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[21]  L. Husmann,et al.  Improved Outcome Prediction by SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging After CT Attenuation Correction , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  R. Hendel,et al.  The impact of adjunctive adenosine infusion during exercise myocardial perfusion imaging: Results of the Both Exercise and Adenosine Stress Test (BEAST) trial , 2003, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[23]  O. Israel,et al.  Directions and Magnitudes of Misregistration of CT Attenuation-Corrected Myocardial Perfusion Studies: Incidence, Impact on Image Quality, and Guidance for Reregistration , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  L. Belardinelli,et al.  Novel short-acting A2A adenosine receptor agonists for coronary vasodilation: inverse relationship between affinity and duration of action of A2A agonists. , 2001, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[25]  Guido Germano,et al.  Combined quantitative supine-prone myocardial perfusion spect improves detection of coronary artery disease and normalcy rates in women , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[26]  R. Hendel,et al.  Impact of limited treadmill exercise on adenosine Tc-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  G. Thomas,et al.  Safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RegCOPD trial) , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.