The effects of data entry structure on patients' perceptions of information quality in Health Information Exchange (HIE)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To exchange patient health information using Health Information Exchange (HIE) projects, such information first should be collected thoroughly using an appropriate data entry interface that reinforces information quality (IQ). Assessment of the given data interface based on its structure level may give us a better understanding of patients' attitudes toward information-sharing efforts. The main objective of this study is to examine the effects of data structure on perceptions and attitudes of patients toward the quality of health information that may be shared through HIE networks. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight experiments were conducted to examine the impact of different design of information collection interfaces (structured vs. unstructured) to record two types of health information (sensitive vs. non-sensitive) that can be used for two types of sharing purposes (health care vs. marketing). RESULTS Results show that the degree of data entry structure can significantly influence patients' perceptions of completeness, accuracy, psychological risk, accessibility of data, concise representation, and understandability of health information. DISCUSSION There is a connection between data entry interface design and patients' perceptions of the quality of health information used in HIE networks, which in turn, could lead to the development of best practices in interface design and data collection techniques. This may also improve interactions between patients and healthcare entities, enhance patients' attitudes toward data collection procedures and HIE, and help healthcare providers use complete and accurate databases. CONCLUSIONS We propose that healthcare professionals can tailor data entry interfaces based on the sensitivity of medical data and the purpose of information exchange.

[1]  Changyong Liang,et al.  Visualizing the knowledge structure and evolution of big data research in healthcare informatics , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Jie Xu,et al.  The experience and challenges of healthcare-reform-driven medical consortia and Regional Health Information Technologies in China: A longitudinal study , 2019, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Brian T. Wymbs,et al.  Screening Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for Adults With ADHD , 2019, Journal of attention disorders.

[5]  Ajwinder Singh,et al.  Measuring healthcare service quality from patients’ perspective: using Fuzzy AHP application , 2019 .

[6]  C. Kruse,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Big Data in Health Care: A Systematic Review , 2016, JMIR medical informatics.

[7]  Hua Xu,et al.  Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Johanna Kaipio,et al.  Health information exchange in Finland: Usage of different access types and predictors of paper use , 2019, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Zhaohua Deng,et al.  Understanding consumer health information-seeking behavior from the perspective of the risk perception attitude framework and social support in mobile social media websites , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  C. de Pietro,et al.  E-health in Switzerland: The laborious adoption of the federal law on electronic health records (EHR) and health information exchange (HIE) networks. , 2017, Health policy.

[11]  Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh,et al.  The Process of Building Patient Trust in Health Information Exchange (HIE): The Impacts of Perceived Benefits, Perceived Transparency of Privacy Policy, and Familiarity , 2019, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh,et al.  Comparison of consumers' perspectives on different health information exchange (HIE) mechanisms: an experimental study , 2018, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Jesse J. Chandler,et al.  Inside the Turk , 2014 .

[14]  Jay G Ronquillo,et al.  Health IT, hacking, and cybersecurity: national trends in data breaches of protected health information , 2018, JAMIA open.

[15]  J. Rioux,et al.  Patients' perception of their involvement in shared treatment decision making: Key factors in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[16]  D. Harrison McKnight,et al.  Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Integrating Service Quality with System and Information Quality: An Empirical Test in the E-Service Context , 2013, MIS Q..

[18]  David Gefen,et al.  The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Casey Erdmier,et al.  Wearable device implications in the healthcare industry , 2016, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[20]  Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan,et al.  Secured Data Collection With Hardware-Based Ciphers for IoT-Based Healthcare , 2019, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[21]  María Adela Grando,et al.  State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[22]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[23]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[24]  Mark Rhinard,et al.  European security and early warning systems: from risks to threats in the European Union’s health security sector , 2018 .

[25]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh,et al.  Consumers’ Perceptions of Using Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) for Research Purposes , 2019, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[27]  Kelly Caine,et al.  Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[28]  Tara S. Behrend,et al.  The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Qing Zhu,et al.  Health information privacy concerns, antecedents, and information disclosure intention in online health communities , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Mohamad I Haque,et al.  Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skills: an opportunity for improvement in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills. , 2016, American journal of surgery.

[31]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[32]  Amar Cheema,et al.  Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples , 2013 .

[33]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Multi-EMR Structured Data Entry Form: User-Acceptance Testing of a Prototype , 2017, ITCH.

[34]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Gaps in health information exchange between hospitals that treat many shared patients , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[35]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  A framework for information quality assessment , 2007 .

[36]  R. Rudd,et al.  Improving low health literacy and patient engagement: A social ecological approach. , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[37]  Yaron Denekamp,et al.  Governmental intervention in Hospital Information Exchange (HIE) diffusion: a quasi-experimental ARIMA interrupted time series analysis of monthly HIE patient penetration rates , 2019, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Are Consumers More Likely to Contribute Online Reviews for Hit or Niche Products? , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Elizabeth M. Poposki,et al.  Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys , 2012 .

[40]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[41]  Alexander I. Rudnicky,et al.  Using the Amazon Mechanical Turk for transcription of spoken language , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[42]  Elizabeth M Briones,et al.  An examination of the equivalency of self-report measures obtained from crowdsourced versus undergraduate student samples , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[43]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Concern for Information Privacy and Online Consumer Purchasing , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Karoline Mortensen,et al.  Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature , 2018, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[45]  Viju Raghupathi,et al.  Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential , 2014, Health Information Science and Systems.

[46]  Yichuan Wang,et al.  An integrated big data analytics-enabled transformation model: Application to health care , 2018, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Kitty S. Chan,et al.  Review: Electronic Health Records and the Reliability and Validity of Quality Measures: A Review of the Literature , 2010, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[49]  Hong Yu,et al.  A Natural Language Processing System That Links Medical Terms in Electronic Health Record Notes to Lay Definitions: System Development Using Physician Reviews , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[50]  K. Theander,et al.  Patient participation during and after a self-management programme in primary healthcare - The experience of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic heart failure. , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[51]  Yangyong Zhu,et al.  The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era , 2015, Data Sci. J..

[52]  Raymond Johnson,et al.  Advancing cognitive engineering methods to support user interface design for electronic health records , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[53]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A nomological network of customers’ privacy perceptions: linking artifact design to shopping efficiency , 2018, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Jens H. Weber,et al.  Conditions potentially sensitive to a Personal Health Record (PHR) intervention, a systematic review , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[55]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .