Project Management Improvement Efforts—Creating Project Management Value by Uniqueness or Mainstream Thinking?

This paper presents a research study that is part of the large international Project Management Institute (PMI)-sponsored research project the “Value of Project Management.” Three case studies have been conducted on Norwegian enterprises. This article focuses on how enterprises improve project management and presents the improvement efforts and the stated reasons behind them. There are striking similarities as to the prioritized ways the enterprises have chosen to make improvements: use of a rather standardized model for project work and internal schooling activities. The enterprises all explain their efforts as internally driven, even if some consultancy assistance was used. This article discusses three drivers behind the improvement efforts: an economic perspective, a new institutionalism perspective, and an innovation perspective. This article identifies indicators pointing to all drivers and helps us understand why and how enterprises are improving project management. The importance of research on the practice of the most capable enterprises within the project management field is acknowledged.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  F. E. Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[3]  James G. March,et al.  Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[4]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Pernille Eskerod,et al.  Why Do Companies Standardize Project Work , 2000 .

[6]  A. Davies,et al.  Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions , 2000 .

[7]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[8]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[9]  D. Hodgson Disciplining the Professional: The Case of Project Management , 2002 .

[10]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[11]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[12]  Alice Lam Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework , 2000 .

[13]  J. Thomas,et al.  Understanding the Value of Project Management: First Steps on an International Investigation in Search of Value , 2007 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[15]  J. Spender Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Whence and Whither? , 2008 .

[16]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  Exploring the role of formal bodies of knowledge in defining a profession – The case of project management , 2006 .

[17]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[18]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Lessons from Experience: Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies , 1996 .

[19]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.