Ernst Abbe's Scientific Management: Theoretical Insights from a Nineteenth-Century Dynamic Capabilities Approach

'Scientific management' is the label Frederick Taylor attached to the system of shop-floor management devised by him. In this article we present our discovery of very different 'scientific' management principles that, roughly concurrently with Taylorism, were developed by German physicist-turned-manager Ernst Abbe and that are codified in the statutes of the Carl Zeiss Foundation created by Abbe. They exhibit striking parallels to resource- and capability-based theories of the firm, and indicate managerial challenges that warrant further theoretical elaboration. Abbe develops an account for managing a science-based firm and securing its long-term competitiveness, giving detailed prescriptions with regard to the type and scope of a firm's activities, its organizational set-up and its labor relations. We highlight some of the most characteristic features of Abbe's thought, discuss its effects on the development of the firms owned by the Zeiss Foundation, and compare it to and draw out implications for present-day management theory. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[2]  Joseph L. Bower,et al.  From resource allocation to strategy , 2005 .

[3]  S. Winter,et al.  CAPABILITIES , TRANSACTION COSTS , AND EVOLUTION : UNDERSTANDING THE INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF PRODUCTION , 2003 .

[4]  W. Bodmer Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[5]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[6]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[7]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[8]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[9]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[10]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[11]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities , 2001 .

[12]  Paul Windrum Heterogeneous preferences and new innovation cycles in mature industries: the camera industry 1955-1974 , 2004 .

[13]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[14]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[15]  C. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions , 2005 .

[16]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[17]  Murmann Knowledge and competitive advantage , 2003 .

[18]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[19]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[20]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[22]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments , 2001 .

[23]  William Lazonick,et al.  Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor , 1992 .

[24]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[25]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[26]  Friedrich A. von Hayek,et al.  Rules and order , 1973 .

[27]  K. Popper,et al.  The Open Society and Its Enemies , 1946 .

[28]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .

[29]  S. Lenway,et al.  Knowledge and competitive advantage, the coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions , 2003 .

[30]  Stephen Hill,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm , 1981 .

[31]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  DID SOCIALISM FAIL TO INNOVATE ? A NATURAL EXPERIMENT OF THE TWO ZEISS COMPANIES * , 1999 .

[32]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[33]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[34]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[35]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product Development in the World Auto Industry , 1987 .

[36]  R. Langlois Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time , 1992 .

[37]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[38]  U. Witt Imagination and leadership – The neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm , 1998 .

[39]  Rolf Walter,et al.  Zeiss 1905-1945 , 2000 .

[40]  Nicholas Argyres EVIDENCE ON THE ROLE OF FIRM CAPABILITIES IN VERTICAL INTEGRATION DECISIONS , 1996 .

[41]  J. Cottingham LAW, LEGISLATION AND LIBERTY , 1978 .

[42]  Edith Hellmuth,et al.  Zeiss 1846-1905: Vom Atelier für Mechanik zum führenden Unternehmen des optischen Gerätebaus , 1996 .