A new approach to measuring green growth: Application to the OECD and Korea

Abstract Green growth, or environmentally sustainable economic growth, is imperative in light of current environmental crises and resource depletion. Green indicators and statistics can measure environmentally sustainable development; they thus enable evaluating green growth and support its integration into policy. As such, this study uses an OECD framework to select a set of 12 indicators, designed for cross-country comparisons of green growth strategies. These indicators are assessed for 30 countries, including South Korea. Current data for each international indicator is compared to the 10th percentile of OECD countries and evaluated on a scale of 1–10. South Korea ranked 17th among the 30: its natural capital and quality of life indexes are relatively high, but its economic activity scores (production, consumption, and trade) are relatively low. These findings suggest that production and consumption processes must be made more environmentally and economically sustainable. Given that South Korea's green growth strategy currently emphasizes economic value, the country is moving in the right direction and our analysis projects that economic activity scores will rise in the future. This study offers a novel tool for measuring overall effects of green growth strategies, providing the information necessary to re-shape national economic plans based on current circumstances.

[1]  Michael Beckmann,et al.  Considerations on providing the energy needs using exclusively renewable sources: Energiewende in Germany , 2014 .

[2]  David Popp,et al.  The Role of Technological Change in Green Growth , 2012 .

[3]  Shu-li Huang,et al.  A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability , 1998 .

[4]  D. Bryant,et al.  Environmental indicators : a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development , 1995 .

[5]  S. Withers,et al.  Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Which to Choose? , 2014 .

[6]  Rudolf de Groot,et al.  Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks , 2008 .

[7]  A. Bagheri,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS INDICATORS TO MONITOR FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: PRACTICE TO AN URBAN WATER SYSTEM , 2007 .

[8]  Jean Hugé,et al.  Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanism projects in Vietnam , 2010 .

[9]  Matthew A. Cole,et al.  The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[10]  T. Sterner,et al.  Green growth in the post-Copenhagen climate , 2011 .

[11]  J. Macedo Planning a Sustainable City , 2013 .

[12]  E. Barbier How is the Global Green New Deal going? , 2010, Nature.

[13]  K. Lo A critical review of China's rapidly developing renewable energy and energy efficiency policies , 2014 .

[14]  Jerry Jia-Ruey Ou Construction of Green Competitiveness Analysis Index - A Case Study of Export Procession Zone , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag..

[15]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[16]  M. Fehr,et al.  Proposal of Indicators to Assess Urban Sustainability in Brazil , 2004 .