Reduction of small and large bowel irradiation using an optimized intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy technique in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE To investigate the role of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to irradiate the prostate gland and pelvic lymph nodes while sparing critical pelvic organs, and to optimize the number of beams required. METHODS AND MATERIALS Target, small bowel, colon, rectum, and bladder were outlined on CT planning scans of 10 men with prostate cancer. Optimized conventional (RT) and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans were created and compared to inverse-planned IMRT dose distributions using dose-volume histograms. Optimization of beam number was undertaken for the IMRT plans. RESULTS With RT the mean percentage volume of small bowel and colon receiving >45 Gy was 21.4 +/- 5.4%. For 3D-CRT it was 18.3 +/- 7.7% (p = 0.0043) and for 9-field IMRT it was 5.3 +/- 1.8% (p < 0.001 compared to 3D-CRT). For 7, 5, and 3 IMRT fields, it was 6.4 +/- 2.9%, 7.2 +/- 2.8%, and 8.4 +/- 3.8% (all p < 0.001 compared to 3D-CRT). The rectal volume irradiated >45 Gy was reduced from 50.5 +/- 16.3% (3D-CRT) to 5.8 +/- 2.1% by 9-field IMRT (p < 0. 001) and bladder from 52.2 +/- 12.8% to 7 +/- 2.8% (p < 0.001). Similar benefits were maintained for 7, 5, and 3 IMRT fields. CONCLUSIONS The reduction in critical pelvic organ irradiation seen with IMRT may reduce side effects in patients, and allow modest dose escalation within acceptable complication rates. These reductions were maintained with 3-5 IMRT field plans which potentially allow less complex delivery techniques and shorter delivery times.

[1]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  R Mohan,et al.  A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; ARCS vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Icru.  Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[4]  A L Boyer,et al.  Breast-conserving radiation therapy: potential of inverse planning with intensity modulation. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  K. Forster,et al.  Dosimetric verification of a commercial inverse treatment planning system. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R Martinez-Monge,et al.  Cross-sectional nodal atlas: a tool for the definition of clinical target volumes in three-dimensional radiation therapy planning. , 1999, Radiology.

[8]  J. Letschert.  The prevention of radiation-induced small bowel complications. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[9]  R W de Boer,et al.  Dose-volume correlation in radiation-related late small-bowel complications: a clinical study. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  J C Horiot,et al.  The volume effect in radiation-related late small bowel complications: results of a clinical study of the EORTC Radiotherapy Cooperative Group in patients treated for rectal carcinoma. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  A. Brahme,et al.  Which is the most suitable number of photon beam portals in coplanar radiation therapy? , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J L Bedford,et al.  A digital method for computing target margins in radiotherapy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  W. Sause,et al.  Elective pelvic irradiation in stage A2, B carcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG 77-06. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  J. Michalski,et al.  Nonrandomized evaluation of pelvic lymph node irradiation in localized carcinoma of the prostate. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  T. Kinsella,et al.  Tolerance of the intestine to radiation therapy. , 1980, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[16]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  K. Knopf,et al.  Relationship of acute gastrointestinal toxicity and the volume of irradiated small bowel in patients receiving combined modality therapy for rectal cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Number and orientations of beams in intensity-modulated radiation treatments. , 1997, Medical physics.

[19]  M. Martel,et al.  Comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer using conformal multisegmental fields: assessment of target coverage and noninvolved tissue sparing. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Complications in 831 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with 3,000 rads or more whole pelvis irradiation. , 1970, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[21]  S. Al-Askari,et al.  Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostatic cancer. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[22]  G S Shentall,et al.  The Royal Marsden Hospital pelvic radiotherapy trial: technical aspects and quality assurance. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  W. M. Shehata,et al.  Radiation therapy in prostate cancer: whole pelvis with prostate boost or small field to prostate? , 1992, Urology.

[24]  D. McGowan.  The value of extended field radiation therapy in carcinoma of the prostate. , 1981, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  J. Kearsley,et al.  The relationship between early and late gastrointestinal complications of radiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  M Oldham,et al.  The optimization and inherent limitations of 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans of the prostate. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[27]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Prostate cancer: pelvic nodes revisited--sites, incidence and prospects for treatment with radiotherapy. , 1993, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[28]  M. Oldham,et al.  Comparison of intensity-modulated tomotherapy with stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy for brain tumors. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Decomposition of pencil beam kernels for fast dose calculations in three-dimensional treatment planning. , 1993, Medical physics.

[30]  T. Feyerabend,et al.  Normal Lymph Node Topography: CT Atlas , 2012 .

[31]  M M Kligerman,et al.  A prospective study of treatment techniques to minimize the volume of pelvic small bowel with reduction of acute and late effects associated with pelvic irradiation. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.