Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response.

Tissue engineering in vitro and in vivo involves the interaction of cells with a material surface. The nature of the surface can directly influence cellular response, ultimately affecting the rate and quality of new tissue formation. Initial events at the surface include the orientated adsorption of molecules from the surrounding fluid, creating a conditioned interface to which the cell responds. The gross morphology, as well as the microtopography and chemistry of the surface, determine which molecules can adsorb and how cells will attach and align themselves. The focal attachments made by the cells with their substrate determine cell shape which, when transduced via the cytoskeleton to the nucleus, result in expression of specific phenotypes. Osteoblasts and chondrocytes are sensitive to subtle differences in surface roughness and surface chemistry. Studies comparing chondrocyte response to TiO2 of differing crystallinities show that cells can discriminate between surfaces at this level as well. Cellular response also depends on the local environmental and state of maturation of the responding cells. Optimizing surface structure for site-specific tissue engineering is one option; modifying surfaces with biologicals is another.

[1]  S. Mann,et al.  Ciba Foundation Symposium , 1997 .

[2]  S. Cook,et al.  Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 induces healing in a canine long-bone segmental defect model. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  C. G. Groot,et al.  Better histology and biochemistry for osteoblasts cultured on titanium-doped bioactive glass: bioglass 45S5 compared with iron-, titanium-, fluorine- and boron-containing bioactive glasses. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[4]  R. Klebe,et al.  Comments on the Clinical Application of Fibronectin in Dentistry , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[5]  J. Davidson,et al.  Fibroblasts from wounds of different stages of repair vary in their ability to contract a collagen gel in response to growth factors , 1990, Journal of cellular physiology.

[6]  J. Y. Martin,et al.  Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  M. Solursh,et al.  Chondrogenesis from single limb mesenchyme cells. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[8]  Z. Schwartz,et al.  Uptake and biodistribution of technetium-99m-MD32P during rat tibial bone repair. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  L. Hench,et al.  The Kinetics of Bioactive Ceramics Part III: Surface Reactions for Bioactive Glasses compared with an Inactive Glass , 1991 .

[10]  D. Brunette,et al.  A light and electron microscopic study of the effects of surface topography on the behavior of cells attached to titanium-coated percutaneous implants. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  John E. Davies,et al.  The bone-biomaterial interface , 1991 .

[12]  A. Caplan,et al.  Osteogenesis in Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Cell Porous Ceramic Composites Transplanted Subcutaneously: Effect of Fibronectin and Laminin on Cell Retention and Rate of Osteogenic Expression , 1992, Cell transplantation.

[13]  L. Hench,et al.  Biocompatibility of silicates for medical use. , 2007, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[14]  J. Andrade Interfacial phenomena and biomaterials. , 1973, Medical instrumentation.

[15]  V. Goldberg,et al.  Culture-expanded periosteal-derived cells exhibit osteochondrogenic potential in porous calcium phosphate ceramics in vivo. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  Mark E. Bolander,et al.  Regulation of Fracture Repair by Growth Factors , 1992, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[17]  A I Caplan,et al.  The osteogenic potential of culture-expanded rat marrow mesenchymal cells assayed in vivo in calcium phosphate ceramic blocks. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  C. Stanford,et al.  Bone Cell Expression on Titanium Surfaces is Altered by Sterilization Treatments , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[19]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Interference microscope studies of cell contacts in tissue culture. , 1958, Experimental cell research.

[20]  L. Hench,et al.  Solution effects on the surface reactions of a bioactive glass. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  Barbara Lom,et al.  A versatile technique for patterning biomolecules onto glass coverslips , 1993, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  J. Vasiliev,et al.  Behaviour of fibroblast-like cells on grooved surfaces. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[23]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[24]  B. Boyan,et al.  Matrix vesicle enzyme activity in endosteal bone following implantation of bonding and non-bonding implant materials. , 1991, Clinical Oral Implants Research.

[25]  D. Brunette,et al.  Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  T. Driskell,et al.  Tissue reaction to intrabony ceramic implants. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[27]  D. Brunette,et al.  Effect of cell shape on proteinase secretion by epithelial cells. , 1987, Journal of Cell Science.

[28]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[29]  G. Stein,et al.  Expression of cell growth and bone specific genes at single cell resolution during development of bone tissue‐like organization in primary osteoblast cultures , 1992, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[30]  M. Solursh,et al.  Induction of chondrogenesis in limb mesenchymal cultures by disruption of the actin cytoskeleton , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  V. Vigorita,et al.  The osteogenic response to distant skeletal injury. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  M. Urist,et al.  Bone formation in implants of partially and wholly demineralized bone matrix. Including observations on acetone-fixed intra and extracellular proteins. , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Hydration and preferential molecular adsorption on titanium in vitro. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[34]  P. Ohara,et al.  Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[35]  D. Kohavi,et al.  In vivo regulation of matrix vesicle concentration and enzyme activity during primary bone formation. , 1992, Bone and mineral.

[36]  G. Stein,et al.  Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix , 1990, Journal of cellular physiology.

[37]  M. Solursh Cartilage stem cells: regulation of differentiation. , 1989, Connective tissue research.

[38]  J. Jurist,et al.  35 Quantitation of New Bone Formation in Intramuscular Implants of Bone Matrix in Rabbits , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  L. Holzman,et al.  Regenerating marrow induces systemic increase in osteo- and chondrogenesis. , 1990, Endocrinology.

[40]  S D Cook,et al.  An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. , 1985, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  W. Harris,et al.  Porous-coated uncemented components in experimental total hip arthroplasty in dogs. Effect of plasma-sprayed calcium phosphate coatings on bone ingrowth. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  B. Boyan,et al.  Response of bone and cartilage cells to biomaterials in vivo and in vitro. , 1993, The Journal of oral implantology.

[43]  D. Brunette Fibroblasts on micromachined substrata orient hierarchically to grooves of different dimensions. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[44]  D. Kohavi,et al.  Effects of hydroxyapatite implants on primary mineralization during rat tibial healing: biochemical and morphometric analyses. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[45]  D. I. Hay,et al.  Differential Adsorption and Chemical Affinities of Proteins for Apatitic Surfaces , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[46]  I. Heling,et al.  Calcium-fluorapatite. A new material for bone implants. , 1981, The Journal of oral implantology.

[47]  T. Taylor,et al.  Use of bovine osteogenic protein to promote rapid osseointegration of endosseous dental implants. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[48]  V. Rosen,et al.  Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. , 1988 .

[49]  V. Goldberg,et al.  The influence of a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[50]  D. Brunette Spreading and orientation of epithelial cells on grooved substrata. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[51]  E. Vogler,et al.  Peptide, protein, and cellular interactions with self-assembled monolayer model surfaces. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[52]  D. Brunette,et al.  Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[53]  G. Martin,et al.  Molecular factors determining gingival tissue interaction with tooth structure. , 1982, Journal of periodontal research.

[54]  A F von Recum,et al.  Fibroblast anchorage to microtextured surfaces. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[55]  A. Reddi Cell biology and biochemistry of endochondral bone development. , 1981, Collagen and related research.

[56]  S F Hulbert,et al.  Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[57]  P. Benya,et al.  Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels , 1982, Cell.

[58]  Cook Sd,et al.  The use of a new form of allograft bone in implantation or osseointegrated dental implants--a preliminary report. , 1992 .

[59]  D. Burr,et al.  Histomorphometric assessment of the mechanisms for rapid ingrowth of bone to HA/TCP coated implants. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[60]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. , 1987, Development.

[61]  L L Hench,et al.  Solution effects on the surface reactions of three bioactive glass compositions. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[62]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[63]  J. Mellonig,et al.  The effect of particle size on the osteogenic activity of composite grafts of allogeneic freeze-dried bone and autogenous marrow. , 1980, Journal of periodontology.

[64]  H. Reddi,et al.  Tissue transformation into bone in vivo. A potential practical application. , 1991, JAMA.

[65]  J. Davies,et al.  Behavior of primary bone cells on characterized polystyrene surfaces. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[66]  D. Cochran,et al.  Attachment and Growth of Periodontal Cells on Smooth and Rough Titanium. , 1994, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[67]  W. Norde The Behavior of Proteins at Interfaces, with Special Attention to the Role of the Structure Stability of the Protein Molecule , 1992 .

[68]  J. Heckman,et al.  The use of bone morphogenetic protein in the treatment of non-union in a canine model. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[69]  C. Turner,et al.  Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[70]  R. Tuan,et al.  Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[71]  B D Boyan,et al.  Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[72]  B. Boyan,et al.  Culture surfaces coated with various implant materials affect chondrocyte growth and metabolism , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[73]  K M Yamada,et al.  Cell surface interactions with extracellular materials. , 1983, Annual review of biochemistry.

[74]  J C Keller,et al.  Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.