'Pedometers cost buttons': the feasibility of implementing a pedometer based walking programme within the community

BackgroundRecent studies have suggested that walking interventions may be effective (at least in the short term) at increasing physical activity amongst those people who are the most inactive. This is a leading objective of contemporary public health policy in the UK and worldwide. However, before committing money from limited budgets to implement walking interventions more widely in the community, policymakers will want to know whether similar impacts can be expected and whether any changes will be required to the process to ensure uptake and success. This paper utilises the findings from a recent community-based pedometer study (Walking for Wellbeing in the West - WWW) undertaken in Glasgow, Scotland to address issues of feasibility.MethodsAn economic analysis of the WWW study assessed the costs of the interventions (minimal and maximal) and combined these with the effects to present incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (cost/person achieving the target of an additional 15,000 steps/week). A qualitative evaluation, involving focus group discussions with WWW participants and short interviews with members of the WWW research team, explored perceived benefits and barriers associated with walking, as well as the successful aspects and challenges associated with the interventions.ResultsThe incremental cost effectiveness associated with the interventions was estimated as £92 and £591 per person achieving the target for the minimal and maximal interventions respectively. The qualitative evaluation gave insight into the process by which the results were achieved, and identified several barriers and facilitators that would need to be addressed before implementing the interventions in the wider community, in order to ensure their effective transfer. These included assessing the impact of the relationship between researchers and participants on the results, and the motivational importance of monitoring and assessing performance.ConclusionsThe results suggest that pedometer based walking interventions may be considered cost-effective and suitable for implementation within the wider community. However, several research gaps remain, including the importance and impact of the researcher/participant relationship, the impact of assessment on motivation and effectiveness, and the longer term impact on physical and mental health, resource utilisation and quality of life.Trial registrationCurrent Control Trials Ltd ISRCTN88907382

[1]  Andrew Cole,et al.  Cancer expert doubts claims about prostate cancer trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. , 2005, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[3]  E. B. Zechmeister,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology. , 1990 .

[4]  N. Mutrie,et al.  The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention "Walking for Wellbeing in the West" on physical activity levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[5]  S. Marshall,et al.  Effect of Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Interventions , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[6]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  M. Deaves Walking to health. , 2015, Harvard men's health watch.

[8]  N. Mutrie,et al.  The effect of a 12 week walking intervention on markers of insulin resistance and systemic inflammation. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[9]  B. Marcus,et al.  The transtheoretical model: applications to exercise behavior. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  J. Bowers Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1988 .

[11]  N. Mutrie,et al.  Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  David Ogilvie,et al.  The 'Walking for Wellbeing in the West' randomised controlled trial of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with physical activity consultation with 12 month follow-up: rationale and study design , 2008, BMC public health.

[13]  김만두,et al.  Interviewing , 2018, The Public Relations Writer’s Handbook.

[14]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[15]  L. Gofton,et al.  Developing Focus Group Research. Politics, Theory and Practice. , 2000 .

[16]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[17]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[18]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: A consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  R. Shephard Interventions to promote walking: systematic review , 2008 .