Low dose CT of the heart: a quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging

In 10 years, computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has shifted from an investigational tool to clinical reality. Even though CT technologies are very advanced and widely available, a large body of evidence supporting the clinical role of CTCA is missing. The reason is that the speed of technological development has outpaced the ability of the scientific community to demonstrate the clinical utility of the technique. In addition, with each new CT generation, there is a further broadening of actual and potential applications. In this review we examine the state of the art on CTCA. In particular, we focus on issues concerning technological development, radiation dose, implementation, training and organisation.RiassuntoL’angiografia coronarica con tomografia computerizzata (CTCA) è passata in 10 anni da strumento di ricerca investigativa a strumento clinico di uso routinario. Anche se le tecnologie sono molto diffuse ed avanzate, la maggioranza delle evidenze non supportano ancora in modo forte l’utilizzo di questa metodica. La causa di questo risiede probabilmente nel fatto che la velocità dell’evoluzione tecnologica ha superato ampiamente la capacità del mondo scientifico di sviluppare dati che definiscano meglio il campo di utilizzo. A questo si aggiunge il fatto che ad ogni nuova generazione di apparecchi per la tomografia computerizzata (TC) le reali e potenziali applicazioni si espandono ulteriormente. Abbiamo revisionato lo stato dell’arte corrente sulla CTCA. In particolare, vengono approfonditi gli aspetti inerenti l’evoluzione tecnologica, la dose da radiazioni ionizzanti, l’implementazione, il training e l’organizzazione.

[1]  M. Cova,et al.  64-Slice CT coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography: activity-based cost analysis , 2009, La radiologia medica.

[2]  N Waugh,et al.  Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. , 2008, Health technology assessment.

[3]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  F. Beltrame,et al.  Choice strategy of different dose-saving protocols in 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography , 2009, La radiologia medica.

[5]  Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the task force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the European society of cardiology. , 2006 .

[6]  William W O'Neill,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Ne Pacific Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose , 2008 .

[8]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain: per-segment and per-patient analysis , 2009, European Radiology.

[9]  J. Camm,et al.  Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2006, European heart journal.

[10]  J. Camm,et al.  [Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary]. , 2006, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[11]  O. Matsui,et al.  Effective dose evaluation of multidetector CT examinations: influence of the ICRP recommendation in 2007 , 2009, European Radiology.

[12]  W. Kalender,et al.  Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience , 2009, European Radiology.

[13]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 24-month follow-up study , 2009, European Radiology.

[14]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[15]  V. Treyer,et al.  First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography , 2009, Heart.

[16]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  P. Velasco,et al.  Angiografía coronaria mediante tomografía computarizada multicorte , 2005 .

[19]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[20]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  C. Catalano,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns , 2007, La radiologia medica.

[22]  N. Paul,et al.  Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64 , 2008, European Radiology.

[23]  D. Berman,et al.  From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient—Part III: Executive Summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force Report , 2006 .

[24]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  W. Hoffmann,et al.  EFFECTIVE DOSE ESTIMATION IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY WITH TWO DOSIMETERS: IMPACT OF THE 2007 RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ICRP , 2008, Health physics.

[26]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[27]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease , 2008, European Radiology.

[28]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[29]  L. Shaw,et al.  Differences in episode-based care costs for multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease , 2008, Journal of medical economics.

[30]  L. Feinendegen,et al.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. , 2009, Radiology.

[31]  Dirk Ertel,et al.  Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study , 2009, European Radiology.

[32]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  “In-house” pharmacological management for computed tomography coronary angiography: heart rate reduction, timing and safety of different drugs used during patient preparation , 2009, European Radiology.

[33]  M. Dewey Coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. , 2005, JAMA.

[34]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[35]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography. , 2008, Radiology.

[36]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[37]  D. Berman,et al.  Cost-effective applications of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease , 2008, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[38]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Introduction to coronary imaging with 64-slice computed tomography. , 2005, La Radiologia medica.

[39]  A B Rosenfeld,et al.  A more accurate reconstruction system matrix for quantitative proton computed tomography. , 2009, Medical physics.

[40]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  Imaging for coronary risk assessment: ready for prime time? , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[41]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Prognostic value of 64-slice coronary angiography in diabetes mellitus patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease compared with a nondiabetic population , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[42]  C van Kuijk,et al.  Evaluation of postprocessing dual-energy methods in quantitative computed tomography. Part 1. Theoretical considerations. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[43]  J. Lima,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[44]  Javier Sanz,et al.  Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiography , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[45]  F. Lin,et al.  Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 2008, Radiology.

[46]  L Desbiolles,et al.  Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance , 2008, Heart.

[47]  D. Berman,et al.  Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[48]  R. Khare,et al.  Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[49]  D. Andreini,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[50]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  D. Berman,et al.  Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes. , 2008, American Journal of Cardiology.

[53]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Preserved diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with reduced radiation exposure and cancer risk. , 2009, Radiology.

[54]  I. Seimenis,et al.  Reduction of the estimated radiation dose and associated patient risk with prospective ECG-gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[55]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Informative value of clinical research on multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[56]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography by using different generations of multisection scanners: single-center experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[57]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Feasibility of dual-source cardiac CT angiography with high-pitch scan protocols. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[58]  H. Otero,et al.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[59]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Italian multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the negative predictive value of 16- and 64-slice MDCT imaging in patients scheduled for coronary angiography (NIMISCAD-Non Invasive Multicenter Italian Study for Coronary Artery Disease) , 2009, European Radiology.

[60]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.

[61]  Fabien Hyafil,et al.  Quantification of Inflammation Within Rabbit Atherosclerotic Plaques Using the Macrophage-Specific CT Contrast Agent N1177: A Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Histology , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[63]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Hybrid cardiac imaging: More than the sum of its parts? , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[64]  J. Min,et al.  High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[65]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, European heart journal.

[66]  Filippo Cademartiri European Society of Radiology 2009 Cardiac CT : the missing piece of the puzzle , 2009 .

[67]  V. Romano,et al.  Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT , 2009, European Radiology.

[68]  James C Carr,et al.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Ra , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[69]  Masao Kiguchi,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[70]  K. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. , 2009, JAMA.

[71]  Tianxi Cai,et al.  Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[72]  M. Lauer Elements of danger--the case of medical imaging. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  Filippo Alberghina,et al.  Learning curve for coronary CT angiography: what constitutes sufficient training? , 2009, Radiology.

[74]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[75]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[76]  R. Redberg,et al.  Pay now, benefits may follow--the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[77]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography , 2001, The Lancet.

[78]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease , 2007, European Radiology.

[79]  C van Kuijk,et al.  Evaluation of postprocessing dual-energy methods in quantitative computed tomography. Part 2. Practical aspects. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[80]  D. Bardo,et al.  Low-Dose Coronary Artery Computed Tomography Angiogram of an Infant with Tetralogy of Fallot Using a 256-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography Scanner , 2009, Pediatric Cardiology.

[81]  Richard Wakeford,et al.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. , 2009, Radiology.