Pathology-validated PET image data sets and their role in PET segmentation

Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography has recently been finding broader application for the diagnosis, treatment and therapy assessment of malignant disease. Accurate definition of the tumor border is extremely important for the success of localized tumor therapies. PET promises to provide the metabolically active tumor volume and, at present, it is used for target definition in a variety of tumors. This process is, however, subject to uncertainties of different origin. Resolving these uncertainties is challenging, since validating PET images and segmentation contours against tumor pathology is experimentally difficult. In addition to accurate lesion contouring, this challenges validation of PET tracers and investigations of tumor functional heterogeneity. In this paper, we briefly review the present studies providing PET image data sets with pathology validation. We focus on the specimen handling techniques aimed at achieving higher geometrical accuracy of the pathology-derived “ground truth”. We also summarize the main findings obtained for the PET segmentation techniques which have been tested with the help of these data sets. Finally, we provide a critical summary of the current state of the art in pathological validation of PET images and briefly discuss future possibilities in this direction.

[1]  R. Arceci Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing , 2012 .

[2]  Heiko Schöder,et al.  Deep-inspiration breath-hold PET/CT of the thorax. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  M. Tsao,et al.  PET CT thresholds for radiotherapy target definition in non-small-cell lung cancer: how close are we to the pathologic findings? , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  PET functional volume delineation: a robustness and repeatability study , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Tzei-Yi Lin,et al.  Which FDG/PET parameters of the primary tumors in colon or sigmoid cancer provide the best correlation with the pathological findings? , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Humm,et al.  Feasibility of ex vivo FDG PET of the colon. , 2009, Radiology.

[7]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  A New Method for Volume Segmentation of PET Images, Based on Possibility Theory , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET. , 2010, Medical physics.

[9]  Jinming Yu,et al.  Comparison of (18)F-fluorothymidine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in delineating gross tumor volume by optimal threshold in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of thoracic esophagus. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  L. Boersma,et al.  Analysis of the relative deformation of lung lobes before and after surgery in patients with NSCLC , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Jamal Zweit,et al.  An alternative approach to histopathological validation of PET imaging for radiation therapy image-guidance: a proof of concept. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Developing a methodology for three-dimensional correlation of PET–CT images and whole-mount histopathology in non-small-cell lung cancer , 2008, Current oncology.

[13]  Assen S. Kirov,et al.  Rationale, Instrumental Accuracy, and Challenges of PET Quantification for Tumor Segmentation in Radiation Treatment Planning , 2012 .

[14]  Lei Dong,et al.  Point/Counterpoint. IGRT has limited clinical value due to lack of accurate tumor delineation. , 2013, Medical physics.

[15]  H Zaidi,et al.  Contourlet-based active contour model for PET image segmentation. , 2013, Medical physics.

[16]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Impact of Tumor Size and Tracer Uptake Heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET and CT Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumor Delineation , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Split-dose technique for FDG PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation: a method to facilitate lesion targeting and to provide immediate assessment of treatment effectiveness. , 2013, Radiology.

[18]  J. Lee,et al.  Segmentation of positron emission tomography images: some recommendations for target delineation in radiation oncology. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  D. G. Sakamoto,et al.  The impact of coaxial core biopsy guided by FDG PET/CT in oncological patients , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  Jinming Yu,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation of microscopic tumor extensions using standardized uptake value and metabolic tumor volume in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Design of a benchmark platform for evaluating PET-based contouring accuracy in oncology applications , 2012 .

[23]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Novel multimodality segmentation using level sets and Jensen-Rényi divergence. , 2013, Medical physics.

[24]  Anne Bol,et al.  Evaluation of a multimodality image (CT, MRI and PET) coregistration procedure on phantom and head and neck cancer patients: accuracy, reproducibility and consistency. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  Chen-Shou Chui,et al.  Quality Assurance of IMRT , 2000 .

[26]  Y. Yatabe,et al.  Surgery for NSCLC in the era of personalized medicine , 2013, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[27]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Radiofrequency Ablation of Non-Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Lung Under Real-Time FDG PET CT Guidance , 2011, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[28]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  The use of zeolites to generate PET phantoms for the validation of quantification strategies in oncology. , 2012, Medical physics.

[29]  Anne Bol,et al.  A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  P. Shyn,et al.  Interventional positron emission tomography/computed tomography: state-of-the-art. , 2013, Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology.

[31]  Abbes Amira,et al.  Artificial Neural Network-Based System for PET Volume Segmentation , 2010, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[32]  R. Boellaard Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  Wilson Roa,et al.  A local contrast based approach to threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[34]  Zheng Fu,et al.  Comparison of tumor volumes as determined by pathologic examination and FDG-PET/CT images of non-small-cell lung cancer: a pilot study. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  Liesbeth Boersma,et al.  Microscopic disease extension in three dimensions for non-small-cell lung cancer: development of a prediction model using pathology-validated positron emission tomography and computed tomography features. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  W. Oyen,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[38]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[39]  Tomio Inoue,et al.  Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006-2007. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[40]  C. Rübe,et al.  PET-based delineation of tumour volumes in lung cancer: comparison with pathological findings , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[41]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Comparative methods for PET image segmentation in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[42]  Jinming Yu,et al.  Using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to estimate the length of gross tumor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Incorporating Patient-Specific Variability in the Simulation of Realistic Whole-Body $^{18}{\hbox{F-FDG}}$ Distributions for Oncology Applications , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[44]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  FDG-PET provides the best correlation with the tumor specimen compared to MRI and CT in rectal cancer. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[45]  Yongchun Zhou,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Standardized Uptake Value of Fluorodeoxyglucose for Positron Emission Tomography Imaging to Assess Pathological Volumes of Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Study , 2013, PloS one.

[46]  Jean-François Daisne,et al.  Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. , 2004, Radiology.

[47]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[48]  Frederik Maes,et al.  Biological image-guided radiotherapy in rectal cancer: challenges and pitfalls. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[49]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[50]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  GTV spatial conformity between different delineation methods by 18FDG PET/CT and pathology in esophageal cancer. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[51]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[52]  J. Martí-Climent,et al.  [Validation of segmentation techniques for positron emission tomography using ex-vivo images of oncological surgical specimens]. , 2014 .

[53]  Lale Kostakoglu,et al.  Correlation of positron emission tomography standard uptake value and pathologic specimen size in cancer of the head and neck. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[54]  Liesbeth Boersma,et al.  Feasibility of pathology-correlated lung imaging for accurate target definition of lung tumors. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[55]  Gustavo Mercier,et al.  FDG PET metabolic tumor volume segmentation and pathologic volume of primary human solid tumors. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[56]  S Stute,et al.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[57]  V. Grégoire,et al.  Gradient-based delineation of the primary GTV on FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison with threshold-based approaches, CT and surgical specimens. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[58]  Cornelis A T van den Berg,et al.  Validation of imaging with pathology in laryngeal cancer: accuracy of the registration methodology. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[59]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Biological imaging in radiation therapy: role of positron emission tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[60]  Robert Harrison,et al.  Modeling block detectors in SimSET. , 2008, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  Wim J. G. Oyen,et al.  Pathology-based validation of FDG PET segmentation tools for volume assessment of lymph node metastases from head and neck cancer , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[62]  Chih-Cheng Hsieh,et al.  Effect of formalin fixation on tumor size determination in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.