Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon

Multiactivity – the different ways in which two or more activities can be intertwined and made co-relevant in social interaction – is an inseparable element of everyday life. At the same time it is a little understood form of human conduct. This introductory chapter builds on the basis that multiactivity is a social, verbal and embodied phenomenon, manifest in people’s participation and conduct in interaction, and can be studied empirically by relying on the close analysis of video-recorded data of naturally occurring situations. The chapter connects to previous research on multitasking and outlines how an interactional and social view of the phenomenon can add to our knowledge of how participants engage in, manage and accomplish multiple activities. The chapter outlines new interactional practices and new concepts to describe them.

[1]  Naomi S. Baron.  Adjusting the volume: technology and multitasking in discourse control , 2016 .

[2]  M. Egbert.  Schisming: The Collaborative Transformation From a Single Conversation to Multiple Conversations , 1997 .

[3]  Anna S. Law,et al.  Resistance to the impact of interruptions during multitasking by healthy adults and dysexecutive patients. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Michelle Aebersold,et al.  Interruptions and multitasking in nursing care. , 2010, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[5]  L. Suchman.  Centers of coordination : a case and some themes. , 1997 .

[6]  Charles Goodwin.  Interaction and grammar: Transparent vision , 1996 .

[7]  Mathias Broth,et al.  Seeing through screens, hearing through speakers: Managing distant studio space in television control room interaction , 2009 .

[8]  Mike Levy,et al.  Liminality in multitasking: Where talk and task collide in computer collaborations , 2012, Language in Society.

[9]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Fractured Ecologies: Creating Environments for Collaboration , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Pentti Haddington,et al.  Technologies, Multitasking, and Driving: Attending to and Preparing for a Mobile Phone Conversation in a Car , 2011 .

[11]  J. Sidnell,et al.  The Handbook of Conversation Analysis: Sidnell/The Handbook of Conversation Analysis , 2012 .

[12]  P. Have.  Doing conversation analysis , 2007 .

[13]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[14]  Christian Heath,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground , 1996 .

[15]  E. Laurier.  Doing Office Work on the Motorway , 2004 .

[16]  D. Strayer,et al.  Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Curtis LeBaron,et al.  Closing Up Closings: Showing the Relevance of the Social and Material Surround to the Completion of Interaction , 2002 .

[18]  Sergio Pasquandrea.  Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors' involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions , 2011, Language in Society.

[19]  Pentti Haddington,et al.  Interaction and mobility : language and the body in motion , 2013 .

[20]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Context of Work , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  J. Wajcman,et al.  The Rush Hour: The Character of Leisure Time and Gender Equity , 2000 .

[22]  Jim Schenkein.  Introduction to Sketch of an Analytic Mentality for the Study of Conversational Interaction , 1978 .

[23]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[24]  S J Westerman,et al.  Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology , 2001, Ergonomics.

[25]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Intelligent Use of Space , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[26]  David Francis,et al.  An Invitation to Ethnomethodology: Language, Society and Social Interaction , 2004 .

[27]  Albert Kircher,et al.  Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Saadi Lahlou,et al.  Attracteurs cognitifs et travail de bureau , 2000 .

[29]  C. Heath,et al.  Technology in Action: ‘Interaction’ with computers in architecture , 2000 .

[30]  Marjorie Harness Goodwin.  Prosody in conversation: Informings and announcements in their environment: prosody within a multi-activity work setting , 1996 .

[31]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  “You Are Well Clear of Friendlies”: Diagnostic Error and Cooperative Work in an Iraq War Friendly Fire Incident , 2009, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[32]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions , 2003 .

[33]  Christian Heath,et al.  Collaboration and controlCrisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[34]  Susan B. Kenyon.  Internet Use and Time Use , 2008 .

[35]  C. Kitzinger,et al.  Emotional Labour in Action: Navigating Multiple Involvements in the Beauty Salon , 2007 .