Consequences of two or four months of finishing feeding of culled dry dairy cows on carcass characteristics and technological and sensory meat quality.

Finishing feeding was evaluated as a way to improve carcass-, meat- and eating quality of culled dairy cows. In total, 125 Danish Friesian cows were purchased from commercial dairy herds. Cows were culled for various typical reasons at different stages of lactation, were non-pregnant and had milk yield at culling ranging from 1 to 25kg/d and had LW varying from 330 to 778kg. Cows were housed in tie-stalls and had free access to barley straw and water during a 7-d drying-off period. Cows were allocated to three equal treatment groups based on parity, LW, BCS, and culling reason. A control group (C) was slaughtered immediately after drying-off (n=43), a group (F2) was finishing-fed for 63 days (n=41), and a group (F4) was finishing-fed for 126 days (n=41). In the finishing period, cows had free access to a TMR (10.6 MJ ME and 130g CP per kg of DM). Cows on treatment, F2 and F4 gained 1.16±0.05kg/d in the finishing period. Compared with C-cows, F2- and F4-cows had 56 and 97kg higher carcass weight, 10% and 21% larger Longissimus muscle area, and 14 and 70% more backfat, respectively, at time of slaughter. EUROP conformation scores were 2.2 (C), 3.4 (F2) and 4.4 (F4) and EUROP fat scores were 1.9, 3.0 and 3.7. Finishing feeding increased IMF, improved meat flavour and colour, and tended to reduce shear force value and improve tenderness and juiciness. The F4 cows also had higher fat trim than C- and F2-cows. Cows were divided into two parity groups (1st parity and older cows). Compared with 1st parity cows, older cows ate 12% more feed, had similar daily gain, were heavier, and had higher BCS and fatness including IMF. The results show that it is possible to dry-off and finish-feed culled dairy cows resulting in larger muscles, increased fatness, improved overall carcass quality and better technological as well as sensory quality characteristics.

[1]  P. Barker,et al.  Effect of insulin on hind-limb and whole-body leucine and protein metabolism in fed and fasted lambs , 1987, British Journal of Nutrition.

[2]  G. Macleod,et al.  THE FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS COMPOSITION OF YOUNG AND MATURE CULL HOLSTEIN COWS , 1981 .

[3]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Performance, carcass, and palatability traits for cull cows fed high-energy concentrate diets for 0, 14, 28, 42, or 56 days. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[4]  H. R. Andersen,et al.  Effect of feeding level, grazing and finishing on growth and carcass quality of young Friesian bulls , 1998 .

[5]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Interrelationships Between Marbling, Subcutaneous Fat Thickness and Cooked Beef Palatability , 1982 .

[6]  L. L. Berger,et al.  Effect of testosterone propionate on performance and carcass characteristics of heifers and cows. , 1989, Journal of animal science.

[7]  H. Cross,et al.  Influence of realimentation of mature cows on maturity, color, collagen solubility, and sensory characteristics. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[8]  J. Robelin,et al.  Changes in body composition of mature dry cows of Holstein, limousin and charolais breeds during fattening. I. Skeleton, muscles, fatty tissues and offal , 1990 .

[9]  M. Vestergaard,et al.  Growth, composition and eating quality of Longissimus dorsi from young bulls fed the β-agonist cimaterol at consecutive developmental stages. , 1994, Meat science.

[10]  M. Vestergaard,et al.  Influence of growth rate and muscle type on muscle fibre type characteristics, protein synthesis capacity and activity of the calpain system in Friesian calves , 2002 .

[11]  M. Miller,et al.  Effect of feed energy intake on collagen characteristics and muscle quality of mature cows. , 1987, Meat science.

[12]  L. E. Jeremiah The influence of subcutaneous fat thickness and marbling on beef: Palatability and consumer acceptability , 1996 .

[13]  M. Price,et al.  ON THE CONSEQUENCES AND ECONOMICS OF FEEDING GRAIN AD LIBITUM TO CULLED BEEF COWS , 1981 .

[14]  T. R. Dutson,et al.  Comparison of Forage-Finished and Grain-Finished Beef Carcasses , 1977 .

[15]  L. L. Berger,et al.  Growth and carcass characteristics of cull cows after different times-on-feed. , 1987, Journal of animal science.

[16]  V. H. Oddy,et al.  Hind-limb protein metabolism and calpain system activity influence post-mortem change in meat quality in lamb. , 1999, Meat science.

[17]  J. Oldenbroek,et al.  Factors determining the carcass value of culled dairy cows , 1984 .

[18]  C. Mathis,et al.  Effects of feeding strategy and age on live animal performance, carcass characteristics, and economics of short-term feeding programs for culled beef cows. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[19]  A. Tinsley,et al.  ACCEPTABILITY OF SELECTED MUSCLES FROM POOR CONDITION AND REALIMENTED CULL RANGE COWS , 1979 .

[20]  J. Unruh,et al.  Influence of steroid implants and concentrate feeding on carcass and longissimus muscle sensory and collagen characteristics of cull beef cows. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[21]  R. M. Koch,et al.  Effect of marbling degree on beef palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. , 1994, Journal of animal science.