Handling multivariate problems with univariate control charts

Statistical process control (SPC) is an important ingredient of quality management. SPC has evolved from a technique to a philosophy, and now includes a large number of techniques and methods directed to quality control and quality improvement. Few processes can be controlled through only one parameter. Hence research into multivariate methods applied to SPC has been undertaken already long ago. Hotelling introduced in 1947 the T2 control chart as a technique for monitoring a multivariate process, and several authors have since elaborated on this. In essence the aim to approach the problem of SPC from a multivariate perspective is to make more efficient use of the data by incorporating the covariances in the model. However, multivariate methods have not gained much popularity. This is due to two important drawbacks: interpretation of out‐of‐control situations signalled by a multivariate chart is usually difficult and involves further statistical evaluation of the data; and estimation of the process‐inherent covariance matrix is sensitive to out‐of‐control conditions. This paper illustrates some important control chart methods for multivariate problems. A real‐world case is analysed by several authors in different ways. From this case and many others we conclude that it is often sufficient to use a few univariate control charts, even though the nature of the process is multivariate. The key argument for this conclusion is that direct interpretation on the shop floor is very important. A brief introduction to the implementation of SPC is given in this paper as well. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ronald J. M. M. Does,et al.  Variables control chart limits and tests for special causes , 1992 .

[2]  Ronald D. Snee,et al.  Statistical Thinking and Its Contribution to Total Quality , 1990 .

[3]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 1986 .

[4]  D. Coleman Statistical Process Control—Theory and Practice , 1993 .

[5]  J. E. Jackson A User's Guide to Principal Components , 1991 .

[6]  Lloyd S. Nelson,et al.  Column: Technical Aids: The Shewhart Control Chart--Tests for Special Causes , 1984 .

[7]  A. Erhan Mergen,et al.  IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE T2 CONTROL CHART , 1993 .

[8]  William H. Woodall,et al.  A Comparison of Multivariate Control Charts for Individual Observations , 1996 .

[9]  J. E. Jackson Multivariate quality control , 1985 .

[10]  Lloyd S. Nelson,et al.  Control Charts: Rational Subgroups and Effective Applications , 1988 .

[11]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  Quality Control and Industrial Statistics , 1975 .

[12]  A. R. Crathorne,et al.  Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. , 1933 .

[13]  Leonard A. Seder DIAGNOSIS WITH DIAGRAMS , 1990 .

[14]  G. Barrie Wetherill,et al.  Statistical Process Control , 1991 .

[15]  Emmanuel Yashchin,et al.  Monitoring Variance Components , 1994 .

[16]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Multivariate SPC Methods for Process and Product Monitoring , 1996 .

[17]  D. H. Stamatis,et al.  Failure Mode and Effect Analysis , 1995 .

[18]  Roland Caulcutt,et al.  Control chart design - A review of standard practice , 1992 .

[19]  Rjmm Ronald Does,et al.  A framework for implementation of statistical process control , 1997 .

[20]  P SandorfJ,et al.  The OCAP: Predetermined Responses to Out-of-Control Conditions. , 1993 .

[21]  R. Does,et al.  Shewhart-Type Charts in Nonstandard Situations , 1995 .

[22]  Charles W. Champ,et al.  Assessment of Multivariate Process Control Techniques , 1997 .

[23]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Statistical process control with several components of common cause variability , 1995 .

[24]  Edward G. Schilling A Systematic Approach to the Analysis of Means, Part I. Analysis of Treatment Effects , 1973 .

[25]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  The stalactite plot for the detection of multivariate outliers , 1993 .

[26]  Ronald J. M. M. Does,et al.  Shewhart-Type Control Charts for Individual Observations , 1993 .