Electroencephalographic Activity in a Flanker Interference Task Using Japanese Orthography

The neural activities for color word interference effects were investigated using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) recorded in a flanker-type interference task. Kanji words (Japanese morphograms) and kana words (Japanese phono-grams) were used as the flanker stimuli to obtain insights about hemispheric specialization for processing two types of Japanese orthographies. Interference effects in reaction time were larger when kanji words were presented in the left visual field and when kana words were in the right visual field. ERPs were modulated by the incongruent flankers, which generated a negative ERP component with the different onset and offset depending on flanker attributes. Consistent with the behavioral data, the interference-related negativity was observed for kanji words presented in the left visual field and for kana words in the right visual field. The negativity distributed maximally over the fronto-central site. The early part of the negativity distributed strongly over the frontal midline area, whereas it extended bilaterally over the frontal area in the late phase. The present results support the view of preferential processing of kanji in the right hemisphere and that of kana in the left hemisphere. The temporal profile of scalp topographies for the interference-related neural activity suggests that the medial and dorsolateral prefrontal regions may be involved in maintaining attentional set and conflict resolution.

[1]  F. Dyer.  Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  E. Perret.  The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Sumiko Sasanuma,et al.  Kana and kanji processing in japanese aphasics , 1975, Brain and Language.

[4]  Sumiko Sasanuma,et al.  Tachistoscopic recognition of kana and kanji words , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Differential processing of Kanji and Kana stimuli in Japanese people: Some implications from stroop-test results , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  B. Kopell,et al.  The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. , 1981, Science.

[7]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[12]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus-response compatibility task , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  A Nakagawa.  Visual and semantic processing in reading Kanji. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[19]  E. Zaidel,et al.  The Effects of Procedural Variations on Lateralized Stroop Effects , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  L. Fasotti,et al.  Stroop interference and disorders of selective attention , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[22]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies , 1997, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Lannou,et al.  The Stroop's test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400. , 1997, The International journal of neuroscience.

[24]  Event-related potential response to attended and unattended locations in an interference task , 1998, Biological Psychology.

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[26]  C Alain,et al.  Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[28]  R. Rafal,et al.  Interactions between color and word processing in a flanker task. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  John Polich,et al.  P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  A. Turken,et al.  Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study of the stroop color word interference task. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  New insights into the stroop effect: Spatio-temporal analysis of electric brain activity , 2000, NeuroImage.

[34]  I. Kanazawa,et al.  Different cortical activity in reading of Kanji words, Kana words and Kana nonwords. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  H. Mayberg,et al.  An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[37]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  New insights into the Stroop effect : a spatiotemporal analysis of electric brain activity , 2000 .

[38]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Shingo Yamagata,et al.  Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.