Transferring exploration and production activities within the UK's upstream oil and gas industry: a capabilities perspective

Abstract. Following Richardson (1972), capabilities comprise tacit, personal, subjective and context-specific knowledge that may be shared in practice only with difficulty across small, task oriented groups within firms or other types of organisation, and are expressed in the form of activities. The definition has been influential, and its focus on tacit knowledge has, arguably, encouraged research activities in the form of studies adopting experimental and simulation techniques, while providing less impetus for complementary empirical inquiry. This paper presents an empirical inquiry into an aspect of the development of capabilities in the UK's upstream oil and gas industry promoted by the changing organisation of activities across oil companies and contracting and supply companies. The main argument is that researchers can gain partial and subjective access to capabilities – distinct from activities – because individuals involved in the industry articulate and codify understandings of capabilities through practical theorising and commercial experimenting. Such articulation and codification plays an important role in the development of capabilities in industrial contexts.

[1]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Knowledge, innovative activities and industrial evolution , 2000 .

[2]  D. Yergin The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power , 1990 .

[3]  R. Langlois Capabilities and the Theory of the Firm , 1995 .

[4]  P. D. Newendorp,et al.  Decision analysis for petroleum exploration , 1975 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[7]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Transaction Costs, Markets and Hierarchies , 1994 .

[8]  C. P. Hallwood,et al.  On Choosing Organizational-Arrangements: The Example of Offshore Oil Gathering , 1991 .

[9]  Brian J. Loasby,et al.  The organisation of capabilities , 1998 .

[10]  Karina Aase,et al.  Handbooks as a tool for organizational learning: a case study , 1998 .

[11]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[12]  J. Finch The role of grounded theory in developing economic theory , 2002 .

[13]  R. Koppl Fritz Machlup and Behavioralism , 2000 .

[14]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[15]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[16]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[17]  J. Love Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Theoretical Note , 1995 .

[18]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A dynamic Theory of Business Institutions , 1995 .

[19]  J. Love The Transaction Cost Theory of the (Multinational) Firm - Note , 1997 .

[20]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[21]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[22]  Restructuring Among the World's Leading Oil Companies, 1980–92 , 1996 .

[23]  G. Richardson,et al.  The Organisation of Industry , 1972 .

[24]  J. March The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence , 1999 .

[25]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[26]  C. P. Hallwood Perceptions of Market Efficacy, Transaction Costs, and Vertical Disintegration in Offshore Oil Gathering , 1992 .

[27]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[28]  D. Mcfetridge Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Comment , 1995 .

[29]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms , 2003 .

[30]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  J. Senker Tacit Knowledge and Models of Innovation , 1995 .

[32]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[33]  Paul Hallwood Transaction Costs and Trade Between Multinational Corporations: A Study of Offshore Oil Production , 1991 .

[34]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[35]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Economic Change and the Boundaries of the Firm , 1989 .

[36]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[37]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[38]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Reply , 1995 .

[39]  R. Langlois Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time , 1992 .

[40]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Economic organization, capabilities and co-ordination : essays in honour of G.B.Richardson , 1998 .

[41]  Salvatore Rizzello The economics of the mind , 1999 .

[42]  M. Boisot,et al.  Information Space , 1995 .

[43]  Brian J. Loasby,et al.  The Significance of Penrose's Theory for the Development of Economics , 1999 .

[44]  G. Richardson Imperfect Knowledge And Economic Efficiency , 1953 .

[45]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[46]  J F Hasler A template for change. , 1984, Journal of dental education.

[47]  A. Marshall Principles of Economics , .

[48]  P. Cohendet,et al.  The Economics Of Knowledge: The Debate About Codification And Tacit Knowledge , 2000 .

[49]  N. Foss Knowledge-Based Approaches to the Theory of the Firm: Some Critical Comments , 1996 .