The excitation of plasma convection in the high‐latitude ionosphere

Recent observations of ionospheric flows by ground-based radars, in particular by the European Incoherent Scatter (EISCAT) facility using the “Polar” experiment, together with previous analyses of the response of geomagnetic disturbance to variations of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), suggest that convection in the high-latitude ionosphere should be considered to be the sum of two intrinsically time-dependent patterns, one driven by solar wind-magnetosphere coupling at the dayside magnetopause, the other by the release of energy in the geomagnetic tail (mainly by dayside and nightside reconnection, respectively). The flows driven by dayside coupling are largest on the dayside, where they usually dominate, are associated with an expanding polar cap area, and are excited and decay on ∼10-min time scales following southward and northward turnings of the IMF, respectively. The latter finding indicates that the production of new open flux at the dayside magnetopause excites magnetospheric and ionospheric flow only for a short interval, ∼10 min, such that the flow driven by this source subsequently decays on this time scale unless maintained by the production of more open flux tubes. Correspondingly, the flows excited by the release of energy in the tail, mainly during substorms, are largest on the nightside, are associated with a contracting polar cap boundary, and are excited on ∼1-hour time scales following a southward turn of the IMF. In general, the total ionospheric flow will be the sum of the flows produced by these two sources, such that due to their different response times to changes in the IMF, considerable variations in the flow pattern can occur for a given direction and strength of the IMF. Consequently, the ionospheric electric field cannot generally be regarded as arising from a simple mapping of the solar wind electric field along open flux tubes.

[1]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Low-energy ion outflows from the ionosphere during a major polar cap expansion - Evidence for equatorward motion of inverted-V structures , 1986 .

[2]  R. Heelis,et al.  Ionospheric convection signatures and magnetic field topology , 1987 .

[3]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Solar wind control of auroral zone geomagnetic activity , 1981 .

[4]  W. Hughes,et al.  Observation of an IMF sector effect in the Y magnetic field component at geostationary orbit , 1983 .

[5]  C. Russell,et al.  The magnetotail and substorms , 1973 .

[6]  Kenneth H. Schatten,et al.  Response of the geomagnetic activity index Kp to the interplanetary magnetic field , 1967 .

[7]  T. Hill,et al.  Mapping of the solar wind electric field to the Earth's polar caps , 1989 .

[8]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Flux transfer events on the magnetopause: Spatial distribution and controlling factors , 1984 .

[9]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Response time of the high-latitude dayside ionosphere to sudden changes in the north-south component of the IMF , 1988 .

[10]  M. Saunders.  Origin of the cusp Birkeland currents , 1989 .

[11]  P. Reiff.  Sunward convection in both polar caps , 1982 .

[12]  M. Lockwood,et al.  OBSERVATIONS AT THE MAGNETOPAUSE AND IN THE AURORAL IONOSPHERE OF MOMENTUM TRANSFER FROM THE SOLAR WIND , 1988 .

[13]  C. Clauer,et al.  High‐latitude dayside electric fields and currents during strong northward interplanetary magnetic field: Observations and model simulation , 1988 .

[14]  N. Maynard,et al.  Empirical high‐latitude electric field models , 1987 .

[15]  M. Freeman,et al.  The effect of magnetospheric erosion on mid- and high-latitude ionospheric flows , 1988 .

[16]  Per Even Sandholt,et al.  IMF control of polar cusp and cleft auroras , 1988 .

[17]  R. P. Lepping,et al.  Response of the auroral oval precipitation and magnetospheric convection to changes in the interplanetary magnetic field , 1987 .

[18]  Stanley W. H. Cowley,et al.  The impact of recent observations on theoretical understanding of solar wind-magnetosphere interactions. , 1986 .

[19]  Stanley W. H. Cowley,et al.  Initial EISCAT observations of plasma convection at invariant latitudes 70°–77° , 1984 .

[20]  R. P. Lepping,et al.  Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: Combined incoherent-scatter radar and magnetometer measurements for January 18-19, 1984 , 1988 .

[21]  D. Southwood.  Magnetopause coupling processes and ionospheric responses: a theoretical perspective , 1989, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  T. Eastman,et al.  Energetic Particle Observations in the Low‐Latitude Boundary Layer , 1985 .

[23]  W. Hughes,et al.  Theory of hydromagnetic waves in the magnetosphere , 1983 .

[24]  F. Mozer.  Electric field evidence on the viscous interaction at the magnetopause , 1984 .

[25]  A. Nishida.  Geomagnetic Dp 2 fluctuations and associated magnetospheric phenomena , 1968 .

[26]  R. Heelis.  Interplanetary Magnetic Field Effects on High Latitude Ionospheric Convection , 1985 .

[27]  M. Freeman,et al.  Recent ionospheric observations relating to solar-wind-magnetosphere coupling , 1989, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  G. Siscoe,et al.  Polar cap inflation and deflation , 1985 .

[29]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Eastward propagation of a plasma convection enhancement following a southward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field , 1986 .

[30]  Stanley W. H. Cowley,et al.  Magnetospheric asymmetries associated with the y-component of the IMF , 1981 .

[31]  W. J. Burke,et al.  S3‐2 measurements of the polar cap potential , 1983 .

[32]  H. Rosenbauer,et al.  Heos 2 plasma observations in the distant polar magnetosphere: The plasma mantle , 1975 .

[33]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic field control of high-latitude electric fields and currents determined from Greenland Magnetometer Data , 1985 .

[34]  M. Freeman,et al.  The response of dayside ionospheric convection to the Y-component of the magnetosheath magnetic field: A case study , 1990 .

[35]  R. Manka,et al.  Dynamics of the 1054 UT March 22, 1979, substorm event: CDAW 6 , 1985 .

[36]  H. Rishbeth,et al.  Ionospheric response to changes in the interplanetary magnetic field observed by EISCAT and AMPTE–UKS , 1985, Nature.

[37]  D. Stern.  A study of the electric field in an open magnetospheric model , 1973 .

[38]  S. Cowley,et al.  Substorm processes in the geomagnetic tail and their effect in the nightside auroral zone ionosphere as observed by eiscat , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences.

[39]  M. Lockwood,et al.  The effect of rapid changes in ionospheric flow on velocity vectors deduced from radar beam-swinging experiments , 1989 .

[40]  T. Hill,et al.  Solar wind plasma injection at the dayside magnetospheric cusp , 1977 .

[41]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  An extended study of the low‐latitude boundary layer on the dawn and dusk flanks of the magnetosphere , 1987 .

[42]  P. Reiff,et al.  IMF By-dependent plasma flow and Birkeland currents in the dayside magnetosphere: 2. A global model for northward and southward IMF , 1985 .

[43]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Magnetospheric processes preceding the onset of an isolated substorm: A Case study of the March 31, 1978, substorm , 1983 .

[44]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Ion flows and heating at a contracting polar-cap boundary , 1988 .

[45]  G. Siscoe,et al.  IMF By and day‐night conductivity effects in the expanding polar cap convection model , 1987 .

[46]  A. Nishida.  Coherence of geomagnetic DP 2 fluctuations with interplanetary magnetic variations , 1968 .

[47]  E. W. Hones,et al.  A high time resolution study of interplanetary parameter correlations with AE , 1981 .

[48]  R. L. Arnoldy,et al.  SIGNATURE IN THE INTERPLANETARY MEDIUM FOR SUBSTORMS. , 1971 .

[49]  S. Cowley.  Solar wind control of magnetospheric convection , 1984 .

[50]  M. Lockwood,et al.  A survey of simultaneous observations of the high-latitude ionosphere and interplanetary magnetic field with EISCAT and AMPTE-UKS , 1986 .

[51]  J. Winningham,et al.  Penetration of magnetosheath plasma to low altitudes through the dayside magnetospheric cusps , 1971 .

[52]  L. Lyons.  A simple model for polar cap convection patterns and generation of θ auroras , 1985 .

[53]  R. L. McPherron,et al.  A quantitative empirical model of the magnetospheric flux transfer process , 1986 .

[54]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  A survey of dayside flux transfer events observed by ISEE 1 and 2 magnetometers , 1984 .

[55]  J. Luhmann,et al.  Solar Wind Control of the Polar CAP Voltage , 1986 .

[56]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  Event study on pre-substorm phases and their relation to the energy coupling between solar wind and magnetosphere , 1981 .

[57]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  Midday auroral breakup events and related energy and momentum transfer from the magnetosheath , 1990 .

[58]  R. Heelis.  The effects of interplanetary magnetic field orientation on dayside high‐latitude ionospheric convection , 1984 .

[59]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Comparison of field-aligned currents at ionospheric and magnetospheric altitudes , 1988 .

[60]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  Dayside auroral activity and magnetic flux transfer from the solar wind , 1989 .

[61]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  The magnetopause for large magnetic shear: AMPTE/IRM observations , 1986 .

[62]  E. W. Hones,et al.  An ISEE 3 high time resolution study of interplanetary parameter correlations with magnetospheric activity , 1983 .

[63]  R. Heelis,et al.  Polar cap deflation during magnetospheric substorms , 1989 .

[64]  R. Heelis,et al.  Multistation measurements of high‐latitude ionospheric convection , 1983 .

[65]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Comparison of polar cap potential drops estimated from solar wind and ground magnetometer data: CDAW 6 , 1985 .

[66]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  The Configuration of the Magnetosphere , 1972 .

[67]  Eigil Friis-Christensen,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic-field direction and high-latitude ionospheric currents , 1972 .

[68]  T. Sanderson,et al.  ISEE 3 observations during the CDAW 8 intervals: Case studies of the distant geomagnetic tail covering a wide range of geomagnetic activity , 1989 .

[69]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Polar cap electric field structures with a northward interplanetary magnetic field , 1979 .

[70]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Dependence of polar cap potential drop on interplanetary parameters , 1981 .

[71]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Flow in the high latitude ionosphere: measurements at 15s resolution made using the EISCAT ‘Polar’ experiment , 1988 .

[72]  David J. Southwood,et al.  The ionospheric signature of flux transfer events , 1987 .

[73]  F. Mozer,et al.  Comparison of S3-3 polar cap potential drops with the interplanetary magnetic field and models of magnetopause reconnection , 1983 .

[74]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic field control of dayside auroral activity and the transfer of momentum across the dayside magnetopause , 1989 .

[75]  R. Boyd.  Geophysics. The Earth's Environment Edited by C. DeWitt, J. Hieblot, A. Lebeau (Published by Gordon and Breach, New York: Paper $8.50; cloth $10.50. pp. xiv + 624) , 1963 .

[76]  S. Cowley.  The causes of convection in the Earth's magnetosphere: A review of developments during the IMS , 1982 .

[77]  J. V. Evans,et al.  Empirical models for the plasma convection at high latitudes from Millstone Hill observations , 1987 .

[78]  M. Lockwood,et al.  The dependence of high-latitude dayside ionospheric flows on the North-South component of the IMF: a high time resolution correlation analysis using EISCAT polar and AMPTE UKS and IRM data , 1988 .

[79]  C. Clauer,et al.  DP 1 and DP 2 current systems for the March 22, 1979 substorms , 1985 .

[80]  E. W. Hones.  Transient phenomena in the magnetotail and their relation to substorms , 1979 .