Evidence for biotic controls on topography and soil production

article soils hillslopes biology trees radar The complex interplay of biological, physical, and chemical processes in pedogenesis and hillslope evolution limits our ability to predict and interpret landscape dynamics. Here, we synthesize a suite of observations from the steep, forested Oregon Coast Range to analyze the role of trees in topographic modification and bedrock-to-soil conversion. Using topographic data derived from airborne lidar, we demonstrate that the topographic signature of forest-driven soil and bedrock disturbance is pervasive. For length scales greater than 7.5 m, the land surface is defined by ridge-valley landforms, whereas smaller scales are dominated by pit-mound features generated by the turnover of large coniferous trees. From field surveys, the volume of bedrock incorporated in overturned rootwads increases rapidly with diameter for large conifers, reflecting the highly nonlinear increase in root biomass with tree diameter. Because trees younger than 60 years detach negligible bedrock, short timber harvest intervals may limit the extent to which root systems penetrate bedrock and facilitate bedrock fracturing and biogeochemical weathering. Using ground- penetrating radar, we show that the rootwads of large trees root achieve substantial penetration (1- 3m ) into shallow bedrock. The radar transects also reveal that variations in soil thickness have characteristic length scales of 1 to 5 m, consistent with the scale of large rootwads, indicating that both the landscape surface and soil-bedrock interface exhibit a biogenic imprint. In our study area, the residence time of bedrock within dense rooting zones directly below large trees is similar to the time required for trees to occupy the entire forest floor through multiple cycles of forest succession, suggesting that biological modification of shallow bedrock is ubiquitous. Given increases in erosion rate, the ability of roots to initiate soil production may decline as bedrock exhumation through the biotic zone is rapid relative to the time required for successive forests and their associated root systems to fracture bedrock. As a result, in rapidly eroding terrain the coupling between biotic and abiotic weathering processes (such as exfoliation fracturing) may dictate the maximum rate of bedrock-to-soil conversion.

[1]  John C. Tappeiner,et al.  Tree species and size structure of old-growth Douglas-fir forests in central western Oregon, USA , 2005 .

[2]  O. Sass,et al.  Application of field geophysics in geomorphology: Advances and limitations exemplified by case studies , 2008 .

[3]  William W. Doe,et al.  Landscape erosion and evolution modeling , 2001 .

[4]  M. Caffee,et al.  Using Cosmogenic Nuclide Measurements In Sediments To Understand Background Rates Of Erosion And Sediment Transport , 2001 .

[5]  W. Dietrich,et al.  The search for a topographic signature of life , 2006, Nature.

[6]  J. Steiger,et al.  Vegetation as a major conductor of geomorphic changes on the Earth surface: toward evolutionary geomorphology , 2009 .

[7]  J. Roering,et al.  How well can hillslope evolution models “explain” topography? Simulating soil transport and production with high-resolution topographic data , 2008 .

[8]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  EROSION RATES IN THE SOUTHERN OREGON COAST RANGE: EVIDENCE FOR AN EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN HILLSLOPE EROSION AND SEDIMENT YIELD , 1991 .

[9]  H. Lutz,et al.  The influence of tree roots on soil morphology , 1939 .

[10]  S. Eis,et al.  Root System Morphology of Western Hemlock, Western Red Cedar, and Douglas-fir , 1974 .

[11]  S. A. Hagrey.  Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity , 2007 .

[12]  A. Neal.  Ground-penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress , 2004 .

[13]  辻村 太郎.  Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth , 1961 .

[14]  S. Mudd,et al.  Bedrock erosion by root fracture and tree throw: A coupled biogeomorphic model to explore the humped soil production function and the persistence of hillslope soils , 2010 .

[15]  C. T. Dyrness,et al.  Natural history of Oregon coast mammals , 1981 .

[16]  R. Schaetzl,et al.  Longevity of treethrow microtopography: implications for mass wasting , 1990 .

[17]  M. Collins,et al.  Use of soil information to determine application of ground penetrating radar , 1995 .

[18]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Linkages Between Weathering and Erosion in a Small, Steep Catchment , 2002 .

[19]  P. Hesse,et al.  Soil production in heath and forest, Blue Mountains, Australia: influence of lithology and palaeoclimate , 2005 .

[20]  R. Amundson,et al.  Coupling between biota and earth materials in the critical zone , 2007 .

[21]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Physical and Chemical Controls on the Critical Zone , 2007 .

[22]  R. Yeats,et al.  Tectonics of the Neogene Cascadia forearc basin: Investigations of a deformed late Miocene unconformity , 2000 .

[23]  R. G. McMinn,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF DOUGLAS-FIR ROOT SYSTEMS , 1963 .

[24]  P. Bartlein,et al.  A 9000-year fire history from the Oregon Coast Range, based on a high-resolution charcoal study , 1998 .

[25]  J. Tappeiner,et al.  Density, ages, and growth rates in old-growth and young-growth forests in coastal Oregon , 1997 .

[26]  L. C. Kuiper,et al.  The structure of natural Douglas-fir forests in Western Washington and Western Oregon. , 1988 .

[27]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Exploring pedogenesis via nuclide-based soil production rates and OSL-based bioturbation rates , 2005 .

[28]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Biological energy in landscape evolution , 2009, American Journal of Science.

[29]  J. Phillips,et al.  Biomechanical Effects of Trees on Soil and Regolith: Beyond Treethrow , 2006 .

[30]  R. Anderson,et al.  Estimates of the rate of regolith production using and from an alpine hillslope , 1999 .

[31]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[32]  R. Fogel,et al.  Root turnover and productivity of coniferous forests , 1983, Plant and Soil.

[33]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Evidence for nonlinear, diffusive sediment transport on hillslopes and implications for landscape morphology , 1999 .

[34]  O. Reichman,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF BIOTURBATION ON SOIL PROCESSES AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT , 2003 .

[35]  R. Waring,et al.  Evergreen Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1979, Science.

[36]  P. Heller,et al.  Submarine ramp facies model for delta-fed, sand-rich turbidite systems , 1985 .

[37]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Stochastic processes of soil production and transport: erosion rates, topographic variation and cosmogenic nuclides in the Oregon Coast Range , 2001 .

[38]  J. Phillips,et al.  Pedologic and geomorphic impacts of a tornado blowdown event in a mixed pine-hardwood forest , 2008 .

[39]  David D. Pollard,et al.  Fundamentals of Structural Geology , 2005 .

[40]  Gregory E. Tucker,et al.  Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology , 1998 .

[41]  R. Beschta.  Long-Term Patterns of Sediment Production Following Road Construction and Logging in the Oregon Coast Range , 1978 .

[42]  M. Gerber.  GEOMORPHIC RESPONSE TO WILDFIRE IN THE OREGON COAST RANGE , 2004 .

[43]  Torsten Schaub,et al.  The variability of root cohesion as an influence on shallow landslide susceptibility in the Oregon Coast Range , 2001 .

[44]  D. Sparks,et al.  Soil Biogeochemical Processes within the Critical Zone , 2007 .

[45]  J. Franklin,et al.  Initiation of an old-growth Douglas-fir stand in the Pacific Northwest: a reconstruction from tree-ring records , 2002 .

[46]  W. Dietrich,et al.  The soil production function and landscape equilibrium , 1997, Nature.

[47]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Process-based model linking pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) activity to sediment transport and soil thickness , 2005 .

[48]  D. Montgomery.  Slope Distributions, Threshold Hillslopes, and Steady-state Topography , 2001 .

[49]  R. K. Hermann,et al.  Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems , 1977, Pedobiologia.

[50]  R. Graham,et al.  Rock to regolith conversion: Producing hospitable substrates for terrestrial ecosystems , 2010 .

[51]  P. Cunningham,et al.  Estimating large-root biomass from stump and breast-height diameters for Douglas-fir in western Oregon , 1996 .

[52]  D. Richter,et al.  Monitoring Earth's Critical Zone , 2009, Science.

[53]  Efi Foufoula-Georgiou,et al.  Channel network extraction from high resolution topography using wavelets , 2007 .

[54]  A. Heimsath,et al.  Coupling chemical weathering with soil production across soil‐mantled landscapes , 2007 .

[55]  G. Hancock,et al.  The ‘humped’ soil production function: eroding Arnhem Land, Australia , 2009 .

[56]  R. Schaetzl,et al.  TREE UPROOTING: REVIEW OF TYPES AND PATTERNS OF SOIL DISTURBANCE , 1990 .

[57]  S. F. Personius,et al.  Late Quaternary stream incision and uplift in the forearc of the Cascadia subduction zone , 1995 .

[58]  R. Amundson,et al.  The critical role of climate and saprolite weathering in landscape evolution , 2009 .

[59]  Alexia Stokes,et al.  A Numerical Investigation into the Influence of Soil Type and Root Architecture on Tree Anchorage , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[60]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  Scaling in Biology , 2000 .

[61]  P. Martin.  Movements and Activities of the Mountain Beaver (Aplodontia rufa) , 1971 .

[62]  B. Cardinale,et al.  Dynamic interactions of life and its landscape: feedbacks at the interface of geomorphology and ecology , 2010 .

[63]  J. Bockheim,et al.  Quaternary upper plate deformation in coastal Oregon , 1996 .

[64]  James A. Doolittle,et al.  Utility of ground-penetrating radar as a root biomass survey tool in forest systems , 2003 .

[65]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Sediment budget for a small catchment in mountainous terrain , 1978 .

[66]  D. Montgomery.  Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.