Roles of ACL remnants in knee stability

PurposeThis study evaluated knee laxity in anterior tibial translation and rotation following removal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants using a computer navigation system.MethodsThis prospective study included 50 knees undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a navigation system. ACL remnants were classified into four morphologic types: Type 1, bridging between the roof of the intercondylar notch and tibia; Type 2, bridging between the posterior cruciate ligament and tibia; Type 3, bridging between the anatomical insertions of the ACL on the lateral wall of the femoral condyle and the tibia; and Type 4, no bridging of ACL remnants. Anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity were measured before and after remnant resection using a navigation system at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. The amount of change in anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity of each type was compared among the types.ResultsThe different morphologic types of ACL remnants were as follows: Type 1, 15 knees; Type 2, 9 knees; Type 3, 6 knees; and Type 4, 20 knees. The amount of change in anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity at 30° knee flexion in Type 3 was significantly larger than in the other types. There were no significant differences in either tibial translation or rotatory laxity at 60° and 90° knee flexion among the types.ConclusionsIn Type 3, ACL remnants contributed to anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity evaluated at 30° knee flexion. The bridging point of the remnants is important to knee laxity. The Type 3 remnant should be preserved as much as possible when ACL reconstruction surgery is performed.Level of evidencePrognostic study, Level II.

[1]  Y. Ishibashi,et al.  Validation of computer-assisted double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2007, Orthopedics.

[2]  Masataka Deie,et al.  Biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament remnants: how long do they contribute to knee stability after injury in patients with complete tears? , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  安達 伸生 Contribution of mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament to the joint position sense of the knee , 2002 .

[4]  James R. Robinson,et al.  Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles on Knee Kinematics , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  Stefano Zaffagnini,et al.  Pivot‐shift test: Analysis and quantification of knee laxity parameters using a navigation system , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Assessment and augmentation of symptomatic anteromedial or posterolateral bundle tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  R. Bray,et al.  Vascular physiology and long‐term healing of partial ligament tears , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  A. De Carli,et al.  Double bundle or single bundle plus extraarticular tenodesis in ACL reconstruction? , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  Yuji Yamamoto,et al.  Intraoperative navigation evaluation of tibial translation after resection of anterior cruciate ligament remnants. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  K. Kawasaki,et al.  Induction of somatosensory evoked potentials by mechanical stimulation in reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  N. Adachi,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation under arthroscopy. A minimum 2-year follow-up in 40 patients. , 2000, Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery.

[12]  I. Sekiya,et al.  Remnant volume of anterior cruciate ligament correlates preoperative patients’ status and postoperative outcome , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[13]  Satoshi Toh,et al.  Intraoperative evaluation of the anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the OrthoPilot navigation system. , 2005, Orthopedics.

[14]  Radek Hart,et al.  Outcomes after conventional versus computer-navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  James R. Robinson,et al.  Using Navigation to Measure Rotation Kinematics during ACL Reconstruction , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D. Fithian,et al.  Variation in anterior cruciate ligament scar pattern: does the scar pattern affect anterior laxity in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees? , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[17]  E S Grood,et al.  Arthroscopy in acute traumatic hemarthrosis of the knee. Incidence of anterior cruciate tears and other injuries. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  N. Adachi,et al.  Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[19]  Rainer Siebold,et al.  Why perform an ACL augmentation? , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[20]  R. Ostermann,et al.  Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  W. Breidahl,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous double hamstrings: a comparison of standard versus minimal debridement techniques using MRI to assess revascularisation. A randomised prospective study with a one-year follow-up. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[23]  S. Lee,et al.  Comparison of anterior and rotatory laxity using navigation between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction: prospective randomized trial , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[24]  A. Georgoulis,et al.  The presence of proprioceptive mechanoreceptors in the remnants of the ruptured ACL as a possible source of re-innervation of the ACL autograft. , 2001, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.