In orthodontics, the malalignment of teeth could be measured using many types of indexes. The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index is one of the most common indexes in Orthodontics which has a 98% validity, especially from the occlusal surface. Many researchers use a PAR ruler to measure the PAR Index manually. The aim of this study is to compare the duration between the manual and digital measurement of PAR index in a system based on the 2-dimensional (2D) image. Materials & methods: The 110 dental casts in octagonal base form pre-orthodontic treatment were scanned to get the digital image data. Eleven components of PAR index of 110 dental casts in octagonal base form pre-orthodontic treatment were calculated manually and digitally. Both of duration were compared with the paired t-test. Result: The time consuming of manual measurement was 378.01 seconds and digital was 177.05 seconds. The paired t-test comparing to systems were significant (p=0.001). The average difference of 3 PAR index scores in assessing the same study model, that shows Digital is more thorough at 3 PAR parity score. Discussion: The paired T-test has been performed to the 11 PAR index component. A digital measurement of 11 PAR component is reliable and faster than using a measurement manually by model studies. The 2D image is clearer so that point determination is easier hence the measurement time is faster. Conclusions: It is a solution and recommended for the orthodontist to consider of using PARIndex system as one of the alternative tools to have a faster PAR index measurement. Clinical article (J Int Dent Med Res 2017; 10(Special Issue): pp. 673-676)
[1]
Benny Hardjono,et al.
THE PAR (PEER ASSESSMENT RATING) CALCULATION ON 2 DIMENSIONAL TEETH MODEL IMAGE FOR THE CENTERLINE COMPONENT AND TEETH SEGMENTATION ON THE OCCLUSAL SURFACE TEETH MODEL IMAGE
,
2014
.
[2]
R. Cibrián,et al.
A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method.
,
2013,
European journal of orthodontics.
[3]
C D Stephens,et al.
The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity.
,
1992,
European journal of orthodontics.
[4]
Katherine W L Vig,et al.
Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
,
2005,
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[5]
Rafael C. González,et al.
Digital image processing using MATLAB
,
2006
.
[6]
S. Isa,et al.
PEER ASSESSMENT RATING (PAR) INDEX CALCULATION ON 2D DENTAL MODEL IMAGE FOR OVER JET, OPEN BITE, AND TEETH SEGMENTATION ON OCCLUSION SURFACE
,
2014
.