Group Preference and Convergent Tendencies in Small Groups: A Content Analysis of Group Brainstorming Performance

This study examined the impact of preference for working in groups on interaction during a brainstorming session. Groups of 4 people were composed based on their individual group preference scores (i.e., high or low preference for working in groups). These groups worked as 4 independent individuals (nominal participants) or as an interactive group of 4. It was hypothesized that convergent tendencies promoted in interactive settings would hinder group brainstorming performance and that high group preference would enhance these convergent tendencies. These predictions were generally supported by the findings.

[1]  E. Salas,et al.  Personality and group performance. , 1987 .

[2]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Accuracy and confidence in group judgment , 1989 .

[3]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social influence processes in group brainstorming. , 1993 .

[4]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. , 1993 .

[5]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[6]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[7]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Perception of Performance in Group Brainstorming: The Illusion of Group Productivity , 1993 .

[8]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  A comparison of individual, subgroup, and total group methods of problem solving. , 1974 .

[9]  J. Geoffrey Rawlinson,et al.  Creative thinking and brainstorming , 1981 .

[10]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[11]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[12]  G. Clore,et al.  A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. , 1970 .

[13]  N. Kerr,et al.  Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects , 1983 .

[14]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[15]  Michael Diehl,et al.  The Illusion of Group Effectivity , 1992 .

[16]  R. Mann.  A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. , 1959 .

[17]  Kathleen Mosier,et al.  When Convergent Thought Improves Performance: Majority Versus Minority Influence , 1992 .

[18]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[19]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  Personality, problem-solving procedure, and performance in small groups. , 1969 .

[20]  J. H. Davis.  Individual-group problem solving, subject preference, and problem type. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[22]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  P. Paulus,et al.  Performance and Perceptions of Brainstormers in an Organizational Setting , 1995 .

[24]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  The Interaction Anxiousness Scale: construct and criterion-related validity. , 1993, Journal of personality assessment.

[25]  C. Nemeth.  Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[26]  P. Paulus,et al.  The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming , 1995 .