The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope on sensitivity to interaural time delays.

The auditory system is sensitive to interaural timing disparities in the fine structure and the envelope of sounds, each contributing important cues for lateralization. In this study, psychophysical measurements were conducted with customized envelope waveforms in order to investigate the isolated effect of different segments of a periodic, ongoing envelope on lateralization. One envelope cycle was composed of the four segments attack flank, hold duration, decay flank, and pause duration, which were independently varied to customize the envelope waveform. The envelope waveforms were applied to a 4-kHz sinusoidal carrier, and just noticeable envelope interaural time differences were measured in six normal hearing subjects. The results indicate that attack durations and pause durations prior to the attack are the most important stimulus characteristics for processing envelope timing disparities. The results were compared to predictions of three binaural lateralization models based on the normalized cross correlation coefficient. Two of the models included an additional stage to mimic neural adaptation prior to binaural interaction, involving either a single short time constant (5 ms) or a combination of five time constants up to 500 ms. It was shown that the model with the single short time constant accounted best for the data.

[1]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J. Culling,et al.  Measurements of the binaural temporal window using a detection task , 1998 .

[3]  P. Heil Representation of Sound Onsets in the Auditory System , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Operating range and maximum response of single auditory nerve fibers , 1980, Brain Research.

[5]  T Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  T. Dau,et al.  Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  B. Moore,et al.  A revision of Zwicker's loudness model , 1996 .

[9]  Richard M. Stern,et al.  Lateralization and detection of low‐frequency binaural stimuli: Effects of distribution of internal delay , 1996 .

[10]  T. Yin,et al.  Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R L Smith,et al.  Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L. L. Young,et al.  Time-intensity trading functions for pure tones and a high-frequency AM signal. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  M A Akeroyd,et al.  A comparison of detection and discrimination of temporal asymmetry in amplitude modulation. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W. Lindemann Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Wickesberg,et al.  Delayed, frequency-specific inhibition in the cochlear nuclei of mice: a mechanism for monaural echo suppression , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Accounting quantitatively for sensitivity to envelope-based interaural temporal disparities at high frequencies. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S van de Par,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R. Meddis Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A computer model of the auditory-nerve response to forward-masking stimuli. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Dennis McFadden,et al.  Lateralization at high frequencies , 1975 .

[24]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A revised model of the inner-hair cell and auditory-nerve complex. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  T. F. Weiss,et al.  A comparison of synchronization filters in different auditory receptor organs , 1988, Hearing Research.

[27]  Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  T. Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. II. Simulations and measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Arthur B. Baggeroer,et al.  The Heard Island papers: A contribution to global acoustics , 1994 .

[30]  N. Durlach Equalization and Cancellation Theory of Binaural Masking‐Level Differences , 1963 .

[31]  Ervin R. Hafter,et al.  Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects , 1981 .

[32]  Constantine Trahiotis,et al.  How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R. Meddis,et al.  Implementation details of a computation model of the inner hair‐cell auditory‐nerve synapse , 1990 .

[35]  J. Nuetzel,et al.  Lateralization of complex waveforms: effects of fine structure, amplitude, and duration. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Effects of level and background noise on interaural time difference discrimination for transposed stimuli. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  E. C. Cherry,et al.  Mechanism of Binaural Fusion in the Hearing of Speech , 1957 .

[38]  T N Buell,et al.  Restarting the adapted binaural system. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  M A Akeroyd,et al.  A binaural analog of gap detection. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  G. Henning Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  D W Grantham,et al.  Interaural intensity discrimination: insensitivity at 1000 Hz. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  H. Steven Colburn Erratum: ''Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise'' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 525-533 (1977)] , 1977 .

[44]  Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities conveyed by high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones and high-frequency transposed tones: effects of spectrally flanking noises. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Binaural processing of modulated interaural level differences. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  XII. On our perception of sound direction , 1907 .

[47]  Peter Heil,et al.  A physiological model for the stimulus dependence of first-spike latency of auditory-nerve fibers , 2008, Brain Research.

[48]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  The Role of Envelope Waveform, Adaptation, and Attacks in Binaural Perception , 2010 .

[49]  T. Yin,et al.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  S van de Par,et al.  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses , 1984, Hearing Research.

[52]  C Trahiotis,et al.  On the use of the normalized correlation as an index of interaural envelope correlation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  S. Furukawa Detection of combined changes in interaural time and intensity differences: Segregated mechanisms in cue type and in operating frequency range? , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of intensity in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  T. Dau Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation , 1997 .

[56]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  S van de Par,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Andrew J. Byrne,et al.  Discrimination of interaural phase differences in the envelopes of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated 4-kHz tones as a function of modulation depth. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  R. Dye,et al.  Discrimination of interaural envelope delays: the effect of randomizing component starting phase. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  E R Hafter,et al.  The effects of intensity on the detection of interaural differences of time in high-frequency trains of clicks. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.