A preliminary analysis of increase in water use with carbon capture and storage for Indian coal-fired power plants

Abstract Coal shall continue to be the mainstay of Indian energy sector. Nevertheless, if greater decarbonization is desired owing to more stringent climate regulations, CO2 capture and storage may be an important technology. This work focuses on identifying the impact of carbon capture techniques on the water usage of Indian coal-fired power plants. The paper also compares two cooling systems i.e. wet cooling towers and air cooled condensers in their implications on plant performance parameters. To date, various studies have been conducted discussing the effect of CCS technologies in terms of cost and energy requirements in Indian context. However, with stringent water consumption regulations, there is a need for analysing the water-stress caused due to these technologies. This paper uses the Integrated Environmental Control Model (IECM v9.2.1), developed at the Carnegie Mellon University, USA, to carry out a probabilistic modelling to gain insight into the water-energy nexus for CO2 capture systems in India. It is found that, in terms of cost, energy usage and water consumption, the suitability of amine based capture type is maximum. Membrane based capture technique is the most cost intensive whereas ammonia based capture is the most water intensive technology. With inclusion of cooling systems to post-combustion CO2 capture systems methods, it is noted that wet cooling towers perform better than air cooled condensers. But, in a highly water-stressed scenario, air cooled condensers will be preferable due to minimum water consumption. The paper also conducts a sensitivity analysis on the parameters that affect the choice of CO2 capture system and cooling systems such as fuel type, steam cycle heat rate and unit components of cooling systems.

[1]  P. Sadavarte,et al.  Trends in multi-pollutant emissions from a technology-linked inventory for India: I. Industry and transport sectors , 2014 .

[2]  Naushita Sharma,et al.  Life-cycle atmospheric emissions and energy use of the collection phase of a typical Indian sewerage system , 2018 .

[3]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  IECM. Integrated Environmental Control Model , 1999 .

[4]  David R. Luebke,et al.  Advances in CO2 capture technology: A patent review , 2013 .

[5]  P. Kyle,et al.  Influence of climate change mitigation technology on global demands of water for electricity generation , 2013 .

[6]  Colin Campbell,et al.  Practical experience in post-combustion CO2 capture using reactive solvents in large pilot and demonstration plants , 2015 .

[7]  Munish K. Chandel,et al.  The potential impacts of climate-change policy on freshwater use in thermoelectric power generation , 2011 .

[8]  Udayan Singh,et al.  Economic Implications of CO2 Capture from the Existing as Well as Proposed Coal-fired Power Plants in India under Various Policy Scenarios , 2017 .

[9]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The future of global water stress: An integrated assessment , 2014 .

[10]  Anand B. Rao,et al.  Prospects of Implementing CO2 Capture and Sequestration (CCS) in the Proposed Supercritical Coal Power Plants in India , 2016 .

[11]  Samuel Priebe Bertram A United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) e o seu papel: questões conceituais acerca da segurança, da securitização e da politização , 2015 .

[12]  Pramod Kumar,et al.  Suitability of CO 2 capture technologies for carbon capture and storage in India , 2016 .

[13]  Udayan Singh,et al.  Estimating the environmental implications of implementing carbon capture and storage in Indian coal power plants , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Advances in Green Energy (ICAGE).

[14]  Subash Dhar,et al.  India’s GHG Emission Reduction and Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[15]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of Indian coal-fired power plants , 2016 .

[16]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Sustainable development of the Indian coal sector , 2009 .

[17]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C , 2016, Nature.

[18]  Gokhan Aydin,et al.  The Modeling of Coal-related CO2 Emissions and Projections into Future Planning , 2014 .

[19]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Water Impacts of a Low-Carbon Electric Power Future: Assessment Methodology and Status , 2015 .

[20]  Udayan Singh,et al.  Integrating SO2 and NOx control systems in Indian coal-fired power plants , 2015 .

[21]  John A. Harju,et al.  The Nexus of Water and CCS: A Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Perspective , 2014 .

[22]  Patricia Luis,et al.  Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: Consequences and alternatives , 2016 .

[23]  Piyush Kumar,et al.  Cost Implications of Carbon Capture and Storage for the Coal Power Plants in India , 2014 .

[24]  B. Arias,et al.  Emerging CO2 capture systems , 2015 .

[25]  G. Kablouti,et al.  Cost of Water Use: A Driver of Future Investments into Water-efficient Thermal Power Plants? , 2015 .

[26]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Prediction of cost and emission from Indian coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture and storage using artificial intelligence techniques , 2019 .

[27]  Amr Henni,et al.  Recent progress and new developments in post-combustion carbon-capture technology with amine based solvents , 2015 .

[28]  Amit Garg,et al.  Coal and energy security for India: Role of carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (CCS) , 2009 .

[29]  Udayan Singh,et al.  Techno-Economic Assessment of Carbon Mitigation Options for Existing Coal-fired Power Plants in India☆ , 2016 .

[30]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Capturing synergies between water conservation and carbon dioxide emissions in the power sector , 2014 .

[31]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts , 2015 .

[32]  S. K. Gupta,et al.  Water for India in 2050: first-order assessment of available options , 2004 .

[33]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Electricity generation and cooling water use: UK pathways to 2050 § , 2014 .