An Acoustic Study of Production and Perception of English Vowels by Azeri English Learners 1

This study examined the 30 Azeri (AZ) EFL (English as a foreign language) speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Two experiments were carried out: A production test to measure the first two formants of the learners' English vowels, and an identification test with natural stimuli to investigate the L2 (second language) perception of English vowels. In the word list context, the participants read carrier sentences with the target vowels embedded in /hVd/ words. This study although investigated the relationship between the perception and production of English vowels by the Azeri speakers. In production test 11 English monophthongs were produced by male and female participants and the results were compared to Native American (AE) and British English (BR) productions. The production results revealed that the Azeri speakers produced some of the vowels closer to the AE, and some others closer to BR. Azeri speakers had difficulty in both producing and perceiving some English vowels in a native- like fashion. Some inter-gender differences were also found in this research. Importantly, a relationship between vowel perception and production was found because most of the target vowels which were better perceived were also the ones produced more accurately by the L2 learners.

[1]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[2]  B. Shaffer The formation of Azerbaijani collective identity in Iran , 2000, Nationalities Papers.

[3]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: a review , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[5]  W. Strange Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[6]  Domingo Román Montes de Oca,et al.  Keith Johnson (2003): Acoustic & Auditory Phonetics, Blackwell, Oxford 2a edición , 2006 .

[7]  Paola Escudero,et al.  Category formation and the role of spectral quality in the perception and production of English front vowels , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[8]  J. Flege Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[9]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Acoustic and durational properties of Indian English vowels , 2009 .

[10]  David Deterding,et al.  The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation , 1997, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[11]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[12]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics , 1997, Phonetica.

[13]  Sorayya Mozaffarzadeh Peivasti An Acoustic Analysis of Azerbaijani Vowels in Tabrizi Dialect , 2012 .

[14]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[15]  V. V. Heuven,et al.  Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers , 2006 .

[16]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers , 2005, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[17]  P. R. Escudero Neyra,et al.  Linguistic perception and second language acquisition : Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization , 2005 .