Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others

In joint action, multiple people coordinate their actions to perform a task together. This often requires precise temporal and spatial coordination. How do co-actors achieve this? How do they coordinate their actions toward a shared task goal? Here, we provide an overview of the mental representations involved in joint action, discuss how co-actors share sensorimotor information and what general mechanisms support coordination with others. By deliberately extending the review to aspects such as the cultural context in which a joint action takes place, we pay tribute to the complex and variable nature of this social phenomenon.

[1]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[2]  G. Ainsworth Harrison,et al.  Culture and the evolution of man , 1963 .

[3]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[4]  B. Kocher [Are you ready?]. , 1986, Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers.

[5]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Shared Cooperative Activity , 1991 .

[6]  Ron Sept Culture and Interpersonal Communication , 1991 .

[7]  L. Richter Are Early Adult-infant Interactions Universal?—A South African view , 1995 .

[8]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[9]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Perceiving affordances for another person's actions. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[11]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[13]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons , 2002, Science.

[14]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Ergonomics , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[15]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  Ruth Feldman,et al.  Testing a family intervention hypothesis: the contribution of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) to family interaction, proximity, and touch. , 2003, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[17]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[18]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: Effects of intention, attention, and awareness , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  W. Prinz,et al.  How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Pierre Fonlupt,et al.  Listening to a walking human activates the temporal biological motion area , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Suzanne Daneau,et al.  Action , 2020, Remaking the Real Economy.

[26]  B. Gelder Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror System , 2007, Current Biology.

[28]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Action Representation of Sound: Audiomotor Recognition Network While Listening to Newly Acquired Actions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Leonard S. Mark,et al.  Perceiving the Actions of Other People , 2007 .

[30]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  How the gaze of others influences object processing , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Short article: Carrying the height of the world on your ankles: Encumbering observers reduces estimates of how high an actor can jump , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Christopher A. Dickinson,et al.  Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search , 2008, Cognition.

[35]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Understanding the flexibility of action–perception coupling , 2009, Psychological research.

[36]  M. Kimmel,et al.  Intersubjectivity at Close Quarters: How Dancers of Tango Argentino Use Imagery for Interaction and Improvisation , 2009 .

[37]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Self-identification and empathy modulate error-related brain activity during the observation of penalty shots between friend and foe. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[38]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  How Social Are Task Representations? , 2009, Psychological science.

[39]  R. Boyd,et al.  Culture and the evolution of human cooperation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  C. Keysers,et al.  Evidence for mirror systems in emotions , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  D. Keltner,et al.  The communication of emotion via touch. , 2009, Emotion.

[42]  Anna K. Kuhlen,et al.  Two Minds, One Dialog , 2010 .

[43]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Affording cooperation: Embodied constraints, dynamics, and action-scaled invariance in joint lifting , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  A minimal architecture for joint action , 2010, Neural Networks.

[46]  Giorgia Committeri,et al.  Ready Both to Your and to My Hands: Mapping the Action Space of Others , 2011, PloS one.

[47]  Sina Radke,et al.  Mistakes that affect others: An fMRI study on processing of own errors in a social context , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  U. Castiello,et al.  Cues to intention: The role of movement information , 2011, Cognition.

[49]  John Michael,et al.  Shared Emotions and Joint Action , 2011 .

[50]  Robrecht P R D van der Wel,et al.  Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Anne Springer,et al.  Motor execution affects action prediction , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[52]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Hyun Wook Park,et al.  Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy , 2011, NeuroImage.

[54]  Giacomo Novembre,et al.  Distinguishing self and other in joint action. Evidence from a musical paradigm. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Effects of a Coactor ' s Focus of Attention on Task Performance , 2012 .

[56]  Stephen A. Butterfill,et al.  Joint action and development , 2012 .

[57]  A. Effenberg,et al.  Observation of sonified movements engages a basal ganglia frontocortical network , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[58]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Gaze Direction and Request Gesture in Social Interactions , 2012, PloS one.

[59]  Peter E Keller,et al.  Mental imagery in music performance: underlying mechanisms and potential benefits , 2012, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Gerd Schmitz,et al.  PERCEPTUAL EFFECTS OF AUDITORY INFORMATION ABOUT OWN AND OTHER MOVEMENTS , 2012 .

[61]  Valeria Gazzola,et al.  Motor mapping of implied actions during perception of emotional body language , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[62]  Paola Cesari,et al.  Fooling the kickers but not the goalkeepers: behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of fake action detection in soccer. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  G. Logan,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Your Words Are My Words: Effects of Acting Together on Encoding , 2022 .

[64]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Human Sensorimotor Communication: A Theory of Signaling in Online Social Interactions , 2013, PloS one.

[65]  Janeen D. Loehr,et al.  Monitoring Individual and Joint Action Outcomes in Duet Music Performance , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  M. Candidi,et al.  Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  Ivana Konvalinka,et al.  Synchronised and complementary coordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming task , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[69]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Attention Allocation and Task Representation during Joint Action Planning , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[71]  Stephen Smith A pedagogy of vital contact , 2014 .

[72]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Our actions in my mind: Motor imagery of joint action , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[74]  L. Wheaton,et al.  I give you a cup, I get a cup: A kinematic study on social intention , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[75]  G. Fink,et al.  The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[76]  Patric Bach,et al.  The affordance-matching hypothesis: how objects guide action understanding and prediction , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[77]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down visuomotor responses to action observation. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[78]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in the Control of Imitation , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[79]  Peter König,et al.  Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[80]  L. Sartori,et al.  Complementary actions , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[81]  Angelika Foerster,et al.  Coordination Neural Behavioral And Social Dynamics , 2016 .

[82]  R. Ellis,et al.  I see what you say: Prior knowledge of other’s goals automatically biases the perception of their actions , 2016, Cognition.

[83]  P. König,et al.  Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search , 2016, Ergonomics.

[84]  Peter König,et al.  Attentional Resource Allocation in Visuotactile Processing Depends on the Task, But Optimal Visuotactile Integration Does Not Depend on Attentional Resources , 2016, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[85]  Janeen D. Loehr,et al.  The sound of you and me: Novices represent shared goals in joint action , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[86]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  Action-space coding in social contexts , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[87]  Desmond E. Mulligan,et al.  An action-incongruent secondary task modulates prediction accuracy in experienced performers: evidence for motor simulation , 2016, Psychological research.

[88]  S. Pallesen,et al.  Systematic review of the relationship between quick returns in rotating shift work and health-related outcomes , 2016, Ergonomics.

[89]  R. Ellis,et al.  One Step Ahead: The Perceived Kinematics of Others’ Actions Are Biased Toward Expected Goals , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.