Developing a workstation design assistance tool for older knowledge workforce inclusion

The paper addresses two significant and growing trends: knowledge work and population ageing. The population pyramid inversion brings important changes for society as a whole. These changes are associated with the inclusion of older persons in the workforce for knowledge work, which represents a challenge for adapting the work environment to meet all workers’ needs. In order to approach a more universal design of the work environment system, industrial designers need support from user-sensitive inclusive design studies. Moreover, there are plenty of guidelines and tools containing relevant information. However, there is the need to develop more appropriate tools oriented to industrial designers and that cover the initial phase of the design process. A study about and with users and designers have driven the research outcomes and direction. Through an iterative process, various prototypes versions have been developed through research and designers’ feedback. A range of contents and a theoretical framework, namely UCAP, have been developed in order to implement them in this inclusive workstation design guidance tool. This study provides an overview of how knowledge work is affected by the ageing of the population, the role of designers in helping to create inclusive workstations, and the need for developing a new tool to aid designers in this endeavour. A theoretical framework intended for use in the development of the inclusive workstation design guidance tool is proposed and developed. As a result, this study provides one step towards the universal design of the products and environments found in knowledge work for the benefit of not only designers but consumers, makers and buyers of such products, all of whom can benefit from these outcomes.

[1]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  Formats for User Data in Inclusive Design , 2007, HCI.

[2]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  Prior experience in the use of domestic product interfaces , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[3]  Jo-Anne Bichard,et al.  New Demographics New Workspace: Office Design for the Changing Workforce , 2010 .

[4]  Robert Bridger Introduction to Ergonomics , 2008 .

[5]  Peter J. M. Sonnemans,et al.  Quality and Reliability Problems from a Consumer's Perspective: an Increasing Problem Overlooked by Businesses? , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[6]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  Investigating designers’ and users’ cognitive representations of products to assist inclusive interaction design , 2012, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[7]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of industrial engineering : technology and operations management , 2001 .

[8]  Hana Smith,et al.  Emotional Evaluation Of A Product/system , 2008 .

[9]  Ian Hosking,et al.  Making the case for inclusive design. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Intergenerational context as an emphasis for design , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[11]  P. Desmet,et al.  A Multilayered Model of Product Emotions , 2003 .

[12]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  J. Clarkson,et al.  Inclusive design , 2010 .

[14]  M. Gatz,et al.  Spain: promoting the welfare of older adults in the context of population aging. , 2014, The Gerontologist.

[15]  Chajoong Kim,et al.  User characteristics and behaviour in operating annoying electronic products , 2014 .

[16]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of industrial engineering , 2001 .

[17]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[18]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[19]  Alain Bernard,et al.  The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[20]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Designing technology with older people , 2007, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  Peter Gregor,et al.  User-Sensitive Inclusive Design , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[22]  Abdusselam Selami Cifter,et al.  Designing for designers: insights into the knowledge users of inclusive design. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people , 2002, Assets '02.

[24]  John R Wilson,et al.  Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Theo van der Voordt,et al.  After the fire: New ways of working in an academic setting , 2010 .

[26]  Russell Marshall,et al.  Kitchen living in later life: Exploring ergonomic problems, coping strategies and design solutions , 2014 .

[27]  Anneli B. Haake Individual music listening in workplace settings , 2011 .

[28]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation , 2007, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[29]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Achieving compatibility in human-computer interface design and evaluation , 2002 .

[30]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[31]  Jeremy Myerson,et al.  New demographics, new workspace , 2016 .

[32]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  The effects of prior experience on the use of consumer products , 2007, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[33]  G. Evans,et al.  Stress and open-office noise. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  高井 一郎,et al.  Royal College of Artに関する報告 , 1993 .

[35]  J F Suri,et al.  Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The firekeepers: aging considered as a resource , 2012, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[37]  Knut M. Nygaard,et al.  What is Universal Design - Theories, terms and trends , 2017 .

[38]  Francesca Montagna,et al.  Modelling (pre-)Design Activities With a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective , 2015 .

[39]  Eleven lessons : managing design in eleven global companies , 2007 .

[40]  Myriam Arrue,et al.  The use of guidelines to automatically verify Web accessibility , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[41]  Petra M. Bosch-Sijtsema,et al.  Multi-Locational Knowledge Workers in the Office: Navigation, Disturbances and Effectiveness , 2010 .

[42]  Keith Case,et al.  ‘Beyond Jack and Jill’: designing for individuals using HADRIAN , 2004 .

[43]  Simeon Keates Developing BS7000 Part 6 - Guide to Managing Inclusive Design , 2004, User Interfaces for All.

[44]  Marie-Anne Dujarier The three sociological types of consumer work , 2016 .

[45]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  APPLIED TESTS OF ENGINEERING DESIGN SKILLS:VISUAL THINKING CHARACTERIZATION, TEST , 2011 .

[46]  Geo Clausen,et al.  The Combined Effects of Many Different Indoor Environmental Factors on Acceptability and Office Work Performance , 2008 .

[47]  James C. Hyatt,et al.  Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs , 2018 .

[48]  B. Neugarten,et al.  The measurement of life satisfaction. , 1961, Journal of gerontology.